Cargando…

Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derby, Sarah, Forshaw, Matthew, Lowrie, Caroline, Grose, Derek, Marashi, Husam, McLoone, Philip, Wilson, Christina, McIntosh, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492
_version_ 1783644119718952960
author Derby, Sarah
Forshaw, Matthew
Lowrie, Caroline
Grose, Derek
Marashi, Husam
McLoone, Philip
Wilson, Christina
McIntosh, David
author_facet Derby, Sarah
Forshaw, Matthew
Lowrie, Caroline
Grose, Derek
Marashi, Husam
McLoone, Philip
Wilson, Christina
McIntosh, David
author_sort Derby, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus. METHODS: Patients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT. RESULTS: There were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment. CONCLUSION: Survival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78433192021-01-29 Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus Derby, Sarah Forshaw, Matthew Lowrie, Caroline Grose, Derek Marashi, Husam McLoone, Philip Wilson, Christina McIntosh, David BMJ Open Gastroenterol Cancer BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus. METHODS: Patients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT. RESULTS: There were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment. CONCLUSION: Survival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7843319/ /pubmed/33504498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cancer
Derby, Sarah
Forshaw, Matthew
Lowrie, Caroline
Grose, Derek
Marashi, Husam
McLoone, Philip
Wilson, Christina
McIntosh, David
Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title_full Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title_fullStr Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title_full_unstemmed Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title_short Single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
title_sort single modality radical radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative for the older patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
topic Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000492
work_keys_str_mv AT derbysarah singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT forshawmatthew singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT lowriecaroline singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT grosederek singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT marashihusam singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT mcloonephilip singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT wilsonchristina singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus
AT mcintoshdavid singlemodalityradicalradiotherapyisanacceptablealternativefortheolderpatientwithsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheoesophagus