Cargando…
Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Descriptive survey. SETTING: All non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Acute (non-specialist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945 |
_version_ | 1783644119214587904 |
---|---|
author | Mateen, Bilal Akhter Wilde, Harrison Dennis, John M Duncan, Andrew Thomas, Nick McGovern, Andrew Denaxas, Spiros Keeling, Matt Vollmer, Sebastian |
author_facet | Mateen, Bilal Akhter Wilde, Harrison Dennis, John M Duncan, Andrew Thomas, Nick McGovern, Andrew Denaxas, Spiros Keeling, Matt Vollmer, Sebastian |
author_sort | Mateen, Bilal Akhter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Descriptive survey. SETTING: All non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Acute (non-specialist) trusts with a type 1 (ie, 24 hours/day, consultant-led) accident and emergency department (n=125), Nightingale (field) hospitals (n=7) and independent sector secondary care providers (n=195). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two thresholds for ‘safe occupancy’ were used: 85% as per the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and 92% as per NHS Improvement. RESULTS: At peak availability, there were 2711 additional beds compatible with mechanical ventilation across England, reflecting a 53% increase in capacity, and occupancy never exceeded 62%. A consequence of the repurposing of beds meant that at the trough there were 8.7% (8508) fewer general and acute beds across England, but occupancy never exceeded 72%. The closest to full occupancy of general and acute bed (surge) capacity that any trust in England reached was 99.8%. For beds compatible with mechanical ventilation there were 326 trust-days (3.7%) spent above 85% of surge capacity and 154 trust-days (1.8%) spent above 92%. 23 trusts spent a cumulative 81 days at 100% saturation of their surge ventilator bed capacity (median number of days per trust=1, range: 1–17). However, only three sustainability and transformation partnerships (aggregates of geographically co-located trusts) reached 100% saturation of their mechanical ventilation beds. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the first wave of the pandemic, an adequate supply of all bed types existed at a national level. However, due to an unequal distribution of bed utilisation, many trusts spent a significant period operating above ‘safe-occupancy’ thresholds despite substantial capacity in geographically co-located trusts, a key operational issue to address in preparing for future waves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7843315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78433152021-01-29 Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis Mateen, Bilal Akhter Wilde, Harrison Dennis, John M Duncan, Andrew Thomas, Nick McGovern, Andrew Denaxas, Spiros Keeling, Matt Vollmer, Sebastian BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Descriptive survey. SETTING: All non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Acute (non-specialist) trusts with a type 1 (ie, 24 hours/day, consultant-led) accident and emergency department (n=125), Nightingale (field) hospitals (n=7) and independent sector secondary care providers (n=195). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two thresholds for ‘safe occupancy’ were used: 85% as per the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and 92% as per NHS Improvement. RESULTS: At peak availability, there were 2711 additional beds compatible with mechanical ventilation across England, reflecting a 53% increase in capacity, and occupancy never exceeded 62%. A consequence of the repurposing of beds meant that at the trough there were 8.7% (8508) fewer general and acute beds across England, but occupancy never exceeded 72%. The closest to full occupancy of general and acute bed (surge) capacity that any trust in England reached was 99.8%. For beds compatible with mechanical ventilation there were 326 trust-days (3.7%) spent above 85% of surge capacity and 154 trust-days (1.8%) spent above 92%. 23 trusts spent a cumulative 81 days at 100% saturation of their surge ventilator bed capacity (median number of days per trust=1, range: 1–17). However, only three sustainability and transformation partnerships (aggregates of geographically co-located trusts) reached 100% saturation of their mechanical ventilation beds. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the first wave of the pandemic, an adequate supply of all bed types existed at a national level. However, due to an unequal distribution of bed utilisation, many trusts spent a significant period operating above ‘safe-occupancy’ thresholds despite substantial capacity in geographically co-located trusts, a key operational issue to address in preparing for future waves. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7843315/ /pubmed/33500288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Mateen, Bilal Akhter Wilde, Harrison Dennis, John M Duncan, Andrew Thomas, Nick McGovern, Andrew Denaxas, Spiros Keeling, Matt Vollmer, Sebastian Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title | Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title_full | Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title_fullStr | Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title_short | Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
title_sort | hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in england during the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mateenbilalakhter hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT wildeharrison hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT dennisjohnm hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT duncanandrew hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT thomasnick hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT mcgovernandrew hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT denaxasspiros hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT keelingmatt hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis AT vollmersebastian hospitalbedcapacityandusageacrosssecondaryhealthcareprovidersinenglandduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicadescriptiveanalysis |