Cargando…

Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region

BACKGROUND: Anti‐tumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy increases the risk of tuberculosis (TB). Given limitations of screening techniques, it remains uncertain if patients receiving anti‐TNF in TB endemic regions should be screened for latent infection with chemoprophylaxis restricted to those w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Lingna, Chapman, Thomas P., Wen, Zhenzhen, Lin, Lang, Qiu, Yun, Liu, Zhanju, Ran, Zhihua, Qian, Jiaming, Wu, Kaichun, Gao, Xiang, Hu, Pinjin, Chen, Minhu, Travis, Simon P. L., Cao, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16130
_version_ 1783643405849460736
author Ye, Lingna
Chapman, Thomas P.
Wen, Zhenzhen
Lin, Lang
Qiu, Yun
Liu, Zhanju
Ran, Zhihua
Qian, Jiaming
Wu, Kaichun
Gao, Xiang
Hu, Pinjin
Chen, Minhu
Travis, Simon P. L.
Cao, Qian
author_facet Ye, Lingna
Chapman, Thomas P.
Wen, Zhenzhen
Lin, Lang
Qiu, Yun
Liu, Zhanju
Ran, Zhihua
Qian, Jiaming
Wu, Kaichun
Gao, Xiang
Hu, Pinjin
Chen, Minhu
Travis, Simon P. L.
Cao, Qian
author_sort Ye, Lingna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anti‐tumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy increases the risk of tuberculosis (TB). Given limitations of screening techniques, it remains uncertain if patients receiving anti‐TNF in TB endemic regions should be screened for latent infection with chemoprophylaxis restricted to those with proven infection, or if all patients should receive chemoprophylaxis. AIMS: To compare the incidence of active TB with infliximab (IFX) following targeted and universal TB chemoprophylaxis, and to determine the rates of adverse events (AE) related to TB chemoprophylaxis METHODS: A multi‐centre retrospective cohort study was performed at 18 hospitals in China of 1968 adult patients with IBD receiving IFX from 2009 to 2017. TB screening prior to IFX was performed with chest X‐ray and/or computed tomography [CT] and immune reactivity testing (interferon‐γ release assay and/or tuberculin skin test). Patients were followed‐up for a minimum of 3 months after IFX discontinuation, or until last hospital visit if IFX therapy was ongoing. Targeted strategy was defined as TB chemoprophylaxis only for patients with a positive latent TB screen, with universal strategy defined as TB chemoprophylaxis for all patients. RESULTS: Mean follow‐up was 1.07 ± 0.87 years with a total follow‐up of 2102 patient‐years. There were 1433 patients in the targeted and 483 patients in the universal TB chemoprophylaxis groups, with no significant difference in the incidence rates of active TB between groups (673.3 per 100 000 population per year vs 891.5 per 100 000 population per year, P = 0.60). In the targeted group, 55/1433 patients received TB chemoprophylaxis compared with 483/483 in the universal group, with significantly fewer AEs related to TB chemoprophylaxis in the targeted compared to the universal group (0.35% (5/1433) vs 6.8% (33/483), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients receiving IFX in a TB endemic area, universal chemoprophylaxis was not associated with a reduced risk of active TB when compared to a targeted chemoprophylaxis strategy, and AEs were more common. This supports the use of targeted TB chemoprophylaxis when anti‐TNF therapy is initiated in TB endemic regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78395452021-02-01 Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region Ye, Lingna Chapman, Thomas P. Wen, Zhenzhen Lin, Lang Qiu, Yun Liu, Zhanju Ran, Zhihua Qian, Jiaming Wu, Kaichun Gao, Xiang Hu, Pinjin Chen, Minhu Travis, Simon P. L. Cao, Qian Aliment Pharmacol Ther Targeted Chemoprophylaxis for Tuberculosis in IBD Patients Receiving Anti‐tnf BACKGROUND: Anti‐tumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy increases the risk of tuberculosis (TB). Given limitations of screening techniques, it remains uncertain if patients receiving anti‐TNF in TB endemic regions should be screened for latent infection with chemoprophylaxis restricted to those with proven infection, or if all patients should receive chemoprophylaxis. AIMS: To compare the incidence of active TB with infliximab (IFX) following targeted and universal TB chemoprophylaxis, and to determine the rates of adverse events (AE) related to TB chemoprophylaxis METHODS: A multi‐centre retrospective cohort study was performed at 18 hospitals in China of 1968 adult patients with IBD receiving IFX from 2009 to 2017. TB screening prior to IFX was performed with chest X‐ray and/or computed tomography [CT] and immune reactivity testing (interferon‐γ release assay and/or tuberculin skin test). Patients were followed‐up for a minimum of 3 months after IFX discontinuation, or until last hospital visit if IFX therapy was ongoing. Targeted strategy was defined as TB chemoprophylaxis only for patients with a positive latent TB screen, with universal strategy defined as TB chemoprophylaxis for all patients. RESULTS: Mean follow‐up was 1.07 ± 0.87 years with a total follow‐up of 2102 patient‐years. There were 1433 patients in the targeted and 483 patients in the universal TB chemoprophylaxis groups, with no significant difference in the incidence rates of active TB between groups (673.3 per 100 000 population per year vs 891.5 per 100 000 population per year, P = 0.60). In the targeted group, 55/1433 patients received TB chemoprophylaxis compared with 483/483 in the universal group, with significantly fewer AEs related to TB chemoprophylaxis in the targeted compared to the universal group (0.35% (5/1433) vs 6.8% (33/483), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients receiving IFX in a TB endemic area, universal chemoprophylaxis was not associated with a reduced risk of active TB when compared to a targeted chemoprophylaxis strategy, and AEs were more common. This supports the use of targeted TB chemoprophylaxis when anti‐TNF therapy is initiated in TB endemic regions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-12 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7839545/ /pubmed/33314259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16130 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Targeted Chemoprophylaxis for Tuberculosis in IBD Patients Receiving Anti‐tnf
Ye, Lingna
Chapman, Thomas P.
Wen, Zhenzhen
Lin, Lang
Qiu, Yun
Liu, Zhanju
Ran, Zhihua
Qian, Jiaming
Wu, Kaichun
Gao, Xiang
Hu, Pinjin
Chen, Minhu
Travis, Simon P. L.
Cao, Qian
Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title_full Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title_fullStr Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title_full_unstemmed Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title_short Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
title_sort targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti‐tnf therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region
topic Targeted Chemoprophylaxis for Tuberculosis in IBD Patients Receiving Anti‐tnf
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16130
work_keys_str_mv AT yelingna targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT chapmanthomasp targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT wenzhenzhen targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT linlang targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT qiuyun targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT liuzhanju targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT ranzhihua targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT qianjiaming targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT wukaichun targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT gaoxiang targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT hupinjin targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT chenminhu targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT travissimonpl targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT caoqian targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion
AT targetedversusuniversaltuberculosischemoprophylaxisin1968patientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasereceivingantitnftherapyinatuberculosisendemicregion