Cargando…

The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam

To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Shuhao, Zhu, Hongqing, Huo, Yujia, Zhang, Yilong, Wang, Haoran, Li, Feng, Wang, Xiaokuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199
_version_ 1783644051847774208
author Fang, Shuhao
Zhu, Hongqing
Huo, Yujia
Zhang, Yilong
Wang, Haoran
Li, Feng
Wang, Xiaokuan
author_facet Fang, Shuhao
Zhu, Hongqing
Huo, Yujia
Zhang, Yilong
Wang, Haoran
Li, Feng
Wang, Xiaokuan
author_sort Fang, Shuhao
collection PubMed
description To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam under deeply buried conditions. The optimal strip width range is obtained according to the change law of strain during the mining process of the underside protective seam in a similar model experiment. The change law of the expansion of the protected coal seam is obtained and the fitting surfaces among the dip angle and strip width of the coal seam with the protection distance and pressure relief angle along the strike and dip of the protected coal seam are established according to the numerical simulation results of underside protective seam mining. It is concluded that the best pressure relief effect can be achieved when the dip angle is 16.7° and the strip width is 70 m. According to the stability threshold of coal pillars considered in strip mining theory, the coal pillar width is calculated to be 50 m. Similarity model experiments and numerical simulations of protected coal seam mining verify the pressure relief effect of the designed protective seam strip width and pillar width. A calculation method of the protective seam strip width, position and pillar width required by the specific width of the protected seam is proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7842979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78429792021-02-04 The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam Fang, Shuhao Zhu, Hongqing Huo, Yujia Zhang, Yilong Wang, Haoran Li, Feng Wang, Xiaokuan PLoS One Research Article To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam under deeply buried conditions. The optimal strip width range is obtained according to the change law of strain during the mining process of the underside protective seam in a similar model experiment. The change law of the expansion of the protected coal seam is obtained and the fitting surfaces among the dip angle and strip width of the coal seam with the protection distance and pressure relief angle along the strike and dip of the protected coal seam are established according to the numerical simulation results of underside protective seam mining. It is concluded that the best pressure relief effect can be achieved when the dip angle is 16.7° and the strip width is 70 m. According to the stability threshold of coal pillars considered in strip mining theory, the coal pillar width is calculated to be 50 m. Similarity model experiments and numerical simulations of protected coal seam mining verify the pressure relief effect of the designed protective seam strip width and pillar width. A calculation method of the protective seam strip width, position and pillar width required by the specific width of the protected seam is proposed. Public Library of Science 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7842979/ /pubmed/33507939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199 Text en © 2021 Fang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fang, Shuhao
Zhu, Hongqing
Huo, Yujia
Zhang, Yilong
Wang, Haoran
Li, Feng
Wang, Xiaokuan
The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title_full The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title_fullStr The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title_full_unstemmed The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title_short The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
title_sort pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199
work_keys_str_mv AT fangshuhao thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT zhuhongqing thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT huoyujia thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT zhangyilong thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT wanghaoran thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT lifeng thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT wangxiaokuan thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT fangshuhao pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT zhuhongqing pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT huoyujia pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT zhangyilong pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT wanghaoran pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT lifeng pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam
AT wangxiaokuan pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam