Cargando…
Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study
The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Prostheses against other treatment modalities regarding the jaw kinematics. Six patients with Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses, four with mandibular ramus Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) with condylar hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010007 |
_version_ | 1783643315355254784 |
---|---|
author | Niedzielska, Iwona Bąk, Michał Niedzielski, Damian Okła, Hubert Gabor, Jadwiga Stanula, Arkadiusz Paluch, Jarosław Swinarew, Andrzej Szymon |
author_facet | Niedzielska, Iwona Bąk, Michał Niedzielski, Damian Okła, Hubert Gabor, Jadwiga Stanula, Arkadiusz Paluch, Jarosław Swinarew, Andrzej Szymon |
author_sort | Niedzielska, Iwona |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Prostheses against other treatment modalities regarding the jaw kinematics. Six patients with Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses, four with mandibular ramus Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) with condylar head preservation, and four after mandibular condylectomy were evaluated by the means of axiography (Cadiax Compact 2), which is the noninvasive three-dimensional study of condylar movements. The patients were also evaluated clinically for the mandibular movements. The study revealed that the significant movement limitations occurred bilaterally in patients fitted with TMJ prosthesis. For the protrusion movement, the vector length of the movement (L) for the TMJ prosthesis was 0.31 vs. 3.01 mm for the PSI (Kruskal–Wallis chi-squared = 9.1667, df = 2, p-value = 0.01022, post hoc Dunn p-value = 0.015) and for the laterotrusion to the operated side, the length of the vector (L) was 0.66 vs. 3.35 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences between groups were most frequent for the laterotrusion to the unoperated side. The study shows that a further development on TMJ Prostheses geometry and materials is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7839040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78390402021-01-28 Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study Niedzielska, Iwona Bąk, Michał Niedzielski, Damian Okła, Hubert Gabor, Jadwiga Stanula, Arkadiusz Paluch, Jarosław Swinarew, Andrzej Szymon J Funct Biomater Article The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Prostheses against other treatment modalities regarding the jaw kinematics. Six patients with Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses, four with mandibular ramus Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) with condylar head preservation, and four after mandibular condylectomy were evaluated by the means of axiography (Cadiax Compact 2), which is the noninvasive three-dimensional study of condylar movements. The patients were also evaluated clinically for the mandibular movements. The study revealed that the significant movement limitations occurred bilaterally in patients fitted with TMJ prosthesis. For the protrusion movement, the vector length of the movement (L) for the TMJ prosthesis was 0.31 vs. 3.01 mm for the PSI (Kruskal–Wallis chi-squared = 9.1667, df = 2, p-value = 0.01022, post hoc Dunn p-value = 0.015) and for the laterotrusion to the operated side, the length of the vector (L) was 0.66 vs. 3.35 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences between groups were most frequent for the laterotrusion to the unoperated side. The study shows that a further development on TMJ Prostheses geometry and materials is needed. MDPI 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7839040/ /pubmed/33530438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010007 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niedzielska, Iwona Bąk, Michał Niedzielski, Damian Okła, Hubert Gabor, Jadwiga Stanula, Arkadiusz Paluch, Jarosław Swinarew, Andrzej Szymon Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title | Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title_full | Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title_fullStr | Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title_short | Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance—Preliminary Study |
title_sort | temporomandibular joint prostheses: optimal materials for the optimal stomatognathic system performance—preliminary study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niedzielskaiwona temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT bakmichał temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT niedzielskidamian temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT okłahubert temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT gaborjadwiga temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT stanulaarkadiusz temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT paluchjarosław temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy AT swinarewandrzejszymon temporomandibularjointprosthesesoptimalmaterialsfortheoptimalstomatognathicsystemperformancepreliminarystudy |