Cargando…

Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh

Brucellosis is a neglected endemic zoonosis in Bangladesh and has a significant impact on public health and animal welfare of dairy farming as well as dairy farm economics. A cross‐sectional study was conducted to evaluate the seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis in dairy cattle in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Shariful, Barua, Shama Ranjan, Moni, Shahnaj Parvin, Islam, Ariful, Rahman, A. K. M. Anisur, Chowdhury, Sharmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32949434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.348
_version_ 1783643525489885184
author Islam, Shariful
Barua, Shama Ranjan
Moni, Shahnaj Parvin
Islam, Ariful
Rahman, A. K. M. Anisur
Chowdhury, Sharmin
author_facet Islam, Shariful
Barua, Shama Ranjan
Moni, Shahnaj Parvin
Islam, Ariful
Rahman, A. K. M. Anisur
Chowdhury, Sharmin
author_sort Islam, Shariful
collection PubMed
description Brucellosis is a neglected endemic zoonosis in Bangladesh and has a significant impact on public health and animal welfare of dairy farming as well as dairy farm economics. A cross‐sectional study was conducted to evaluate the seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis in dairy cattle in the Chittagong metropolitan area (CMA) of Chittagong, Bangladesh. We collected serum samples (n = 158) from six randomly selected dairy farms in the CMA between February and November, 2015. The Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and a competitive ELISA (cELISA) were used as the screening and confirmatory tests respectively. Farm level and animal level demographic and risk factor data were collected using a questionnaire. The risk factors were analysed using a multivariable logistic regression with random effects. The overall seroprevalences of antibodies against brucellosis in cattle were 21.5% (34/158) and 7.6% (12/158) based on parallel and serial interpretation of the two tests respectively. Our results revealed that 20.3% (32/158) samples were positive using the RBPT and 8.9% (14/158) were positive using the cELISA. The within‐herd seroprevalence ranged from 10% to 26.3% and 5 to 20.7% using the RBPT and cELISA tests respectively. The odds of seropositivity were significantly higher in lactating cows (OR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.02–6.55), cows producing less than 2 litres of milk (OR: 29.6; 95% CI: 4.3–353.8), cow producing 2–12 litres of milk (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.1–33.4) and cows with reproductive disorders (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.2–10.1). About 7.6% (12/158) and 1.3% (2/158) of cattle were found to be infected with acute and chronic brucellosis respectively. Based on these results, we suggest that cows that have reproductive disorders and are producing little milk should be prioritized for brucellosis screening in CMA. The screening tests should be used to control brucellosis in cattle in order to protect animal welfare, human health and to minimize the economic losses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78401932021-02-04 Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh Islam, Shariful Barua, Shama Ranjan Moni, Shahnaj Parvin Islam, Ariful Rahman, A. K. M. Anisur Chowdhury, Sharmin Vet Med Sci Original Articles Brucellosis is a neglected endemic zoonosis in Bangladesh and has a significant impact on public health and animal welfare of dairy farming as well as dairy farm economics. A cross‐sectional study was conducted to evaluate the seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis in dairy cattle in the Chittagong metropolitan area (CMA) of Chittagong, Bangladesh. We collected serum samples (n = 158) from six randomly selected dairy farms in the CMA between February and November, 2015. The Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and a competitive ELISA (cELISA) were used as the screening and confirmatory tests respectively. Farm level and animal level demographic and risk factor data were collected using a questionnaire. The risk factors were analysed using a multivariable logistic regression with random effects. The overall seroprevalences of antibodies against brucellosis in cattle were 21.5% (34/158) and 7.6% (12/158) based on parallel and serial interpretation of the two tests respectively. Our results revealed that 20.3% (32/158) samples were positive using the RBPT and 8.9% (14/158) were positive using the cELISA. The within‐herd seroprevalence ranged from 10% to 26.3% and 5 to 20.7% using the RBPT and cELISA tests respectively. The odds of seropositivity were significantly higher in lactating cows (OR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.02–6.55), cows producing less than 2 litres of milk (OR: 29.6; 95% CI: 4.3–353.8), cow producing 2–12 litres of milk (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.1–33.4) and cows with reproductive disorders (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.2–10.1). About 7.6% (12/158) and 1.3% (2/158) of cattle were found to be infected with acute and chronic brucellosis respectively. Based on these results, we suggest that cows that have reproductive disorders and are producing little milk should be prioritized for brucellosis screening in CMA. The screening tests should be used to control brucellosis in cattle in order to protect animal welfare, human health and to minimize the economic losses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7840193/ /pubmed/32949434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.348 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Islam, Shariful
Barua, Shama Ranjan
Moni, Shahnaj Parvin
Islam, Ariful
Rahman, A. K. M. Anisur
Chowdhury, Sharmin
Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title_full Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title_fullStr Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title_short Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh
title_sort seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the chittagong metropolitan area of bangladesh
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32949434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.348
work_keys_str_mv AT islamshariful seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh
AT baruashamaranjan seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh
AT monishahnajparvin seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh
AT islamariful seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh
AT rahmanakmanisur seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh
AT chowdhurysharmin seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbovinebrucellosisinthechittagongmetropolitanareaofbangladesh