Cargando…

Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evaluated whether noninva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Besen, Bruno A. M. P., Park, Marcelo, Ranzani, Otávio T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072
_version_ 1783643496792457216
author Besen, Bruno A. M. P.
Park, Marcelo
Ranzani, Otávio T.
author_facet Besen, Bruno A. M. P.
Park, Marcelo
Ranzani, Otávio T.
author_sort Besen, Bruno A. M. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evaluated whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) would be beneficial compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) regarding hospital mortality. METHODS: Multicenter cohort study of VOPs admitted with CAP in need of IMV or NIV to 11 Brazilian ICUs from 2009 through 2012. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the association between the initial ventilatory strategy (NIV vs. IMV) and hospital mortality adjusting for confounding factors. We evaluated effect modification with interaction terms in pre-specified sub-groups. RESULTS: Of 369 VOPs admitted for CAP with respiratory failure, 232 (63%) received NIV and 137 (37%) received IMV as initial ventilatory strategy. IMV patients were sicker at baseline (median SOFA 8 vs. 4). Hospital mortality was 114/232 (49%) for NIV and 90/137 (66%) for IMV. For the comparison NIV vs. IMV (reference), the crude odds ratio (OR) was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.33–0.78, p = 0.002). This association was largely confounded by antecedent characteristics and non-respiratory SOFA ((adj)OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.41–1.20, p = 0.196). The fully adjusted model, additionally including P(a)o(2)/F(i)o(2) ratio, pH and P(a)co(2), yielded an (adj)OR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.46–1.41, p = 0.452). There was no strong evidence of effect modification among relevant subgroups, such as P(a)o(2)/F(i)o(2) ratio ≤ 150 (p = 0.30), acute respiratory acidosis (p = 0.42) and non-respiratory SOFA ≥ 4 (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: NIV was not associated with lower hospital mortality when compared to IMV in critically ill VOP admitted with CAP, but there was no strong signal of harm from its use. The main confounders of this association were both the severity of respiratory dysfunction and of extra-respiratory organ failures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78400332021-02-02 Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study Besen, Bruno A. M. P. Park, Marcelo Ranzani, Otávio T. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evaluated whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) would be beneficial compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) regarding hospital mortality. METHODS: Multicenter cohort study of VOPs admitted with CAP in need of IMV or NIV to 11 Brazilian ICUs from 2009 through 2012. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the association between the initial ventilatory strategy (NIV vs. IMV) and hospital mortality adjusting for confounding factors. We evaluated effect modification with interaction terms in pre-specified sub-groups. RESULTS: Of 369 VOPs admitted for CAP with respiratory failure, 232 (63%) received NIV and 137 (37%) received IMV as initial ventilatory strategy. IMV patients were sicker at baseline (median SOFA 8 vs. 4). Hospital mortality was 114/232 (49%) for NIV and 90/137 (66%) for IMV. For the comparison NIV vs. IMV (reference), the crude odds ratio (OR) was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.33–0.78, p = 0.002). This association was largely confounded by antecedent characteristics and non-respiratory SOFA ((adj)OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.41–1.20, p = 0.196). The fully adjusted model, additionally including P(a)o(2)/F(i)o(2) ratio, pH and P(a)co(2), yielded an (adj)OR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.46–1.41, p = 0.452). There was no strong evidence of effect modification among relevant subgroups, such as P(a)o(2)/F(i)o(2) ratio ≤ 150 (p = 0.30), acute respiratory acidosis (p = 0.42) and non-respiratory SOFA ≥ 4 (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: NIV was not associated with lower hospital mortality when compared to IMV in critically ill VOP admitted with CAP, but there was no strong signal of harm from its use. The main confounders of this association were both the severity of respiratory dysfunction and of extra-respiratory organ failures. Public Library of Science 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7840033/ /pubmed/33503042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072 Text en © 2021 Besen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Besen, Bruno A. M. P.
Park, Marcelo
Ranzani, Otávio T.
Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_short Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_sort noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072
work_keys_str_mv AT besenbrunoamp noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT parkmarcelo noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ranzaniotaviot noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy