Cargando…

Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?

AIMS: Management of inflammatory renal disease (IRD) can still be technically challenging for laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with IRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xudong, Wang, Hanbo, Xiang, Yuzhu, Jin, Xunbo, Jiang, Shaobo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220984046
_version_ 1783643853139476480
author Guo, Xudong
Wang, Hanbo
Xiang, Yuzhu
Jin, Xunbo
Jiang, Shaobo
author_facet Guo, Xudong
Wang, Hanbo
Xiang, Yuzhu
Jin, Xunbo
Jiang, Shaobo
author_sort Guo, Xudong
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Management of inflammatory renal disease (IRD) can still be technically challenging for laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with IRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 107 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) for IRD from January 2008 to March 2020, including pyonephrosis, renal tuberculosis, hydronephrosis, and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative recovery and complications were compared between the LN and HALN groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the independent predictors of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-five subjects in the LN group and 52 subjects in the HALN group were enrolled in this study. In the LN group, laparoscopic nephrectomy was successfully performed in 50 patients (90.9%), while four (7.3%) patients were converted to HALN and one (1.8%) case was converted to open procedure. In HALN group, operations were completed in 51 (98.1%) patients and conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.9%). The LN group had a shorter median incision length (5 cm versus 7 cm, p < 0.01) but a longer median operative duration (140 min versus 105 min, p < 0.01) than the HALN group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, intraoperative complication rate, postoperative complication rate, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that severe perinephric adhesions was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both LN and HALN appear to be safe and feasible for IRD. As a still minimally invasive approach, HALN provided an alternative to IRD or when conversion was needed in LN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7841654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78416542021-02-24 Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach? Guo, Xudong Wang, Hanbo Xiang, Yuzhu Jin, Xunbo Jiang, Shaobo Ther Adv Urol Original Research AIMS: Management of inflammatory renal disease (IRD) can still be technically challenging for laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with IRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 107 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) for IRD from January 2008 to March 2020, including pyonephrosis, renal tuberculosis, hydronephrosis, and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative recovery and complications were compared between the LN and HALN groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the independent predictors of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-five subjects in the LN group and 52 subjects in the HALN group were enrolled in this study. In the LN group, laparoscopic nephrectomy was successfully performed in 50 patients (90.9%), while four (7.3%) patients were converted to HALN and one (1.8%) case was converted to open procedure. In HALN group, operations were completed in 51 (98.1%) patients and conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.9%). The LN group had a shorter median incision length (5 cm versus 7 cm, p < 0.01) but a longer median operative duration (140 min versus 105 min, p < 0.01) than the HALN group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, intraoperative complication rate, postoperative complication rate, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that severe perinephric adhesions was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both LN and HALN appear to be safe and feasible for IRD. As a still minimally invasive approach, HALN provided an alternative to IRD or when conversion was needed in LN. SAGE Publications 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7841654/ /pubmed/33633798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220984046 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Guo, Xudong
Wang, Hanbo
Xiang, Yuzhu
Jin, Xunbo
Jiang, Shaobo
Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title_full Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title_fullStr Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title_short Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
title_sort comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220984046
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxudong comparisonoflaparoscopicandhandassistedlaparoscopicnephrectomyforinflammatoryrenaldiseasewhichisthepreferredapproach
AT wanghanbo comparisonoflaparoscopicandhandassistedlaparoscopicnephrectomyforinflammatoryrenaldiseasewhichisthepreferredapproach
AT xiangyuzhu comparisonoflaparoscopicandhandassistedlaparoscopicnephrectomyforinflammatoryrenaldiseasewhichisthepreferredapproach
AT jinxunbo comparisonoflaparoscopicandhandassistedlaparoscopicnephrectomyforinflammatoryrenaldiseasewhichisthepreferredapproach
AT jiangshaobo comparisonoflaparoscopicandhandassistedlaparoscopicnephrectomyforinflammatoryrenaldiseasewhichisthepreferredapproach