Cargando…
The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets
Inflammation and necrosis can appear in pigs in several parts of the body simultaneously. The signs can affect newborns, suckling piglets and older pigs, and recent studies suggest that the syndrome is primarily endogenous. Inflammation and necrosis indicate impaired animal welfare, and thus should...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33509289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00194-2 |
_version_ | 1783643925329739776 |
---|---|
author | Kuehling, Josef Eisenhofer, Kathrin Lechner, Mirjam Becker, Sabrina Willems, Hermann Reiner, Gerald |
author_facet | Kuehling, Josef Eisenhofer, Kathrin Lechner, Mirjam Becker, Sabrina Willems, Hermann Reiner, Gerald |
author_sort | Kuehling, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inflammation and necrosis can appear in pigs in several parts of the body simultaneously. The signs can affect newborns, suckling piglets and older pigs, and recent studies suggest that the syndrome is primarily endogenous. Inflammation and necrosis indicate impaired animal welfare, and thus should be controlled in pig production. This can be achieved by improving husbandry conditions. However, the variation in signs also appears to have a genetic component. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the effects of different boars from the Duroc and Pietrain breeds on the prevalence of swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in their offspring. For this purpose, 646 suckling pigs from 39 sows (two herds) and 19 boars were made available. On the third day of life, the piglets were examined for clinical signs of inflammation and necrosis at tail base, tail tip, ears, face, teats, navel and claws. For the evaluation, we included the boar within the breed and the breed as fixed effects and the sow within the herd as random effects. More than 70% of the piglets were affected at the tail base, ears, coronary bands and heels. Bristle loss, swelling, redness, venous congestion and claw wall bleeding occurred most frequently. Exudation and necrosis affected fewer piglets. None of the piglets was completely free from signs of SINS. Offspring from Duroc boars had significantly lower SINS scores (4.87 ± 0.44) than offspring from Pietrain boars (10.13 ± 0.12). Within the Pietrain breed, significant effects of the boar were observed on inflammation and necrosis levels. Under the present study conditions, using Duroc boars instead of Pietrain boars resulted in a 59% reduction in the SINS scores of their offspring. The SINS score in the offspring of the most favourable Pietrain boar was almost 40% lower than that of offspring in the least favourable. These findings confirm considerable genetic effects on the outcome of SINS under a given husbandry. Further studies are necessary to characterise the genetic effects in detail and to make them useful to combat the syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7842003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78420032021-01-28 The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets Kuehling, Josef Eisenhofer, Kathrin Lechner, Mirjam Becker, Sabrina Willems, Hermann Reiner, Gerald Porcine Health Manag Research Inflammation and necrosis can appear in pigs in several parts of the body simultaneously. The signs can affect newborns, suckling piglets and older pigs, and recent studies suggest that the syndrome is primarily endogenous. Inflammation and necrosis indicate impaired animal welfare, and thus should be controlled in pig production. This can be achieved by improving husbandry conditions. However, the variation in signs also appears to have a genetic component. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the effects of different boars from the Duroc and Pietrain breeds on the prevalence of swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in their offspring. For this purpose, 646 suckling pigs from 39 sows (two herds) and 19 boars were made available. On the third day of life, the piglets were examined for clinical signs of inflammation and necrosis at tail base, tail tip, ears, face, teats, navel and claws. For the evaluation, we included the boar within the breed and the breed as fixed effects and the sow within the herd as random effects. More than 70% of the piglets were affected at the tail base, ears, coronary bands and heels. Bristle loss, swelling, redness, venous congestion and claw wall bleeding occurred most frequently. Exudation and necrosis affected fewer piglets. None of the piglets was completely free from signs of SINS. Offspring from Duroc boars had significantly lower SINS scores (4.87 ± 0.44) than offspring from Pietrain boars (10.13 ± 0.12). Within the Pietrain breed, significant effects of the boar were observed on inflammation and necrosis levels. Under the present study conditions, using Duroc boars instead of Pietrain boars resulted in a 59% reduction in the SINS scores of their offspring. The SINS score in the offspring of the most favourable Pietrain boar was almost 40% lower than that of offspring in the least favourable. These findings confirm considerable genetic effects on the outcome of SINS under a given husbandry. Further studies are necessary to characterise the genetic effects in detail and to make them useful to combat the syndrome. BioMed Central 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7842003/ /pubmed/33509289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00194-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kuehling, Josef Eisenhofer, Kathrin Lechner, Mirjam Becker, Sabrina Willems, Hermann Reiner, Gerald The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title | The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title_full | The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title_fullStr | The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title_short | The effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
title_sort | effects of boar on susceptibility to swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33509289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00194-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuehlingjosef theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT eisenhoferkathrin theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT lechnermirjam theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT beckersabrina theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT willemshermann theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT reinergerald theeffectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT kuehlingjosef effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT eisenhoferkathrin effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT lechnermirjam effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT beckersabrina effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT willemshermann effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets AT reinergerald effectsofboaronsusceptibilitytoswineinflammationandnecrosissyndromeinpiglets |