Cargando…

Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs

BACKGROUND: Quantifying hepatic gene expression is important for many pharmacogenetic studies. However, this usually requires biopsy (BX), which is invasive. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of using minimally invasive fine needle aspirate (FNA) to quantify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hull, Matthew B., Schermerhorn, Thomas, Vieson, Miranda D., Reinhart, Jennifer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32951355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.351
_version_ 1783643530343743488
author Hull, Matthew B.
Schermerhorn, Thomas
Vieson, Miranda D.
Reinhart, Jennifer M.
author_facet Hull, Matthew B.
Schermerhorn, Thomas
Vieson, Miranda D.
Reinhart, Jennifer M.
author_sort Hull, Matthew B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantifying hepatic gene expression is important for many pharmacogenetic studies. However, this usually requires biopsy (BX), which is invasive. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of using minimally invasive fine needle aspirate (FNA) to quantify hepatic gene expression and to assess expression variability between different sampling sites. METHODS: Biopsy and FNA samples were acquired from central and peripheral locations of the right and left lateral liver lobes of a dog. Relative expression of ABCB1, GSTT1 and CYP3A12 were measured via reverse transcriptase, quantitative PCR. The effect of sampling method, lobe and location within the lobe on gene expression was assessed using a three‐way ANOVA. RESULTS: Relative expression of ABCB1 and GSTT1 were not statistically different between sampling methods but CYP3A12 expression was higher in samples collected by BX (p = .013). Lobe sampled affected ABCB1 expression (p = .001) and site within lobe affected ABCB1 (p = .018) and GSTT1 (p = .025) expression. CONCLUSIONS: FNA appears to be a feasible technique for minimally invasive evaluation of hepatic gene expression but results should not be directly compared to biopsy samples. Sampling location impacts expression of some targets; combination of FNAs from multiple sites may reduce variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78402132021-02-04 Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs Hull, Matthew B. Schermerhorn, Thomas Vieson, Miranda D. Reinhart, Jennifer M. Vet Med Sci Original Articles BACKGROUND: Quantifying hepatic gene expression is important for many pharmacogenetic studies. However, this usually requires biopsy (BX), which is invasive. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of using minimally invasive fine needle aspirate (FNA) to quantify hepatic gene expression and to assess expression variability between different sampling sites. METHODS: Biopsy and FNA samples were acquired from central and peripheral locations of the right and left lateral liver lobes of a dog. Relative expression of ABCB1, GSTT1 and CYP3A12 were measured via reverse transcriptase, quantitative PCR. The effect of sampling method, lobe and location within the lobe on gene expression was assessed using a three‐way ANOVA. RESULTS: Relative expression of ABCB1 and GSTT1 were not statistically different between sampling methods but CYP3A12 expression was higher in samples collected by BX (p = .013). Lobe sampled affected ABCB1 expression (p = .001) and site within lobe affected ABCB1 (p = .018) and GSTT1 (p = .025) expression. CONCLUSIONS: FNA appears to be a feasible technique for minimally invasive evaluation of hepatic gene expression but results should not be directly compared to biopsy samples. Sampling location impacts expression of some targets; combination of FNAs from multiple sites may reduce variation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7840213/ /pubmed/32951355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.351 Text en © 2020 The Authors Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hull, Matthew B.
Schermerhorn, Thomas
Vieson, Miranda D.
Reinhart, Jennifer M.
Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title_full Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title_fullStr Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title_short Feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
title_sort feasibility of hepatic fine needle aspiration as a minimally invasive sampling method for gene expression quantification of pharmacogenetic targets in dogs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32951355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.351
work_keys_str_mv AT hullmatthewb feasibilityofhepaticfineneedleaspirationasaminimallyinvasivesamplingmethodforgeneexpressionquantificationofpharmacogenetictargetsindogs
AT schermerhornthomas feasibilityofhepaticfineneedleaspirationasaminimallyinvasivesamplingmethodforgeneexpressionquantificationofpharmacogenetictargetsindogs
AT viesonmirandad feasibilityofhepaticfineneedleaspirationasaminimallyinvasivesamplingmethodforgeneexpressionquantificationofpharmacogenetictargetsindogs
AT reinhartjenniferm feasibilityofhepaticfineneedleaspirationasaminimallyinvasivesamplingmethodforgeneexpressionquantificationofpharmacogenetictargetsindogs