Cargando…

Models for midwifery care: A mapping review

INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eri, Tine S., Berg, Marie, Dahl, Bente, Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga, Sommerseth, Eva, Prinds, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537631
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110
_version_ 1783643339091869696
author Eri, Tine S.
Berg, Marie
Dahl, Bente
Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga
Sommerseth, Eva
Prinds, Christina
author_facet Eri, Tine S.
Berg, Marie
Dahl, Bente
Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga
Sommerseth, Eva
Prinds, Christina
author_sort Eri, Tine S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make the values and attitudes of care visible, it is important to implement care models with explicit epistemological status. The aim of this paper is to identify and gain an overview of publications of theoretical models for midwifery care. METHODS: A mapping review was conducted with systematic searches in nine databases for studies describing a theoretical model or theory for midwifery care that either did or was intended to impact clinical practice. Eligibility criteria were refined during the selection process. RESULTS: Six models from six papers originating from different parts of the world were included in the study. The included models were developed using different methodologies and had different philosophical underpinnings and complexity gradients. Some characteristics were common, the most distinctive being the emphasis of the midwife–woman relationship, secondly the focus on woman-centeredness, and thirdly the salutogenic focus in care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, scarcity exists regarding theoretical models for midwifery care with explicit epistemological status. Further research is needed in order to develop generic theoretical models with an epistemological status to serve as a knowledge base for midwifery healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher European Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78391652021-02-02 Models for midwifery care: A mapping review Eri, Tine S. Berg, Marie Dahl, Bente Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga Sommerseth, Eva Prinds, Christina Eur J Midwifery Review Paper INTRODUCTION: According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidencebased and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make the values and attitudes of care visible, it is important to implement care models with explicit epistemological status. The aim of this paper is to identify and gain an overview of publications of theoretical models for midwifery care. METHODS: A mapping review was conducted with systematic searches in nine databases for studies describing a theoretical model or theory for midwifery care that either did or was intended to impact clinical practice. Eligibility criteria were refined during the selection process. RESULTS: Six models from six papers originating from different parts of the world were included in the study. The included models were developed using different methodologies and had different philosophical underpinnings and complexity gradients. Some characteristics were common, the most distinctive being the emphasis of the midwife–woman relationship, secondly the focus on woman-centeredness, and thirdly the salutogenic focus in care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, scarcity exists regarding theoretical models for midwifery care with explicit epistemological status. Further research is needed in order to develop generic theoretical models with an epistemological status to serve as a knowledge base for midwifery healthcare. European Publishing 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7839165/ /pubmed/33537631 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110 Text en © 2020 Eri T. S. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Eri, Tine S.
Berg, Marie
Dahl, Bente
Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga
Sommerseth, Eva
Prinds, Christina
Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title_full Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title_fullStr Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title_full_unstemmed Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title_short Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
title_sort models for midwifery care: a mapping review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537631
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110
work_keys_str_mv AT eritines modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview
AT bergmarie modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview
AT dahlbente modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview
AT gottfreðsdottirhelga modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview
AT sommersetheva modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview
AT prindschristina modelsformidwiferycareamappingreview