Cargando…

Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern

Sex- and flow-related aortic valve calcification (AVC) studies are still limited in number, and data on the exact calcium quantity and distribution are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to (1) re-define the best threshold of AVC load to distinguish severe from moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in common AS en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veulemans, Verena, Piayda, Kerstin, Maier, Oliver, Bosbach, Georg, Polzin, Amin, Hellhammer, Katharina, Afzal, Shazia, Klein, Kathrin, Dannenberg, Lisa, Zako, Saif, Jung, Christian, Westenfeld, Ralf, Kelm, Malte, Zeus, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01688-9
_version_ 1783644173457424384
author Veulemans, Verena
Piayda, Kerstin
Maier, Oliver
Bosbach, Georg
Polzin, Amin
Hellhammer, Katharina
Afzal, Shazia
Klein, Kathrin
Dannenberg, Lisa
Zako, Saif
Jung, Christian
Westenfeld, Ralf
Kelm, Malte
Zeus, Tobias
author_facet Veulemans, Verena
Piayda, Kerstin
Maier, Oliver
Bosbach, Georg
Polzin, Amin
Hellhammer, Katharina
Afzal, Shazia
Klein, Kathrin
Dannenberg, Lisa
Zako, Saif
Jung, Christian
Westenfeld, Ralf
Kelm, Malte
Zeus, Tobias
author_sort Veulemans, Verena
collection PubMed
description Sex- and flow-related aortic valve calcification (AVC) studies are still limited in number, and data on the exact calcium quantity and distribution are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to (1) re-define the best threshold of AVC load to distinguish severe from moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in common AS entities and to (2) evaluate differences in the aortic annulus and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcium load. Nine hundred and thirty-eight patients with contrast-enhanced cardiac MSCT and moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with severe AS ≤ 1.0 cm(2) (n = 841) were further separated into three AS entities: high gradient (HGAS, n = 370, 44.0%), paradoxical low gradient (pLGAS, n = 333, 39.6%), and classical low gradient (LGAS, n = 138, 16.4%). AVC, leaflet, and LVOT calcification were quantified. Aortic valve calcification scores were highest in severe HGAS, and lower in severe pLGAS and classical LGAS. In all severity and AS entities, the non-coronary cusp (NCC) was the most calcified one. LVOT calcification was consistently comparable between gender and AS entities. Accuracy of logistic regression was the highest in HGAS (male vs. female: AVC > 2156 Agatston units (AU), c-index 0.76; vs. AVC > 1292 AU, c-index 0.85; or AVC density > 406 AU/cm(2), c-index 0.82; vs. > 259 AU/cm(2), c-index 0.86; each p < 0.0001*) to diagnose severe AS. AVC could only be used in men to differentiate between severe LGAS and moderate AS. Data from this retrospective analysis indicate that the NCC is subject to pre-dominant degeneration throughout gender, AS severity, and several AS entities. AVC was consistently comparable in severe pLGAS and classical LGAS, but only AVC in severe LGAS could sufficiently distinguish from moderate AS in men. LVOT calcification failed to be a reliable indicator of accelerating AS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00380-020-01688-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78435592021-02-04 Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern Veulemans, Verena Piayda, Kerstin Maier, Oliver Bosbach, Georg Polzin, Amin Hellhammer, Katharina Afzal, Shazia Klein, Kathrin Dannenberg, Lisa Zako, Saif Jung, Christian Westenfeld, Ralf Kelm, Malte Zeus, Tobias Heart Vessels Original Article Sex- and flow-related aortic valve calcification (AVC) studies are still limited in number, and data on the exact calcium quantity and distribution are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to (1) re-define the best threshold of AVC load to distinguish severe from moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in common AS entities and to (2) evaluate differences in the aortic annulus and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcium load. Nine hundred and thirty-eight patients with contrast-enhanced cardiac MSCT and moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with severe AS ≤ 1.0 cm(2) (n = 841) were further separated into three AS entities: high gradient (HGAS, n = 370, 44.0%), paradoxical low gradient (pLGAS, n = 333, 39.6%), and classical low gradient (LGAS, n = 138, 16.4%). AVC, leaflet, and LVOT calcification were quantified. Aortic valve calcification scores were highest in severe HGAS, and lower in severe pLGAS and classical LGAS. In all severity and AS entities, the non-coronary cusp (NCC) was the most calcified one. LVOT calcification was consistently comparable between gender and AS entities. Accuracy of logistic regression was the highest in HGAS (male vs. female: AVC > 2156 Agatston units (AU), c-index 0.76; vs. AVC > 1292 AU, c-index 0.85; or AVC density > 406 AU/cm(2), c-index 0.82; vs. > 259 AU/cm(2), c-index 0.86; each p < 0.0001*) to diagnose severe AS. AVC could only be used in men to differentiate between severe LGAS and moderate AS. Data from this retrospective analysis indicate that the NCC is subject to pre-dominant degeneration throughout gender, AS severity, and several AS entities. AVC was consistently comparable in severe pLGAS and classical LGAS, but only AVC in severe LGAS could sufficiently distinguish from moderate AS in men. LVOT calcification failed to be a reliable indicator of accelerating AS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00380-020-01688-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Japan 2020-09-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7843559/ /pubmed/32894344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01688-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Veulemans, Verena
Piayda, Kerstin
Maier, Oliver
Bosbach, Georg
Polzin, Amin
Hellhammer, Katharina
Afzal, Shazia
Klein, Kathrin
Dannenberg, Lisa
Zako, Saif
Jung, Christian
Westenfeld, Ralf
Kelm, Malte
Zeus, Tobias
Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title_full Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title_fullStr Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title_full_unstemmed Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title_short Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
title_sort aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01688-9
work_keys_str_mv AT veulemansverena aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT piaydakerstin aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT maieroliver aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT bosbachgeorg aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT polzinamin aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT hellhammerkatharina aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT afzalshazia aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT kleinkathrin aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT dannenberglisa aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT zakosaif aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT jungchristian aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT westenfeldralf aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT kelmmalte aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern
AT zeustobias aorticvalvecalcificationissubjecttoaorticstenosisseverityandtheunderlyingflowpattern