Cargando…

Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus

PREMISE: Cryptic species are evolutionarily distinct lineages lacking distinguishing morphological traits. Hidden diversity may be lurking in widespread species whose distributions cross phylogeographic barriers. This study investigates molecular and morphological variation in the widely distributed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittall, Justen B., Butler, Timothy M., Dick, Cynthia, Sandel, Brody
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1562
_version_ 1783643383867113472
author Whittall, Justen B.
Butler, Timothy M.
Dick, Cynthia
Sandel, Brody
author_facet Whittall, Justen B.
Butler, Timothy M.
Dick, Cynthia
Sandel, Brody
author_sort Whittall, Justen B.
collection PubMed
description PREMISE: Cryptic species are evolutionarily distinct lineages lacking distinguishing morphological traits. Hidden diversity may be lurking in widespread species whose distributions cross phylogeographic barriers. This study investigates molecular and morphological variation in the widely distributed Caulanthus lasiophyllus (Brassicaceae) in comparison to its closest relatives. METHODS: Fifty‐two individuals of C. lasiophyllus from across the species’ range were sequenced for the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and the chloroplast trnL‐F region. A subset of these samples were examined for the chloroplast ndhF gene. All 52 individuals were scored for 13 morphological traits, as well as monthly and annual climate conditions at the collection locality. Morphological and molecular results are compared with the closest relatives—C. anceps and C. flavescens—in the “Guillenia Clade.” To test for polyploidy, genome size estimates were made for four populations. RESULTS: Caulanthus lasiophyllus consists of two distinct lineages separated by eight ITS differences—eight times more variation than what distinguishes C. anceps and C. flavescens. Fewer variable sites were detected in trnL‐F and ndhF regions, yet these data are consistent with the ITS results. The two lineages of C. lasiophyllus are geographically and climatically distinct; yet morphologically overlapping. Their genome sizes are not consistently different. CONCLUSIONS: Two cryptic species within C. lasiophyllus are distinguished at the molecular, geographic, and climatic scales. They have similar genome sizes and are morphologically broadly overlapping, but an ephemeral basal leaf character may help distinguish the species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78394542021-02-01 Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus Whittall, Justen B. Butler, Timothy M. Dick, Cynthia Sandel, Brody Am J Bot Research Articles PREMISE: Cryptic species are evolutionarily distinct lineages lacking distinguishing morphological traits. Hidden diversity may be lurking in widespread species whose distributions cross phylogeographic barriers. This study investigates molecular and morphological variation in the widely distributed Caulanthus lasiophyllus (Brassicaceae) in comparison to its closest relatives. METHODS: Fifty‐two individuals of C. lasiophyllus from across the species’ range were sequenced for the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and the chloroplast trnL‐F region. A subset of these samples were examined for the chloroplast ndhF gene. All 52 individuals were scored for 13 morphological traits, as well as monthly and annual climate conditions at the collection locality. Morphological and molecular results are compared with the closest relatives—C. anceps and C. flavescens—in the “Guillenia Clade.” To test for polyploidy, genome size estimates were made for four populations. RESULTS: Caulanthus lasiophyllus consists of two distinct lineages separated by eight ITS differences—eight times more variation than what distinguishes C. anceps and C. flavescens. Fewer variable sites were detected in trnL‐F and ndhF regions, yet these data are consistent with the ITS results. The two lineages of C. lasiophyllus are geographically and climatically distinct; yet morphologically overlapping. Their genome sizes are not consistently different. CONCLUSIONS: Two cryptic species within C. lasiophyllus are distinguished at the molecular, geographic, and climatic scales. They have similar genome sizes and are morphologically broadly overlapping, but an ephemeral basal leaf character may help distinguish the species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-28 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7839454/ /pubmed/33370466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1562 Text en © 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Botany published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Whittall, Justen B.
Butler, Timothy M.
Dick, Cynthia
Sandel, Brody
Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title_full Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title_fullStr Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title_full_unstemmed Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title_short Two cryptic species of California mustard within Caulanthus lasiophyllus
title_sort two cryptic species of california mustard within caulanthus lasiophyllus
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1562
work_keys_str_mv AT whittalljustenb twocrypticspeciesofcaliforniamustardwithincaulanthuslasiophyllus
AT butlertimothym twocrypticspeciesofcaliforniamustardwithincaulanthuslasiophyllus
AT dickcynthia twocrypticspeciesofcaliforniamustardwithincaulanthuslasiophyllus
AT sandelbrody twocrypticspeciesofcaliforniamustardwithincaulanthuslasiophyllus