Cargando…

Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence has demonstrated improved glycemic control and insulin management following introduction of smart insulin pens in a Swedish type 1 diabetes (T1D) population. To understand the implications for healthcare costs and expected health outcomes, this analysis evaluated th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jendle, Johan, Ericsson, Åsa, Gundgaard, Jens, Møller, Jonas Bech, Valentine, William J., Hunt, Barnaby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1
_version_ 1783644198359007232
author Jendle, Johan
Ericsson, Åsa
Gundgaard, Jens
Møller, Jonas Bech
Valentine, William J.
Hunt, Barnaby
author_facet Jendle, Johan
Ericsson, Åsa
Gundgaard, Jens
Møller, Jonas Bech
Valentine, William J.
Hunt, Barnaby
author_sort Jendle, Johan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence has demonstrated improved glycemic control and insulin management following introduction of smart insulin pens in a Swedish type 1 diabetes (T1D) population. To understand the implications for healthcare costs and expected health outcomes, this analysis evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of introducing smart insulin pens to standard-of-care T1D treatment (standard care) from a Swedish societal perspective. METHODS: Clinical outcomes and healthcare costs (in 2018 Swedish krona, SEK) were projected over patients’ lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model to estimate cost-effectiveness. Clinical data and baseline characteristics for the simulated cohort were informed by population data and a prospective, noninterventional study of a smart insulin pen in a Swedish T1D population. This analysis captured direct and indirect costs, mortality, and the impact of diabetes-related complications on quality of life. RESULTS: Over patients’ lifetimes, smart insulin pen use was associated with per-patient improvements in mean discounted life expectancy (+ 0.90 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (+ 1.15 quality-adjusted life-years), in addition to mean cost savings (direct, SEK 124,270; indirect, SEK 373,725), versus standard care. A lower frequency and delayed onset of complications drove projected improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy and lower costs with smart insulin pens versus standard care. Overall, smart insulin pens were a dominant treatment option relative to standard care across all base-case and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of smart insulin pens was projected to improve clinical outcomes at lower costs relative to standard care in a Swedish T1D population and represents a good use of healthcare resources in Sweden. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78436772021-01-29 Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Jendle, Johan Ericsson, Åsa Gundgaard, Jens Møller, Jonas Bech Valentine, William J. Hunt, Barnaby Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence has demonstrated improved glycemic control and insulin management following introduction of smart insulin pens in a Swedish type 1 diabetes (T1D) population. To understand the implications for healthcare costs and expected health outcomes, this analysis evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of introducing smart insulin pens to standard-of-care T1D treatment (standard care) from a Swedish societal perspective. METHODS: Clinical outcomes and healthcare costs (in 2018 Swedish krona, SEK) were projected over patients’ lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model to estimate cost-effectiveness. Clinical data and baseline characteristics for the simulated cohort were informed by population data and a prospective, noninterventional study of a smart insulin pen in a Swedish T1D population. This analysis captured direct and indirect costs, mortality, and the impact of diabetes-related complications on quality of life. RESULTS: Over patients’ lifetimes, smart insulin pen use was associated with per-patient improvements in mean discounted life expectancy (+ 0.90 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (+ 1.15 quality-adjusted life-years), in addition to mean cost savings (direct, SEK 124,270; indirect, SEK 373,725), versus standard care. A lower frequency and delayed onset of complications drove projected improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy and lower costs with smart insulin pens versus standard care. Overall, smart insulin pens were a dominant treatment option relative to standard care across all base-case and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of smart insulin pens was projected to improve clinical outcomes at lower costs relative to standard care in a Swedish T1D population and represents a good use of healthcare resources in Sweden. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1. Springer Healthcare 2020-12-11 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7843677/ /pubmed/33306169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jendle, Johan
Ericsson, Åsa
Gundgaard, Jens
Møller, Jonas Bech
Valentine, William J.
Hunt, Barnaby
Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Smart Insulin Pens are Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort smart insulin pens are associated with improved clinical outcomes at lower cost versus standard-of-care treatment of type 1 diabetes in sweden: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jendlejohan smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT ericssonasa smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT gundgaardjens smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT møllerjonasbech smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT valentinewilliamj smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT huntbarnaby smartinsulinpensareassociatedwithimprovedclinicaloutcomesatlowercostversusstandardofcaretreatmentoftype1diabetesinswedenacosteffectivenessanalysis