Cargando…
Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial
PURPOSE: The AT LARA 829MP is a next-generation extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) providing continuous vision over a range of distances. The aim of this prospective multi-centre randomised trial was to compare two EDOF IOLs and one monofocal IOL. METHODS: Cataract patients betwee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5 |
_version_ | 1783644172151947264 |
---|---|
author | Reinhard, Thomas Maier, Philip Böhringer, Daniel Bertelmann, Eckart Brockmann, Tobias Kiraly, Laszlo Salom, David Piovella, Matteo Colonval, Stephane Mendicute, Javier |
author_facet | Reinhard, Thomas Maier, Philip Böhringer, Daniel Bertelmann, Eckart Brockmann, Tobias Kiraly, Laszlo Salom, David Piovella, Matteo Colonval, Stephane Mendicute, Javier |
author_sort | Reinhard, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The AT LARA 829MP is a next-generation extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) providing continuous vision over a range of distances. The aim of this prospective multi-centre randomised trial was to compare two EDOF IOLs and one monofocal IOL. METHODS: Cataract patients between 50 and 80 years were randomised for bilateral implantation with either the AT LARA 829MP (EDOF), the TECNIS Symfony (EDOF) or the CT ASPHINA 409MP (monofocal). Follow-up was at 1 to 2 weeks, 1 month and 4 to 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were randomised and included in the final analysis. Monocular depth of focus was significantly better for AT LARA 829MP eyes compared with that for TECNIS Symfony at all thresholds (p = 0.024, 0.001 and 0.006, for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR respectively) with no significant difference for binocular depth of focus. LARA eyes had significantly better monocular depth of focus at all levels compared with ASPHINA eyes (all p < 0.0001), while there was no significant difference between Symfony and ASPHINA eyes at 0.1 logMAR and 0.2 logMAR. Both EDOF IOLs were significantly better than the monofocal ASPHINA at all levels for binocular depth of focus (LARA: all p < 0.0001; Symfony: all p = 0.002). Distance visual acuity was similar for all IOLs at 6 months; intermediate and near visual acuity were significantly better for the EDOF IOLs than for the monofocal (p < 0.0001). Refraction improved in all groups relative to baseline. Contrast sensitivity was higher with the CT ASPHINA 409MP but both EDOF lenses had a better spectacle independence rate. At 6 months, all IOLs were well centred with no cases of tilt. No general safety issues were raised for any of the groups. CONCLUSION: The two EDOF intraocular lenses investigated provided good visual outcomes with comparable visual acuity at all distances. The AT LARA 829MP provided the widest monocular depth of focus at 0.1 and 0.2 logMAR, with a clear superiority compared with the monofocal IOL. TECNIS Symfony was superior to the monofocal control at 0.3 logMAR. Spectacle independence and patient satisfaction were comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03172351 (date of registration 1 June May 2017). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7843553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78435532021-02-04 Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial Reinhard, Thomas Maier, Philip Böhringer, Daniel Bertelmann, Eckart Brockmann, Tobias Kiraly, Laszlo Salom, David Piovella, Matteo Colonval, Stephane Mendicute, Javier Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Cataract PURPOSE: The AT LARA 829MP is a next-generation extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) providing continuous vision over a range of distances. The aim of this prospective multi-centre randomised trial was to compare two EDOF IOLs and one monofocal IOL. METHODS: Cataract patients between 50 and 80 years were randomised for bilateral implantation with either the AT LARA 829MP (EDOF), the TECNIS Symfony (EDOF) or the CT ASPHINA 409MP (monofocal). Follow-up was at 1 to 2 weeks, 1 month and 4 to 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were randomised and included in the final analysis. Monocular depth of focus was significantly better for AT LARA 829MP eyes compared with that for TECNIS Symfony at all thresholds (p = 0.024, 0.001 and 0.006, for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR respectively) with no significant difference for binocular depth of focus. LARA eyes had significantly better monocular depth of focus at all levels compared with ASPHINA eyes (all p < 0.0001), while there was no significant difference between Symfony and ASPHINA eyes at 0.1 logMAR and 0.2 logMAR. Both EDOF IOLs were significantly better than the monofocal ASPHINA at all levels for binocular depth of focus (LARA: all p < 0.0001; Symfony: all p = 0.002). Distance visual acuity was similar for all IOLs at 6 months; intermediate and near visual acuity were significantly better for the EDOF IOLs than for the monofocal (p < 0.0001). Refraction improved in all groups relative to baseline. Contrast sensitivity was higher with the CT ASPHINA 409MP but both EDOF lenses had a better spectacle independence rate. At 6 months, all IOLs were well centred with no cases of tilt. No general safety issues were raised for any of the groups. CONCLUSION: The two EDOF intraocular lenses investigated provided good visual outcomes with comparable visual acuity at all distances. The AT LARA 829MP provided the widest monocular depth of focus at 0.1 and 0.2 logMAR, with a clear superiority compared with the monofocal IOL. TECNIS Symfony was superior to the monofocal control at 0.3 logMAR. Spectacle independence and patient satisfaction were comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03172351 (date of registration 1 June May 2017). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7843553/ /pubmed/32915276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cataract Reinhard, Thomas Maier, Philip Böhringer, Daniel Bertelmann, Eckart Brockmann, Tobias Kiraly, Laszlo Salom, David Piovella, Matteo Colonval, Stephane Mendicute, Javier Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title | Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title_full | Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title_short | Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
title_sort | comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial |
topic | Cataract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reinhardthomas comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT maierphilip comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT bohringerdaniel comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT bertelmanneckart comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT brockmanntobias comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT kiralylaszlo comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT salomdavid comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT piovellamatteo comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT colonvalstephane comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial AT mendicutejavier comparisonoftwoextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlenseswithamonofocallensamulticentrerandomisedtrial |