Cargando…
A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study
BACKGROUND: In Canada, wait times for access to specialized rheumatology services have increased, leading to new strategies to improve timely care; electronic consultations (eConsults) enable providers to ask specialists a clinical question using a secure platform, often reducing the need for a face...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Joule Inc. or its licensors
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436454 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200025 |
_version_ | 1783644069341167616 |
---|---|
author | Keely, Erin Rostom, Krista Smith, Douglas Liddy, Clare |
author_facet | Keely, Erin Rostom, Krista Smith, Douglas Liddy, Clare |
author_sort | Keely, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Canada, wait times for access to specialized rheumatology services have increased, leading to new strategies to improve timely care; electronic consultations (eConsults) enable providers to ask specialists a clinical question using a secure platform, often reducing the need for a face-to-face visit. In this study, we sought to compare the types of referrals received through fax versus eConsult and to determine whether faxed referrals could be addressed using eConsult. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of consecutive faxed referrals sent to a tertiary care centre between Feb. 1 and Mar. 6, 2017, and a convenience sample of eConsults directed to rheumatology between Feb. 1, 2015, and Sept. 30, 2016, through the Champlain BASE eConsult Service, an Ontario-based service. We reviewed all referrals and categorized them by clinical content and question type. A rheumatologist with experience completing eConsult referrals assessed faxed referrals for their suitability to be answered through eConsults. Descriptive statistics were generated. RESULTS: We analyzed 300 consecutive faxed referrals and 300 (of 470) eConsult referrals. Faxed questions more often pertained to rheumatoid arthritis (32/300 [10.7%] v. 17/300 [5.7%]), systemic lupus erythematosus (24/300 [8.0%] v. 10/300 [3.3%]), and polyarthritis (30/300 [10.0%] v. 18/300 [6.0%]). eConsults more often addressed abnormal serology without joint symptoms (27/300 [9.0%] v. 8/300 [2.7%]) and gout (15/300 [5.0%] v. 4/300 [1.3%]). Faxed referrals were more likely to have no specific question (116/300 [38.7%]), and eConsults were more likely to have more than 1 question posed (99/300 [33.0%]) and a drug-related question (67/300 [22.3%]). The rheumatologist identified potential benefit from eConsult in 216/300 (72.0%) faxed referrals and 55/59 (93.2%) declined faxed referrals. INTERPRETATION: Despite differences in diagnosis between eConsults and faxed referrals, most faxed referrals showed the potential to be addressed through eConsult. Using eConsult may allow primary care providers to obtain answers to questions without requesting a face-to-face specialist referral, or provide support for patients awaiting face-to-face consultation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7843073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Joule Inc. or its licensors |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78430732021-01-30 A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study Keely, Erin Rostom, Krista Smith, Douglas Liddy, Clare CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: In Canada, wait times for access to specialized rheumatology services have increased, leading to new strategies to improve timely care; electronic consultations (eConsults) enable providers to ask specialists a clinical question using a secure platform, often reducing the need for a face-to-face visit. In this study, we sought to compare the types of referrals received through fax versus eConsult and to determine whether faxed referrals could be addressed using eConsult. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of consecutive faxed referrals sent to a tertiary care centre between Feb. 1 and Mar. 6, 2017, and a convenience sample of eConsults directed to rheumatology between Feb. 1, 2015, and Sept. 30, 2016, through the Champlain BASE eConsult Service, an Ontario-based service. We reviewed all referrals and categorized them by clinical content and question type. A rheumatologist with experience completing eConsult referrals assessed faxed referrals for their suitability to be answered through eConsults. Descriptive statistics were generated. RESULTS: We analyzed 300 consecutive faxed referrals and 300 (of 470) eConsult referrals. Faxed questions more often pertained to rheumatoid arthritis (32/300 [10.7%] v. 17/300 [5.7%]), systemic lupus erythematosus (24/300 [8.0%] v. 10/300 [3.3%]), and polyarthritis (30/300 [10.0%] v. 18/300 [6.0%]). eConsults more often addressed abnormal serology without joint symptoms (27/300 [9.0%] v. 8/300 [2.7%]) and gout (15/300 [5.0%] v. 4/300 [1.3%]). Faxed referrals were more likely to have no specific question (116/300 [38.7%]), and eConsults were more likely to have more than 1 question posed (99/300 [33.0%]) and a drug-related question (67/300 [22.3%]). The rheumatologist identified potential benefit from eConsult in 216/300 (72.0%) faxed referrals and 55/59 (93.2%) declined faxed referrals. INTERPRETATION: Despite differences in diagnosis between eConsults and faxed referrals, most faxed referrals showed the potential to be addressed through eConsult. Using eConsult may allow primary care providers to obtain answers to questions without requesting a face-to-face specialist referral, or provide support for patients awaiting face-to-face consultation. Joule Inc. or its licensors 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7843073/ /pubmed/33436454 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200025 Text en Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Keely, Erin Rostom, Krista Smith, Douglas Liddy, Clare A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title | A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title_full | A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title_fullStr | A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title_short | A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
title_sort | comparison of faxed referrals and econsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436454 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keelyerin acomparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT rostomkrista acomparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT smithdouglas acomparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT liddyclare acomparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT keelyerin comparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT rostomkrista comparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT smithdouglas comparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy AT liddyclare comparisonoffaxedreferralsandeconsultquestionsforrheumatologyreferralsadescriptivestudy |