Cargando…
The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam
To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199 |
_version_ | 1783644051847774208 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Shuhao Zhu, Hongqing Huo, Yujia Zhang, Yilong Wang, Haoran Li, Feng Wang, Xiaokuan |
author_facet | Fang, Shuhao Zhu, Hongqing Huo, Yujia Zhang, Yilong Wang, Haoran Li, Feng Wang, Xiaokuan |
author_sort | Fang, Shuhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam under deeply buried conditions. The optimal strip width range is obtained according to the change law of strain during the mining process of the underside protective seam in a similar model experiment. The change law of the expansion of the protected coal seam is obtained and the fitting surfaces among the dip angle and strip width of the coal seam with the protection distance and pressure relief angle along the strike and dip of the protected coal seam are established according to the numerical simulation results of underside protective seam mining. It is concluded that the best pressure relief effect can be achieved when the dip angle is 16.7° and the strip width is 70 m. According to the stability threshold of coal pillars considered in strip mining theory, the coal pillar width is calculated to be 50 m. Similarity model experiments and numerical simulations of protected coal seam mining verify the pressure relief effect of the designed protective seam strip width and pillar width. A calculation method of the protective seam strip width, position and pillar width required by the specific width of the protected seam is proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7842979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78429792021-02-04 The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam Fang, Shuhao Zhu, Hongqing Huo, Yujia Zhang, Yilong Wang, Haoran Li, Feng Wang, Xiaokuan PLoS One Research Article To design underside protective seam strip layout. Similarity model experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical calculations are used to quantitatively study the pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and coal pillar widths of a thin underside protective seam under deeply buried conditions. The optimal strip width range is obtained according to the change law of strain during the mining process of the underside protective seam in a similar model experiment. The change law of the expansion of the protected coal seam is obtained and the fitting surfaces among the dip angle and strip width of the coal seam with the protection distance and pressure relief angle along the strike and dip of the protected coal seam are established according to the numerical simulation results of underside protective seam mining. It is concluded that the best pressure relief effect can be achieved when the dip angle is 16.7° and the strip width is 70 m. According to the stability threshold of coal pillars considered in strip mining theory, the coal pillar width is calculated to be 50 m. Similarity model experiments and numerical simulations of protected coal seam mining verify the pressure relief effect of the designed protective seam strip width and pillar width. A calculation method of the protective seam strip width, position and pillar width required by the specific width of the protected seam is proposed. Public Library of Science 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7842979/ /pubmed/33507939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199 Text en © 2021 Fang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fang, Shuhao Zhu, Hongqing Huo, Yujia Zhang, Yilong Wang, Haoran Li, Feng Wang, Xiaokuan The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title | The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title_full | The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title_fullStr | The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title_full_unstemmed | The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title_short | The pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
title_sort | pressure relief protection effect of different strip widths, dip angles and pillar widths of an underside protective seam |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangshuhao thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT zhuhongqing thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT huoyujia thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT zhangyilong thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT wanghaoran thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT lifeng thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT wangxiaokuan thepressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT fangshuhao pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT zhuhongqing pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT huoyujia pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT zhangyilong pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT wanghaoran pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT lifeng pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam AT wangxiaokuan pressurereliefprotectioneffectofdifferentstripwidthsdipanglesandpillarwidthsofanundersideprotectiveseam |