Cargando…

A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION: Clarke, Gold and Pedersen are validated methods to assess awareness of hypoglycaemia. Identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is critical for supporting people with structured education and diabetes technologies, to reduce harm of hypoglycaemia. This study compares the Cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghandi, Kshitiz, Pieri, Beatrice, Dornhorst, Anne, Hussain, Sufyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00965-0
_version_ 1783644198080086016
author Ghandi, Kshitiz
Pieri, Beatrice
Dornhorst, Anne
Hussain, Sufyan
author_facet Ghandi, Kshitiz
Pieri, Beatrice
Dornhorst, Anne
Hussain, Sufyan
author_sort Ghandi, Kshitiz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clarke, Gold and Pedersen are validated methods to assess awareness of hypoglycaemia. Identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is critical for supporting people with structured education and diabetes technologies, to reduce harm of hypoglycaemia. This study compares the Clarke score, Gold score and Pedersen methods and their correlations with features of hypoglycaemia unawareness and patient characteristics, to evaluate the accuracy of the methods in identifying IAH. METHODS: This retrospective, observational questionnaire-based study collected routine clinical data from 100 people with type 1 diabetes. The questionnaire included the three validated scoring methods, frequency of severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, knowledge and worry of hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia symptom scores using the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale. Data were analysed for IAH prevalence and the associations with features of IAH. The concordance of Clarke, Gold and Pedersen methods was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The prevalence of IAH in this cohort identified by Clarke, Gold and Pedersen methods was 18%, 19% and 61% respectively. The mean autonomic symptom score in people with IAH was significantly reduced using the Clarke method (P = 0.0002) but not on Gold (P = 0.12) and Pedersen methods (P = 0.79). For people with IAH assessed using the Clarke method, scores for night-time worry regarding hypoglycaemia (P = 0.04) and self-reported frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (P = 0.001) were increased. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between Pedersen and Clarke and Pedersen and Gold were R(s) = 0.555 (P < 0.001) and R(s) = 0.645 (P < 0.001) respectively. A moderate association was observed between Clarke and Gold R(s) = 0.5669 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whilst Clarke and Gold methods determined a similar prevalence of IAH, people identified with IAH assessed by the Clarke method had a significant association with the features and characteristics of IAH, including reduced autonomic symptoms. This study suggests that performing more than one score is important for a reliable risk assessment of IAH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-020-00965-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78436752021-01-29 A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study Ghandi, Kshitiz Pieri, Beatrice Dornhorst, Anne Hussain, Sufyan Diabetes Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Clarke, Gold and Pedersen are validated methods to assess awareness of hypoglycaemia. Identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is critical for supporting people with structured education and diabetes technologies, to reduce harm of hypoglycaemia. This study compares the Clarke score, Gold score and Pedersen methods and their correlations with features of hypoglycaemia unawareness and patient characteristics, to evaluate the accuracy of the methods in identifying IAH. METHODS: This retrospective, observational questionnaire-based study collected routine clinical data from 100 people with type 1 diabetes. The questionnaire included the three validated scoring methods, frequency of severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, knowledge and worry of hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia symptom scores using the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale. Data were analysed for IAH prevalence and the associations with features of IAH. The concordance of Clarke, Gold and Pedersen methods was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The prevalence of IAH in this cohort identified by Clarke, Gold and Pedersen methods was 18%, 19% and 61% respectively. The mean autonomic symptom score in people with IAH was significantly reduced using the Clarke method (P = 0.0002) but not on Gold (P = 0.12) and Pedersen methods (P = 0.79). For people with IAH assessed using the Clarke method, scores for night-time worry regarding hypoglycaemia (P = 0.04) and self-reported frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (P = 0.001) were increased. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between Pedersen and Clarke and Pedersen and Gold were R(s) = 0.555 (P < 0.001) and R(s) = 0.645 (P < 0.001) respectively. A moderate association was observed between Clarke and Gold R(s) = 0.5669 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whilst Clarke and Gold methods determined a similar prevalence of IAH, people identified with IAH assessed by the Clarke method had a significant association with the features and characteristics of IAH, including reduced autonomic symptoms. This study suggests that performing more than one score is important for a reliable risk assessment of IAH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-020-00965-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-20 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7843675/ /pubmed/33219468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00965-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Ghandi, Kshitiz
Pieri, Beatrice
Dornhorst, Anne
Hussain, Sufyan
A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_full A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_short A Comparison of Validated Methods Used to Assess Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_sort comparison of validated methods used to assess impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: an observational study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00965-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ghandikshitiz acomparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT pieribeatrice acomparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT dornhorstanne acomparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT hussainsufyan acomparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT ghandikshitiz comparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT pieribeatrice comparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT dornhorstanne comparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT hussainsufyan comparisonofvalidatedmethodsusedtoassessimpairedawarenessofhypoglycaemiaintype1diabetesanobservationalstudy