Cargando…

The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration

Complications associated with urinary bladder augmentation provide the motivation to delineate alternative bladder tissue regenerative engineering strategies. We describe the results of varying the proportion of bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to CD34 + hematopoietic stem/progenitor c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bury, Matthew I., Fuller, Natalie J., Sturm, Renea M., Rabizadeh, Rebecca R., Nolan, Bonnie G., Barac, Milica, Edassery, Sonia S., Chan, Yvonne Y., Sharma, Arun K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81939-5
_version_ 1783643680155893760
author Bury, Matthew I.
Fuller, Natalie J.
Sturm, Renea M.
Rabizadeh, Rebecca R.
Nolan, Bonnie G.
Barac, Milica
Edassery, Sonia S.
Chan, Yvonne Y.
Sharma, Arun K.
author_facet Bury, Matthew I.
Fuller, Natalie J.
Sturm, Renea M.
Rabizadeh, Rebecca R.
Nolan, Bonnie G.
Barac, Milica
Edassery, Sonia S.
Chan, Yvonne Y.
Sharma, Arun K.
author_sort Bury, Matthew I.
collection PubMed
description Complications associated with urinary bladder augmentation provide the motivation to delineate alternative bladder tissue regenerative engineering strategies. We describe the results of varying the proportion of bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to CD34 + hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) co-seeded onto synthetic POC [poly(1,8 octamethylene citrate)] or small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffolds and their contribution to bladder tissue regeneration. Human BM MSCs and CD34 + HSPCs were co-seeded onto POC or SIS scaffolds at cell ratios of 50 K CD34 + HSPCs/15 K MSCs (CD34-50/MSC15); 50 K CD34 + HSPCs/30 K MSCs (CD34-50/MSC30); 100 K CD34 + HSPCs/15 K MSCs (CD34-100/MSC15); and 100 K CD34 + HSPCs/30 K MSCs (CD34-100/MSC30), in male (M/POC; M/SIS; n = 6/cell seeded scaffold) and female (F/POC; F/SIS; n = 6/cell seeded scaffold) nude rats (n = 96 total animals). Explanted scaffold/composite augmented bladder tissue underwent quantitative morphometrics following histological staining taking into account the presence (S+) or absence (S−) of bladder stones. Urodynamic studies were also performed. Regarding regenerated tissue vascularization, an upward shift was detected for some higher seeded density groups including the CD34-100/MSC30 groups [F/POC S− CD34-100/MSC30 230.5 ± 12.4; F/POC S+ CD34-100/MSC30 245.6 ± 23.4; F/SIS S+ CD34-100/MSC30 278.1; F/SIS S− CD34-100/MSC30 187.4 ± 8.1; (vessels/mm(2))]. Similarly, a potential trend toward increased levels of percent muscle (≥ 45% muscle) with higher seeding densities was observed for F/POC S− [CD34-50/MSC30 48.8 ± 2.2; CD34-100/MSC15 53.9 ± 2.8; CD34-100/MSC30 50.7 ± 1.7] and for F/SIS S− [CD34-100/MSC15 47.1 ± 1.6; CD34-100/MSC30 51.2 ± 2.3]. As a potential trend, higher MSC/CD34 + HSPCs cell seeding densities generally tended to increase levels of tissue vascularization and aided with bladder muscle growth. Data suggest that increasing cell seeding density has the potential to enhance bladder tissue regeneration in our model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7840904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78409042021-01-28 The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration Bury, Matthew I. Fuller, Natalie J. Sturm, Renea M. Rabizadeh, Rebecca R. Nolan, Bonnie G. Barac, Milica Edassery, Sonia S. Chan, Yvonne Y. Sharma, Arun K. Sci Rep Article Complications associated with urinary bladder augmentation provide the motivation to delineate alternative bladder tissue regenerative engineering strategies. We describe the results of varying the proportion of bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to CD34 + hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) co-seeded onto synthetic POC [poly(1,8 octamethylene citrate)] or small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffolds and their contribution to bladder tissue regeneration. Human BM MSCs and CD34 + HSPCs were co-seeded onto POC or SIS scaffolds at cell ratios of 50 K CD34 + HSPCs/15 K MSCs (CD34-50/MSC15); 50 K CD34 + HSPCs/30 K MSCs (CD34-50/MSC30); 100 K CD34 + HSPCs/15 K MSCs (CD34-100/MSC15); and 100 K CD34 + HSPCs/30 K MSCs (CD34-100/MSC30), in male (M/POC; M/SIS; n = 6/cell seeded scaffold) and female (F/POC; F/SIS; n = 6/cell seeded scaffold) nude rats (n = 96 total animals). Explanted scaffold/composite augmented bladder tissue underwent quantitative morphometrics following histological staining taking into account the presence (S+) or absence (S−) of bladder stones. Urodynamic studies were also performed. Regarding regenerated tissue vascularization, an upward shift was detected for some higher seeded density groups including the CD34-100/MSC30 groups [F/POC S− CD34-100/MSC30 230.5 ± 12.4; F/POC S+ CD34-100/MSC30 245.6 ± 23.4; F/SIS S+ CD34-100/MSC30 278.1; F/SIS S− CD34-100/MSC30 187.4 ± 8.1; (vessels/mm(2))]. Similarly, a potential trend toward increased levels of percent muscle (≥ 45% muscle) with higher seeding densities was observed for F/POC S− [CD34-50/MSC30 48.8 ± 2.2; CD34-100/MSC15 53.9 ± 2.8; CD34-100/MSC30 50.7 ± 1.7] and for F/SIS S− [CD34-100/MSC15 47.1 ± 1.6; CD34-100/MSC30 51.2 ± 2.3]. As a potential trend, higher MSC/CD34 + HSPCs cell seeding densities generally tended to increase levels of tissue vascularization and aided with bladder muscle growth. Data suggest that increasing cell seeding density has the potential to enhance bladder tissue regeneration in our model. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7840904/ /pubmed/33504876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81939-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bury, Matthew I.
Fuller, Natalie J.
Sturm, Renea M.
Rabizadeh, Rebecca R.
Nolan, Bonnie G.
Barac, Milica
Edassery, Sonia S.
Chan, Yvonne Y.
Sharma, Arun K.
The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title_full The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title_fullStr The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title_full_unstemmed The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title_short The effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
title_sort effects of bone marrow stem and progenitor cell seeding on urinary bladder tissue regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81939-5
work_keys_str_mv AT burymatthewi theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT fullernataliej theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT sturmreneam theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT rabizadehrebeccar theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT nolanbonnieg theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT baracmilica theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT edasserysonias theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT chanyvonney theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT sharmaarunk theeffectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT burymatthewi effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT fullernataliej effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT sturmreneam effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT rabizadehrebeccar effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT nolanbonnieg effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT baracmilica effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT edasserysonias effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT chanyvonney effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration
AT sharmaarunk effectsofbonemarrowstemandprogenitorcellseedingonurinarybladdertissueregeneration