Cargando…
Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older popula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492 |
_version_ | 1783644119718952960 |
---|---|
author | Derby, Sarah Forshaw, Matthew Lowrie, Caroline Grose, Derek Marashi, Husam McLoone, Philip Wilson, Christina McIntosh, David |
author_facet | Derby, Sarah Forshaw, Matthew Lowrie, Caroline Grose, Derek Marashi, Husam McLoone, Philip Wilson, Christina McIntosh, David |
author_sort | Derby, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus. METHODS: Patients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT. RESULTS: There were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment. CONCLUSION: Survival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7843319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78433192021-01-29 Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus Derby, Sarah Forshaw, Matthew Lowrie, Caroline Grose, Derek Marashi, Husam McLoone, Philip Wilson, Christina McIntosh, David BMJ Open Gastroenterol Cancer BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus. METHODS: Patients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT. RESULTS: There were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment. CONCLUSION: Survival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7843319/ /pubmed/33504498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cancer Derby, Sarah Forshaw, Matthew Lowrie, Caroline Grose, Derek Marashi, Husam McLoone, Philip Wilson, Christina McIntosh, David Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title | Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title_full | Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title_fullStr | Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title_full_unstemmed | Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title_short | Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
title_sort | single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus |
topic | Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derbysarah singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT forshawmatthew singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT lowriecaroline singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT grosederek singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT marashihusam singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT mcloonephilip singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT wilsonchristina singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus AT mcintoshdavid singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus |