Cargando…

Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review

Equines are subject to infection with many parasites, which threaten their health. In the present study, we systematically reviewed existing literature on the prevalence of endo‐ and ectoparasites of equines in Iran. Major electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Scien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khamesipour, Faham, Taktaz‐Hafshejani, Taghi, Tebit, Kwenti E., Razavi, Seyed Mostafa, Hosseini, Seyed Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32644306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.321
_version_ 1783643526654853120
author Khamesipour, Faham
Taktaz‐Hafshejani, Taghi
Tebit, Kwenti E.
Razavi, Seyed Mostafa
Hosseini, Seyed Reza
author_facet Khamesipour, Faham
Taktaz‐Hafshejani, Taghi
Tebit, Kwenti E.
Razavi, Seyed Mostafa
Hosseini, Seyed Reza
author_sort Khamesipour, Faham
collection PubMed
description Equines are subject to infection with many parasites, which threaten their health. In the present study, we systematically reviewed existing literature on the prevalence of endo‐ and ectoparasites of equines in Iran. Major electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Science Direct and Scientific Information Database (SID), were searched (Last updated 11/05/2018) for relevant literature of parasites that have been identified from equines in Iran. Of the 1809 titles produced by bibliographic search, 38 were included in the review. Twenty‐seven of the studies were on horses, six on donkeys, three on both horses and donkeys, and one study was on both horses and mules. Furthermore, 24 of the studies reported infections caused by protozoa, thirteen by helminths, two by ectoparasites, and one by both protozoa and helminths. The overall pooled prevalence of parasitic infection was 28.8% (95%CI: 22.9–35.7, I (2) = 93.4%). Helminths were the most prevalent parasites 46.7% (95% CI: 24.1–70.7, I (2)  = 96.0%). Furthermore, donkeys were the most affected equine, with a prevalence of 70.7% (95% CI: 53.2–83.7, I (2)  = 92.5%). The protozoa frequently reported included nine species belonging to the genera: Neospora, Toxoplasma, Theileria, Babesia and Eimeria. Also, the helminths frequently reported included 21 species belonging to the genera: Strongylus, Dicrocoelium, Oxyuris, Habronema, Echinococcus, Dictyocaulus, Cyathostomum, Probstmayria, Anoplocephala, Setaria and Fasciola. Ticks were the only ectoparasites frequently reported. Parasitic fly species of the genera Gasterophilus were also reported. The study‐level risk of bias was likely to be high because of differences in study design. Parasitic infections of equines in Iran are frequent and caused by a diversity of parasites, which threatens the health and well‐being of these animals. Further research is needed in the area to identify the risk factors of infection for effective control of the parasites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78401982021-02-04 Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review Khamesipour, Faham Taktaz‐Hafshejani, Taghi Tebit, Kwenti E. Razavi, Seyed Mostafa Hosseini, Seyed Reza Vet Med Sci Review Equines are subject to infection with many parasites, which threaten their health. In the present study, we systematically reviewed existing literature on the prevalence of endo‐ and ectoparasites of equines in Iran. Major electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Science Direct and Scientific Information Database (SID), were searched (Last updated 11/05/2018) for relevant literature of parasites that have been identified from equines in Iran. Of the 1809 titles produced by bibliographic search, 38 were included in the review. Twenty‐seven of the studies were on horses, six on donkeys, three on both horses and donkeys, and one study was on both horses and mules. Furthermore, 24 of the studies reported infections caused by protozoa, thirteen by helminths, two by ectoparasites, and one by both protozoa and helminths. The overall pooled prevalence of parasitic infection was 28.8% (95%CI: 22.9–35.7, I (2) = 93.4%). Helminths were the most prevalent parasites 46.7% (95% CI: 24.1–70.7, I (2)  = 96.0%). Furthermore, donkeys were the most affected equine, with a prevalence of 70.7% (95% CI: 53.2–83.7, I (2)  = 92.5%). The protozoa frequently reported included nine species belonging to the genera: Neospora, Toxoplasma, Theileria, Babesia and Eimeria. Also, the helminths frequently reported included 21 species belonging to the genera: Strongylus, Dicrocoelium, Oxyuris, Habronema, Echinococcus, Dictyocaulus, Cyathostomum, Probstmayria, Anoplocephala, Setaria and Fasciola. Ticks were the only ectoparasites frequently reported. Parasitic fly species of the genera Gasterophilus were also reported. The study‐level risk of bias was likely to be high because of differences in study design. Parasitic infections of equines in Iran are frequent and caused by a diversity of parasites, which threatens the health and well‐being of these animals. Further research is needed in the area to identify the risk factors of infection for effective control of the parasites. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7840198/ /pubmed/32644306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.321 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Khamesipour, Faham
Taktaz‐Hafshejani, Taghi
Tebit, Kwenti E.
Razavi, Seyed Mostafa
Hosseini, Seyed Reza
Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title_full Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title_fullStr Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title_short Prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review
title_sort prevalence of endo‐ and ecto‐parasites of equines in iran: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32644306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.321
work_keys_str_mv AT khamesipourfaham prevalenceofendoandectoparasitesofequinesiniranasystematicreview
AT taktazhafshejanitaghi prevalenceofendoandectoparasitesofequinesiniranasystematicreview
AT tebitkwentie prevalenceofendoandectoparasitesofequinesiniranasystematicreview
AT razaviseyedmostafa prevalenceofendoandectoparasitesofequinesiniranasystematicreview
AT hosseiniseyedreza prevalenceofendoandectoparasitesofequinesiniranasystematicreview