Cargando…

The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The presence of bony erosions in patients with RA is a marker of disease severity and once present they are largely irreversible. Previous studies have shown that the presence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) antibodies is associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minocha, Amal, Kukran, Sebi, Yee, Philip, Nisar, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521571
http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.4.393
_version_ 1783643727265267712
author Minocha, Amal
Kukran, Sebi
Yee, Philip
Nisar, Muhammad
author_facet Minocha, Amal
Kukran, Sebi
Yee, Philip
Nisar, Muhammad
author_sort Minocha, Amal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The presence of bony erosions in patients with RA is a marker of disease severity and once present they are largely irreversible. Previous studies have shown that the presence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) antibodies is associated with erosive burden. The aim of our study is to determine the strength of relationship between antibody status and the presence of radiographic erosions at diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with RA at a large university teaching hospital between January 1981 and December 2018. Clinical records were reviewed to determine antibody status, diagnosis date, duration of symptoms, DAS-28, age, ethnicity and whether the 1987 RA criteria was met. The presence of erosions at diagnosis were determined from plain film radiographs reports of hands and feet of patients. Statistical analysis was done using a Chi Square Model and Mann Whitney two-tailed U test. RESULTS: There were 774 patients diagnosed with RA in our cohort. 367 (47%) of them were RF+/ACPA+, 87 (11%) were RF+/ACPA-, 66 (9%) were RF-/ACPA+ and 254 (33%) were antibody negative. 127 patients had erosions at the time of diagnosis. Patients in the double positive group had a significantly higher (p=0.003) erosion burden compared to the double negative group i.e. 21.5% in RF+/ACPA+ versus 11.0% in RF-/ACPA- group. The erosion burdens in RF+/ACPA- and RF-/ACPA+ groups were 13.7% and 12.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that patients RF+/ACPA+ have nearly two-fold higher incidence of radiographic erosions than patients who are RF-/ACPA-.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7841098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78410982021-01-28 The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Minocha, Amal Kukran, Sebi Yee, Philip Nisar, Muhammad Mediterr J Rheumatol Original Paper BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The presence of bony erosions in patients with RA is a marker of disease severity and once present they are largely irreversible. Previous studies have shown that the presence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) antibodies is associated with erosive burden. The aim of our study is to determine the strength of relationship between antibody status and the presence of radiographic erosions at diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with RA at a large university teaching hospital between January 1981 and December 2018. Clinical records were reviewed to determine antibody status, diagnosis date, duration of symptoms, DAS-28, age, ethnicity and whether the 1987 RA criteria was met. The presence of erosions at diagnosis were determined from plain film radiographs reports of hands and feet of patients. Statistical analysis was done using a Chi Square Model and Mann Whitney two-tailed U test. RESULTS: There were 774 patients diagnosed with RA in our cohort. 367 (47%) of them were RF+/ACPA+, 87 (11%) were RF+/ACPA-, 66 (9%) were RF-/ACPA+ and 254 (33%) were antibody negative. 127 patients had erosions at the time of diagnosis. Patients in the double positive group had a significantly higher (p=0.003) erosion burden compared to the double negative group i.e. 21.5% in RF+/ACPA+ versus 11.0% in RF-/ACPA- group. The erosion burdens in RF+/ACPA- and RF-/ACPA+ groups were 13.7% and 12.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that patients RF+/ACPA+ have nearly two-fold higher incidence of radiographic erosions than patients who are RF-/ACPA-. The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7841098/ /pubmed/33521571 http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.4.393 Text en © 2020 The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under and Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Minocha, Amal
Kukran, Sebi
Yee, Philip
Nisar, Muhammad
The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short The Differential Effect of Antibodies on Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort differential effect of antibodies on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521571
http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.4.393
work_keys_str_mv AT minochaamal thedifferentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT kukransebi thedifferentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT yeephilip thedifferentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT nisarmuhammad thedifferentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT minochaamal differentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT kukransebi differentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT yeephilip differentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis
AT nisarmuhammad differentialeffectofantibodiesonradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritis