Cargando…

Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center

In Japan, a robotic-assisted PCI (R-PCI) system, the CorPath GRX System (Corindus Inc.), has been approved for clinical use in 2018, which is the first introduction of R-PCI into Japan. In this study, the clinical performance of the R-PCI system in the initial year at Kurume University Hospital was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kagiyama, Kotaro, Mitsutake, Yoshiaki, Ueno, Takafumi, Sakai, Shinji, Nakamura, Takuya, Yamaji, Kazunori, Ishimatsu, Takashi, Sasaki, Masahiro, Chibana, Hidetoshi, Itaya, Naoki, Sasaki, Ken-ichiro, Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33502572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01782-6
_version_ 1783643360708263936
author Kagiyama, Kotaro
Mitsutake, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Takafumi
Sakai, Shinji
Nakamura, Takuya
Yamaji, Kazunori
Ishimatsu, Takashi
Sasaki, Masahiro
Chibana, Hidetoshi
Itaya, Naoki
Sasaki, Ken-ichiro
Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
author_facet Kagiyama, Kotaro
Mitsutake, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Takafumi
Sakai, Shinji
Nakamura, Takuya
Yamaji, Kazunori
Ishimatsu, Takashi
Sasaki, Masahiro
Chibana, Hidetoshi
Itaya, Naoki
Sasaki, Ken-ichiro
Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
author_sort Kagiyama, Kotaro
collection PubMed
description In Japan, a robotic-assisted PCI (R-PCI) system, the CorPath GRX System (Corindus Inc.), has been approved for clinical use in 2018, which is the first introduction of R-PCI into Japan. In this study, the clinical performance of the R-PCI system in the initial year at Kurume University Hospital was evaluated comparing with conventional manual PCI (M-PCI). A total of 30 R-PCI and 77 M-PCI procedures performed between April 2019 and March 2020, were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical success defined as < 30% residual stenosis without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes were fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), amount of radiation exposure to operators and assistants, procedural time, and contrast volume. Propensity-matching technique was used to match each R-PCI lesion to the nearest M-PCI lesion without replacement. After propensity score matching, 30 R-PCI procedures in 28 patients and 37 M-PCI procedures in 35 patients were analyzed. Clinical success rate with R-PCI was favorable and comparable to M-PCI (93.3 vs. 94.6%, p = 0.97), without any in-hospital MACE. The operator radiation exposure was significantly lower in R-PCI (0 vs. 24.5 µSV, p < 0.0001). Radiation exposure to the patients was tended to be reduced by R-PCI (DAP: 77.6 vs. 100.2 Gycm(2), p = 0.07). There were no statistically significant differences in radiation exposure to the assistant, fluoroscopy time, procedural time and contrast volume between the two groups (radiation exposure to the assistant: 10.5 vs. 10.0 µSV, p = 0.64, fluoroscopy time: 27.5 vs. 30.1 min, p = 0.55, procedural time: 72.4 vs. 61.6 min, p = 0.23, and contrast volume: 93.2 vs. 102.0 ml, p = 0.36). R-PCI in selected patients demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes with dramatical reduction of radiation exposure to operators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78392822021-01-28 Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center Kagiyama, Kotaro Mitsutake, Yoshiaki Ueno, Takafumi Sakai, Shinji Nakamura, Takuya Yamaji, Kazunori Ishimatsu, Takashi Sasaki, Masahiro Chibana, Hidetoshi Itaya, Naoki Sasaki, Ken-ichiro Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Heart Vessels Original Article In Japan, a robotic-assisted PCI (R-PCI) system, the CorPath GRX System (Corindus Inc.), has been approved for clinical use in 2018, which is the first introduction of R-PCI into Japan. In this study, the clinical performance of the R-PCI system in the initial year at Kurume University Hospital was evaluated comparing with conventional manual PCI (M-PCI). A total of 30 R-PCI and 77 M-PCI procedures performed between April 2019 and March 2020, were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical success defined as < 30% residual stenosis without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes were fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), amount of radiation exposure to operators and assistants, procedural time, and contrast volume. Propensity-matching technique was used to match each R-PCI lesion to the nearest M-PCI lesion without replacement. After propensity score matching, 30 R-PCI procedures in 28 patients and 37 M-PCI procedures in 35 patients were analyzed. Clinical success rate with R-PCI was favorable and comparable to M-PCI (93.3 vs. 94.6%, p = 0.97), without any in-hospital MACE. The operator radiation exposure was significantly lower in R-PCI (0 vs. 24.5 µSV, p < 0.0001). Radiation exposure to the patients was tended to be reduced by R-PCI (DAP: 77.6 vs. 100.2 Gycm(2), p = 0.07). There were no statistically significant differences in radiation exposure to the assistant, fluoroscopy time, procedural time and contrast volume between the two groups (radiation exposure to the assistant: 10.5 vs. 10.0 µSV, p = 0.64, fluoroscopy time: 27.5 vs. 30.1 min, p = 0.55, procedural time: 72.4 vs. 61.6 min, p = 0.23, and contrast volume: 93.2 vs. 102.0 ml, p = 0.36). R-PCI in selected patients demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes with dramatical reduction of radiation exposure to operators. Springer Japan 2021-01-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7839282/ /pubmed/33502572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01782-6 Text en © Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kagiyama, Kotaro
Mitsutake, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Takafumi
Sakai, Shinji
Nakamura, Takuya
Yamaji, Kazunori
Ishimatsu, Takashi
Sasaki, Masahiro
Chibana, Hidetoshi
Itaya, Naoki
Sasaki, Ken-ichiro
Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title_full Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title_fullStr Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title_full_unstemmed Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title_short Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
title_sort successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33502572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01782-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kagiyamakotaro successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT mitsutakeyoshiaki successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT uenotakafumi successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT sakaishinji successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT nakamuratakuya successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT yamajikazunori successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT ishimatsutakashi successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT sasakimasahiro successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT chibanahidetoshi successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT itayanaoki successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT sasakikenichiro successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter
AT fukumotoyoshihiro successfulintroductionofroboticassistedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsystemintojapaneseclinicalpracticeafirstyearsurveyatsinglecenter