Cargando…

Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application

For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weidinger, Adelheid, Poženel, Laura, Wolbank, Susanne, Banerjee, Asmita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804
_version_ 1783643375150301184
author Weidinger, Adelheid
Poženel, Laura
Wolbank, Susanne
Banerjee, Asmita
author_facet Weidinger, Adelheid
Poženel, Laura
Wolbank, Susanne
Banerjee, Asmita
author_sort Weidinger, Adelheid
collection PubMed
description For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the differentiation potential into all three germ layers, immuno-modulatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. At first sight, the hAM seems to be one structural entity. However, by integrating its anatomical location, the hAM can be divided into placental, reflected, and umbilical amniotic membrane. Recent studies show that cells of these amniotic sub-regions differ considerably in their properties such as morphology, structure, and content/release of certain bioactive factors. The aim of this review is to summarize these findings and discuss the relevance of these different properties for tissue regeneration. In summary, reflected amnion seems to be more immuno-modulatory and could have a higher reprogramming efficiency, whereas placental amnion seems to be pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, with higher proliferation and differentiation capacity (e.g., chondrogenic and osteogenic), and could be more suitable for certain graft constructions. Therefore, we suggest that the respective hAM sub-region should be selected in consideration of its desired outcome. This will help to optimize and fine-tune the clinical application of the hAM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78394102021-01-28 Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application Weidinger, Adelheid Poženel, Laura Wolbank, Susanne Banerjee, Asmita Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the differentiation potential into all three germ layers, immuno-modulatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. At first sight, the hAM seems to be one structural entity. However, by integrating its anatomical location, the hAM can be divided into placental, reflected, and umbilical amniotic membrane. Recent studies show that cells of these amniotic sub-regions differ considerably in their properties such as morphology, structure, and content/release of certain bioactive factors. The aim of this review is to summarize these findings and discuss the relevance of these different properties for tissue regeneration. In summary, reflected amnion seems to be more immuno-modulatory and could have a higher reprogramming efficiency, whereas placental amnion seems to be pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, with higher proliferation and differentiation capacity (e.g., chondrogenic and osteogenic), and could be more suitable for certain graft constructions. Therefore, we suggest that the respective hAM sub-region should be selected in consideration of its desired outcome. This will help to optimize and fine-tune the clinical application of the hAM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7839410/ /pubmed/33520964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804 Text en Copyright © 2021 Weidinger, Poženel, Wolbank and Banerjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Weidinger, Adelheid
Poženel, Laura
Wolbank, Susanne
Banerjee, Asmita
Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title_full Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title_fullStr Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title_full_unstemmed Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title_short Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
title_sort sub-regional differences of the human amniotic membrane and their potential impact on tissue regeneration application
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804
work_keys_str_mv AT weidingeradelheid subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication
AT pozenellaura subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication
AT wolbanksusanne subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication
AT banerjeeasmita subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication