Cargando…
Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features
OBJECTIVE: The Paediatric Admission Guidance in the Emergency Department (PAGE) score is an assessment tool currently in development that helps predict hospital admission using components including patient characteristics, vital signs (heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664 |
_version_ | 1783643815553269760 |
---|---|
author | Heal, Calvin Cotterill, Sarah Rowland, Andrew Graeme Garratt, Natalie Long, Tony Brown, Stephen O'Connor, Grainne Rishton, Chloe Woby, Steve Roland, Damian |
author_facet | Heal, Calvin Cotterill, Sarah Rowland, Andrew Graeme Garratt, Natalie Long, Tony Brown, Stephen O'Connor, Grainne Rishton, Chloe Woby, Steve Roland, Damian |
author_sort | Heal, Calvin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Paediatric Admission Guidance in the Emergency Department (PAGE) score is an assessment tool currently in development that helps predict hospital admission using components including patient characteristics, vital signs (heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) and clinical features (eg, breathing, behaviour and nurse judgement). It aims to assist in safe admission and discharge decision making in environments such as emergency departments and urgent care centres. Determining the inter-rater reliability of scoring tools such as PAGE can be difficult. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of seven clinical components of the PAGE Score. DESIGN: Inter-rater reliability was measured by each patient having their clinical components recorded by two separate raters in succession. The first rater was the assessing nurse, and the second rater was a research nurse. SETTING: Two emergency departments and one urgent care centre in the North West of England. Measurements were recorded over 1 week; data were collected for half a day at each of the three sites. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of 90 paediatric attendees (aged 0–16 years), 30 from each of the three sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two independent measures for each child were compared using kappa or prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Bland-Altman plots were also constructed for continuous measurements. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate (0.62 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.74) weighted kappa) to very good (0.98 (95% CI 95 to 0.99) weighted kappa) for all measurements except ‘nurse judgement’ for which agreement was fair (0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.50 PABAK). Complete information from both raters on all the clinical components of the PAGE score were available for 73 children (81%). These total scores showed good’ inter-rater reliability (0.64 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.74) weighted kappa). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest different nurses would demonstrate good inter-rater reliability when collecting acute assessments needed for the PAGE score, reinforcing the applicability of the tool. The importance of determining reliability in scoring systems is highlighted and a suitable methodology was presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7841473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78414732021-02-04 Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features Heal, Calvin Cotterill, Sarah Rowland, Andrew Graeme Garratt, Natalie Long, Tony Brown, Stephen O'Connor, Grainne Rishton, Chloe Woby, Steve Roland, Damian Arch Dis Child Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Paediatric Admission Guidance in the Emergency Department (PAGE) score is an assessment tool currently in development that helps predict hospital admission using components including patient characteristics, vital signs (heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) and clinical features (eg, breathing, behaviour and nurse judgement). It aims to assist in safe admission and discharge decision making in environments such as emergency departments and urgent care centres. Determining the inter-rater reliability of scoring tools such as PAGE can be difficult. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of seven clinical components of the PAGE Score. DESIGN: Inter-rater reliability was measured by each patient having their clinical components recorded by two separate raters in succession. The first rater was the assessing nurse, and the second rater was a research nurse. SETTING: Two emergency departments and one urgent care centre in the North West of England. Measurements were recorded over 1 week; data were collected for half a day at each of the three sites. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of 90 paediatric attendees (aged 0–16 years), 30 from each of the three sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two independent measures for each child were compared using kappa or prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Bland-Altman plots were also constructed for continuous measurements. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate (0.62 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.74) weighted kappa) to very good (0.98 (95% CI 95 to 0.99) weighted kappa) for all measurements except ‘nurse judgement’ for which agreement was fair (0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.50 PABAK). Complete information from both raters on all the clinical components of the PAGE score were available for 73 children (81%). These total scores showed good’ inter-rater reliability (0.64 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.74) weighted kappa). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest different nurses would demonstrate good inter-rater reliability when collecting acute assessments needed for the PAGE score, reinforcing the applicability of the tool. The importance of determining reliability in scoring systems is highlighted and a suitable methodology was presented. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7841473/ /pubmed/32988814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Heal, Calvin Cotterill, Sarah Rowland, Andrew Graeme Garratt, Natalie Long, Tony Brown, Stephen O'Connor, Grainne Rishton, Chloe Woby, Steve Roland, Damian Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title | Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title_full | Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title_fullStr | Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title_short | Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
title_sort | inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healcalvin interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT cotterillsarah interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT rowlandandrewgraeme interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT garrattnatalie interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT longtony interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT brownstephen interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT oconnorgrainne interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT rishtonchloe interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT wobysteve interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures AT rolanddamian interraterreliabilityofpaediatricemergencyassessmentphysiologicalandclinicalfeatures |