Cargando…

Evaluation of conductivity‐based osmolality measurement in urine using the Sysmex UF5000

BACKGROUND: Automated flow cytometry‐based urine analyzer is increasingly being used to identify and enumerate cells and particles in urine specimens. It measures electrical conductivity which could be transformed to osmolality. Using this machine, all urine specimens could be screened for osmolalit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Dong‐Won, Lee, Sun Min, Moon, Soo Young, Kim, In‐Suk, Chang, Chulhun L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23586
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Automated flow cytometry‐based urine analyzer is increasingly being used to identify and enumerate cells and particles in urine specimens. It measures electrical conductivity which could be transformed to osmolality. Using this machine, all urine specimens could be screened for osmolality without requiring a separate dedicated device. We evaluated the performance of the new instrument, the UF‐5000 (Sysmex Corporation), in the measurement of urine osmolality. METHODS: The precision of urine osmolality measurement by the UF‐5000 was evaluated for 20 days and 4 times a day for 2 concentrations. The linearity and detection capability were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. For comparison, 270 random urine specimens from patients were tested simultaneously using the UF5000 and the OsmoPro micro‐osmometer (Advanced instruments). RESULTS: The laboratory‐based coefficient variations were less than 5%. Urine osmolality using the UF‐5000 has a verified linear range (y = 1.097x + 16.91, R (2) = .997). Within the comparison analysis, the mean difference was not large (−7.72%) but each differences were largely dispersed with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from −70.5 to 55.06%, and the mean absolute difference −28.3 mOsm/kg with 95% LoA from −295.13 to 238.45 mOsm/kg. Cohen's kappa value was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45‐0.63). CONCLUSIONS: The UF‐5000 measured conductivity and generated an acceptable quantitative analysis of urine osmolality. When compared with the results of the freezing point depression method used by the OsmoPro, a percentage of the measured urine osmolality by the UF‐5000 was outside the allowable limit.