Cargando…

Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a 13-week anomaly scan on the experienced levels of maternal anxiety and well-being. Secondly, to explore women’s knowledge on the possibilities and limitations of the scan and the preferred timing of screening for structura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bardi, Francesca, Bakker, Merel, Kenkhuis, Monique J. A., Ranchor, Adelita V., Bakker, Marian K., Elvan, Ayten, Birnie, Erwin, Bilardo, Caterina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245938
_version_ 1783643494994149376
author Bardi, Francesca
Bakker, Merel
Kenkhuis, Monique J. A.
Ranchor, Adelita V.
Bakker, Marian K.
Elvan, Ayten
Birnie, Erwin
Bilardo, Caterina M.
author_facet Bardi, Francesca
Bakker, Merel
Kenkhuis, Monique J. A.
Ranchor, Adelita V.
Bakker, Marian K.
Elvan, Ayten
Birnie, Erwin
Bilardo, Caterina M.
author_sort Bardi, Francesca
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a 13-week anomaly scan on the experienced levels of maternal anxiety and well-being. Secondly, to explore women’s knowledge on the possibilities and limitations of the scan and the preferred timing of screening for structural abnormalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective-cohort study conducted between 2013–2015, pregnant women in the North-Netherlands underwent a 13-week anomaly scan. Four online-questionnaires (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) were completed before and after the 13- and the 20-week anomaly scans. In total, 1512 women consented to participate in the study and 1118 (74%) completed the questionnaires at Q1, 941 (64%) at Q2, 807 (55%) at Q3 and 535 (37%) at Q4. Psychological outcomes were measured by the state-trait inventory-scale (STAI), the patient’s positive-negative affect (PANAS) and ad-hoc designed questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine-nine percent of women wished to be informed as early as possible in pregnancy about the absence/presence of structural abnormalities. In 87% of women levels of knowledge on the goals and limitations of the 13-week anomaly scan were moderate-to-high. In women with a normal 13-week scan result, anxiety levels decreased (P < .001) and well-being increased over time (P < .001). In women with false-positive results (n = 26), anxiety levels initially increased (STAI-Q1: 39.8 vs. STAI-Q2: 48.6, P = 0.025), but later decreased around the 20-week anomaly scan (STAI-Q3: 36.4 vs. STAI-Q4: 34.2, P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The 13-week scan did not negatively impact the psychological well-being of pregnant women. The small number of women with screen-positive results temporarily experienced higher anxiety after the scan but, in false-positive cases, anxiety levels normalized again when the abnormality was not confirmed at follow-up scans. Finally, most pregnant women have moderate-to-high levels of knowledge and strongly prefer early screening for fetal structural abnormalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78400262021-02-02 Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study Bardi, Francesca Bakker, Merel Kenkhuis, Monique J. A. Ranchor, Adelita V. Bakker, Marian K. Elvan, Ayten Birnie, Erwin Bilardo, Caterina M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a 13-week anomaly scan on the experienced levels of maternal anxiety and well-being. Secondly, to explore women’s knowledge on the possibilities and limitations of the scan and the preferred timing of screening for structural abnormalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective-cohort study conducted between 2013–2015, pregnant women in the North-Netherlands underwent a 13-week anomaly scan. Four online-questionnaires (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) were completed before and after the 13- and the 20-week anomaly scans. In total, 1512 women consented to participate in the study and 1118 (74%) completed the questionnaires at Q1, 941 (64%) at Q2, 807 (55%) at Q3 and 535 (37%) at Q4. Psychological outcomes were measured by the state-trait inventory-scale (STAI), the patient’s positive-negative affect (PANAS) and ad-hoc designed questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine-nine percent of women wished to be informed as early as possible in pregnancy about the absence/presence of structural abnormalities. In 87% of women levels of knowledge on the goals and limitations of the 13-week anomaly scan were moderate-to-high. In women with a normal 13-week scan result, anxiety levels decreased (P < .001) and well-being increased over time (P < .001). In women with false-positive results (n = 26), anxiety levels initially increased (STAI-Q1: 39.8 vs. STAI-Q2: 48.6, P = 0.025), but later decreased around the 20-week anomaly scan (STAI-Q3: 36.4 vs. STAI-Q4: 34.2, P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The 13-week scan did not negatively impact the psychological well-being of pregnant women. The small number of women with screen-positive results temporarily experienced higher anxiety after the scan but, in false-positive cases, anxiety levels normalized again when the abnormality was not confirmed at follow-up scans. Finally, most pregnant women have moderate-to-high levels of knowledge and strongly prefer early screening for fetal structural abnormalities. Public Library of Science 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7840026/ /pubmed/33503072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245938 Text en © 2021 Bardi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bardi, Francesca
Bakker, Merel
Kenkhuis, Monique J. A.
Ranchor, Adelita V.
Bakker, Marian K.
Elvan, Ayten
Birnie, Erwin
Bilardo, Caterina M.
Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title_full Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title_short Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study
title_sort psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245938
work_keys_str_mv AT bardifrancesca psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bakkermerel psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kenkhuismoniqueja psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ranchoradelitav psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bakkermariank psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT elvanayten psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT birnieerwin psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bilardocaterinam psychologicaloutcomesknowledgeandpreferencesofpregnantwomenonfirsttrimesterscreeningforfetalstructuralabnormalitiesaprospectivecohortstudy