Cargando…

TALEN outperforms Cas9 in editing heterochromatin target sites

Genome editing critically relies on selective recognition of target sites. However, despite recent progress, the underlying search mechanism of genome-editing proteins is not fully understood in the context of cellular chromatin environments. Here, we use single-molecule imaging in live cells to dir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Surbhi, Shukla, Saurabh, Yang, Che, Zhang, Meng, Fatma, Zia, Lingamaneni, Manasi, Abesteh, Shireen, Lane, Stephan Thomas, Xiong, Xiong, Wang, Yuchuan, Schroeder, Charles M., Selvin, Paul R., Zhao, Huimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20672-5
Descripción
Sumario:Genome editing critically relies on selective recognition of target sites. However, despite recent progress, the underlying search mechanism of genome-editing proteins is not fully understood in the context of cellular chromatin environments. Here, we use single-molecule imaging in live cells to directly study the behavior of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN. Our single-molecule imaging of genome-editing proteins reveals that Cas9 is less efficient in heterochromatin than TALEN because Cas9 becomes encumbered by local searches on non-specific sites in these regions. We find up to a fivefold increase in editing efficiency for TALEN compared to Cas9 in heterochromatin regions. Overall, our results show that Cas9 and TALEN use a combination of 3-D and local searches to identify target sites, and the nanoscopic granularity of local search determines the editing outcomes of the genome-editing proteins. Taken together, our results suggest that TALEN is a more efficient gene-editing tool than Cas9 for applications in heterochromatin.