Cargando…
Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application
For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the diffe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804 |
_version_ | 1783643375150301184 |
---|---|
author | Weidinger, Adelheid Poženel, Laura Wolbank, Susanne Banerjee, Asmita |
author_facet | Weidinger, Adelheid Poženel, Laura Wolbank, Susanne Banerjee, Asmita |
author_sort | Weidinger, Adelheid |
collection | PubMed |
description | For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the differentiation potential into all three germ layers, immuno-modulatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. At first sight, the hAM seems to be one structural entity. However, by integrating its anatomical location, the hAM can be divided into placental, reflected, and umbilical amniotic membrane. Recent studies show that cells of these amniotic sub-regions differ considerably in their properties such as morphology, structure, and content/release of certain bioactive factors. The aim of this review is to summarize these findings and discuss the relevance of these different properties for tissue regeneration. In summary, reflected amnion seems to be more immuno-modulatory and could have a higher reprogramming efficiency, whereas placental amnion seems to be pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, with higher proliferation and differentiation capacity (e.g., chondrogenic and osteogenic), and could be more suitable for certain graft constructions. Therefore, we suggest that the respective hAM sub-region should be selected in consideration of its desired outcome. This will help to optimize and fine-tune the clinical application of the hAM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7839410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78394102021-01-28 Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application Weidinger, Adelheid Poženel, Laura Wolbank, Susanne Banerjee, Asmita Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology For more than 100 years, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used in multiple tissue regeneration applications. The hAM consists of cells with stem cell characteristics and a rich layer of extracellular matrix. Undoubtedly, the hAM with viable cells has remarkable properties such as the differentiation potential into all three germ layers, immuno-modulatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. At first sight, the hAM seems to be one structural entity. However, by integrating its anatomical location, the hAM can be divided into placental, reflected, and umbilical amniotic membrane. Recent studies show that cells of these amniotic sub-regions differ considerably in their properties such as morphology, structure, and content/release of certain bioactive factors. The aim of this review is to summarize these findings and discuss the relevance of these different properties for tissue regeneration. In summary, reflected amnion seems to be more immuno-modulatory and could have a higher reprogramming efficiency, whereas placental amnion seems to be pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, with higher proliferation and differentiation capacity (e.g., chondrogenic and osteogenic), and could be more suitable for certain graft constructions. Therefore, we suggest that the respective hAM sub-region should be selected in consideration of its desired outcome. This will help to optimize and fine-tune the clinical application of the hAM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7839410/ /pubmed/33520964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804 Text en Copyright © 2021 Weidinger, Poženel, Wolbank and Banerjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Weidinger, Adelheid Poženel, Laura Wolbank, Susanne Banerjee, Asmita Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title | Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title_full | Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title_fullStr | Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title_full_unstemmed | Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title_short | Sub-Regional Differences of the Human Amniotic Membrane and Their Potential Impact on Tissue Regeneration Application |
title_sort | sub-regional differences of the human amniotic membrane and their potential impact on tissue regeneration application |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.613804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weidingeradelheid subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication AT pozenellaura subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication AT wolbanksusanne subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication AT banerjeeasmita subregionaldifferencesofthehumanamnioticmembraneandtheirpotentialimpactontissueregenerationapplication |