Cargando…
Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537631 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110 |
_version_ | 1783643339091869696 |
---|---|
author | Eri, Tine S. Berg, Marie Dahl, Bente Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga Sommerseth, Eva Prinds, Christina |
author_facet | Eri, Tine S. Berg, Marie Dahl, Bente Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga Sommerseth, Eva Prinds, Christina |
author_sort | Eri, Tine S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make the values and attitudes of care visible, it is important to implement care models with explicit epistemological status. The aim of this paper is to identify and gain an overview of publications of theoretical models for midwifery care. METHODS: A mapping review was conducted with systematic searches in nine databases for studies describing a theoretical model or theory for midwifery care that either did or was intended to impact clinical practice. Eligibility criteria were refined during the selection process. RESULTS: Six models from six papers originating from different parts of the world were included in the study. The included models were developed using different methodologies and had different philosophical underpinnings and complexity gradients. Some characteristics were common, the most distinctive being the emphasis of the midwife–woman relationship, secondly the focus on woman-centeredness, and thirdly the salutogenic focus in care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, scarcity exists regarding theoretical models for midwifery care with explicit epistemological status. Further research is needed in order to develop generic theoretical models with an epistemological status to serve as a knowledge base for midwifery healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7839165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78391652021-02-02 Models for midwifery care: A mapping review Eri, Tine S. Berg, Marie Dahl, Bente Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga Sommerseth, Eva Prinds, Christina Eur J Midwifery Review Paper INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make the values and attitudes of care visible, it is important to implement care models with explicit epistemological status. The aim of this paper is to identify and gain an overview of publications of theoretical models for midwifery care. METHODS: A mapping review was conducted with systematic searches in nine databases for studies describing a theoretical model or theory for midwifery care that either did or was intended to impact clinical practice. Eligibility criteria were refined during the selection process. RESULTS: Six models from six papers originating from different parts of the world were included in the study. The included models were developed using different methodologies and had different philosophical underpinnings and complexity gradients. Some characteristics were common, the most distinctive being the emphasis of the midwife–woman relationship, secondly the focus on woman-centeredness, and thirdly the salutogenic focus in care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, scarcity exists regarding theoretical models for midwifery care with explicit epistemological status. Further research is needed in order to develop generic theoretical models with an epistemological status to serve as a knowledge base for midwifery healthcare. European Publishing 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7839165/ /pubmed/33537631 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110 Text en © 2020 Eri T. S. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Eri, Tine S. Berg, Marie Dahl, Bente Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga Sommerseth, Eva Prinds, Christina Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title | Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title_full | Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title_fullStr | Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title_short | Models for midwifery care: A mapping review |
title_sort | models for midwifery care: a mapping review |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537631 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eritines modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview AT bergmarie modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview AT dahlbente modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview AT gottfreðsdottirhelga modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview AT sommersetheva modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview AT prindschristina modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview |