Cargando…
Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study
AIM: To compare marginal bone level changes around immediately placed and immediately provisionalized implants with immediately placed and delayed provisionalized implants in the aesthetic region after five years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a failing tooth in the maxillar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13398 |
_version_ | 1783643438896381952 |
---|---|
author | Slagter, Kirsten W. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Hentenaar, Diederik F. M. Vissink, Arjan Meijer, Henny J. A. |
author_facet | Slagter, Kirsten W. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Hentenaar, Diederik F. M. Vissink, Arjan Meijer, Henny J. A. |
author_sort | Slagter, Kirsten W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare marginal bone level changes around immediately placed and immediately provisionalized implants with immediately placed and delayed provisionalized implants in the aesthetic region after five years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a failing tooth in the maxillary anterior region were randomly assigned immediate implant placement with immediate (Group A: n = 20) or delayed (Group B: n = 20) provisionalization. Definitive crown placement occurred three months after provisionalization. The primary outcomes were changes in marginal bone level. In addition, survival rates, buccal bone thickness, soft peri‐implant tissues, aesthetics and patient‐reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: After 5 years, the mean mesial and distal marginal bone level changes were 0.71 ± 0.68 mm and 0.71 ± 0.71 mm, respectively, in group A and 0.49 ± 0.52 mm and 0.54 ± 0.64 mm, respectively, in group B; the difference between the groups was not significant (p = .305 and p = .477, respectively). Implant and restoration survivals were 100%. No clinically relevant differences in buccal bone thickness or in mid‐facial peri‐implant mucosal level, aesthetic and patient outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The mean marginal bone level changes following immediate implant placement and provisionalization were comparable with immediate implant placement and delayed provisionalization. (www.isrctn.com: ISRCTN57251089 and www.trialregister.nl: NL8255). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7839711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78397112021-02-02 Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study Slagter, Kirsten W. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Hentenaar, Diederik F. M. Vissink, Arjan Meijer, Henny J. A. J Clin Periodontol Implant Therapy AIM: To compare marginal bone level changes around immediately placed and immediately provisionalized implants with immediately placed and delayed provisionalized implants in the aesthetic region after five years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a failing tooth in the maxillary anterior region were randomly assigned immediate implant placement with immediate (Group A: n = 20) or delayed (Group B: n = 20) provisionalization. Definitive crown placement occurred three months after provisionalization. The primary outcomes were changes in marginal bone level. In addition, survival rates, buccal bone thickness, soft peri‐implant tissues, aesthetics and patient‐reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: After 5 years, the mean mesial and distal marginal bone level changes were 0.71 ± 0.68 mm and 0.71 ± 0.71 mm, respectively, in group A and 0.49 ± 0.52 mm and 0.54 ± 0.64 mm, respectively, in group B; the difference between the groups was not significant (p = .305 and p = .477, respectively). Implant and restoration survivals were 100%. No clinically relevant differences in buccal bone thickness or in mid‐facial peri‐implant mucosal level, aesthetic and patient outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The mean marginal bone level changes following immediate implant placement and provisionalization were comparable with immediate implant placement and delayed provisionalization. (www.isrctn.com: ISRCTN57251089 and www.trialregister.nl: NL8255). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-25 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7839711/ /pubmed/33141935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13398 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Implant Therapy Slagter, Kirsten W. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Hentenaar, Diederik F. M. Vissink, Arjan Meijer, Henny J. A. Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title | Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title_full | Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title_fullStr | Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title_short | Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: A 5‐year comparative study |
title_sort | immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: a 5‐year comparative study |
topic | Implant Therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slagterkirstenw immediateplacementofsingleimplantswithorwithoutimmediateprovisionalizationinthemaxillaryaestheticregiona5yearcomparativestudy AT raghoebargerrym immediateplacementofsingleimplantswithorwithoutimmediateprovisionalizationinthemaxillaryaestheticregiona5yearcomparativestudy AT hentenaardiederikfm immediateplacementofsingleimplantswithorwithoutimmediateprovisionalizationinthemaxillaryaestheticregiona5yearcomparativestudy AT vissinkarjan immediateplacementofsingleimplantswithorwithoutimmediateprovisionalizationinthemaxillaryaestheticregiona5yearcomparativestudy AT meijerhennyja immediateplacementofsingleimplantswithorwithoutimmediateprovisionalizationinthemaxillaryaestheticregiona5yearcomparativestudy |