Cargando…
Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review
In many areas of the world, maintaining grapevine production will require adaptation to climate change. While rigorous evaluations of adaptation strategies provide decision makers with valuable insights, those that are published often overlook major constraints, ignore local adaptive capacity, and s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.607859 |
_version_ | 1783643665626824704 |
---|---|
author | Naulleau, Audrey Gary, Christian Prévot, Laurent Hossard, Laure |
author_facet | Naulleau, Audrey Gary, Christian Prévot, Laurent Hossard, Laure |
author_sort | Naulleau, Audrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | In many areas of the world, maintaining grapevine production will require adaptation to climate change. While rigorous evaluations of adaptation strategies provide decision makers with valuable insights, those that are published often overlook major constraints, ignore local adaptive capacity, and suffer from a compartmentalization of disciplines and scales. The objective of our study was to identify current knowledge of evaluation methods and their limitations, reported in the literature. We reviewed 111 papers that evaluate adaptation strategies in the main vineyards worldwide. Evaluation approaches are analyzed through key features (e.g., climate data sources, methodology, evaluation criteria) to discuss their ability to address climate change issues, and to identify promising outcomes for climate change adaptations. We highlight the fact that combining adaptation levers in the short and long term (location, vine training, irrigation, soil, and canopy management, etc.) enables local compromises to be reached between future water availability and grapevine productivity. The main findings of the paper are three-fold: (1) the evaluation of a combination of adaptation strategies provides better solutions for adapting to climate change; (2) multi-scale studies allow local constraints and opportunities to be considered; and (3) only a small number of studies have developed multi-scale and multi-lever approaches to quantify feasibility and effectiveness of adaptation. In addition, we found that climate data sources were not systematically clearly presented, and that climate uncertainty was hardly accounted for. Moreover, only a small number of studies have assessed the economic impacts of adaptation, especially at farm scale. We conclude that the development of methodologies to evaluate adaptation strategies, considering both complementary adaptations and scales, is essential if relevant information is to be provided to the decision-makers of the wine industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7840846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78408462021-01-29 Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review Naulleau, Audrey Gary, Christian Prévot, Laurent Hossard, Laure Front Plant Sci Plant Science In many areas of the world, maintaining grapevine production will require adaptation to climate change. While rigorous evaluations of adaptation strategies provide decision makers with valuable insights, those that are published often overlook major constraints, ignore local adaptive capacity, and suffer from a compartmentalization of disciplines and scales. The objective of our study was to identify current knowledge of evaluation methods and their limitations, reported in the literature. We reviewed 111 papers that evaluate adaptation strategies in the main vineyards worldwide. Evaluation approaches are analyzed through key features (e.g., climate data sources, methodology, evaluation criteria) to discuss their ability to address climate change issues, and to identify promising outcomes for climate change adaptations. We highlight the fact that combining adaptation levers in the short and long term (location, vine training, irrigation, soil, and canopy management, etc.) enables local compromises to be reached between future water availability and grapevine productivity. The main findings of the paper are three-fold: (1) the evaluation of a combination of adaptation strategies provides better solutions for adapting to climate change; (2) multi-scale studies allow local constraints and opportunities to be considered; and (3) only a small number of studies have developed multi-scale and multi-lever approaches to quantify feasibility and effectiveness of adaptation. In addition, we found that climate data sources were not systematically clearly presented, and that climate uncertainty was hardly accounted for. Moreover, only a small number of studies have assessed the economic impacts of adaptation, especially at farm scale. We conclude that the development of methodologies to evaluate adaptation strategies, considering both complementary adaptations and scales, is essential if relevant information is to be provided to the decision-makers of the wine industry. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7840846/ /pubmed/33519859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.607859 Text en Copyright © 2021 Naulleau, Gary, Prévot and Hossard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Naulleau, Audrey Gary, Christian Prévot, Laurent Hossard, Laure Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title | Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title_full | Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title_short | Evaluating Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change in Grapevine Production–A Systematic Review |
title_sort | evaluating strategies for adaptation to climate change in grapevine production–a systematic review |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.607859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naulleauaudrey evaluatingstrategiesforadaptationtoclimatechangeingrapevineproductionasystematicreview AT garychristian evaluatingstrategiesforadaptationtoclimatechangeingrapevineproductionasystematicreview AT prevotlaurent evaluatingstrategiesforadaptationtoclimatechangeingrapevineproductionasystematicreview AT hossardlaure evaluatingstrategiesforadaptationtoclimatechangeingrapevineproductionasystematicreview |