Cargando…

Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report

BACKGROUND: Penile urethral stones are very and constitutes less than 1% of the urinary tract stones and commoner in males. They are either primary or secondary. The clinical diagnosis require high index of suspicion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old male was complaining of penile pain, weak urinary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabali, Shakir Saleem, Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33508614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.01.069
_version_ 1783643756404146176
author Jabali, Shakir Saleem
Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad
author_facet Jabali, Shakir Saleem
Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad
author_sort Jabali, Shakir Saleem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penile urethral stones are very and constitutes less than 1% of the urinary tract stones and commoner in males. They are either primary or secondary. The clinical diagnosis require high index of suspicion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old male was complaining of penile pain, weak urinary stream and dribbling at the end of micturition for 2 months, later on he developed severe dysuria and a tender nodule over the dorsal penile surface. An attempted urethral catheterization was failed. There was no history of urethral trauma or instrumentation. Examination of genitalia revealed a normal meatus with a fistula at dorsal mid penile shaft and the urine were coming out from that opening with surrounding redness and edema with palpable firm nodule in the penile shaft. A pelvic x-ray revealed a mid-urethral radiopaque shadow, cystoscopy revealed an impacted stone in mid-bulbar urethra, attempts of stone extraction was failed. An open ventral urethral incision was made and the stone was removed, dorsal fistulectomy and repair was performed. Foley's catheter was placed and removed later after 21 days. The patient had uneventful postoperative period and the follow up was done up to 6 months with no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The clinical diagnosis of penile urethral stones require high index of suspicion. Management options are variable depending on impaction site, the size, and associated urethral pathologies. The fistula tract require excised and repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7841221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78412212021-02-02 Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report Jabali, Shakir Saleem Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Penile urethral stones are very and constitutes less than 1% of the urinary tract stones and commoner in males. They are either primary or secondary. The clinical diagnosis require high index of suspicion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old male was complaining of penile pain, weak urinary stream and dribbling at the end of micturition for 2 months, later on he developed severe dysuria and a tender nodule over the dorsal penile surface. An attempted urethral catheterization was failed. There was no history of urethral trauma or instrumentation. Examination of genitalia revealed a normal meatus with a fistula at dorsal mid penile shaft and the urine were coming out from that opening with surrounding redness and edema with palpable firm nodule in the penile shaft. A pelvic x-ray revealed a mid-urethral radiopaque shadow, cystoscopy revealed an impacted stone in mid-bulbar urethra, attempts of stone extraction was failed. An open ventral urethral incision was made and the stone was removed, dorsal fistulectomy and repair was performed. Foley's catheter was placed and removed later after 21 days. The patient had uneventful postoperative period and the follow up was done up to 6 months with no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The clinical diagnosis of penile urethral stones require high index of suspicion. Management options are variable depending on impaction site, the size, and associated urethral pathologies. The fistula tract require excised and repair. Elsevier 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7841221/ /pubmed/33508614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.01.069 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Jabali, Shakir Saleem
Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad
Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title_full Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title_fullStr Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title_full_unstemmed Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title_short Dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: Case report
title_sort dorsal urethro-cutaneous fistula caused by an impacted stone at the bulbar urethra: case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33508614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.01.069
work_keys_str_mv AT jabalishakirsaleem dorsalurethrocutaneousfistulacausedbyanimpactedstoneatthebulbarurethracasereport
AT mohammedayadahmad dorsalurethrocutaneousfistulacausedbyanimpactedstoneatthebulbarurethracasereport