Cargando…
The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8 |
_version_ | 1783644202605740032 |
---|---|
author | Hidalgo, Jazmin Baghernejad, Desirée Falk, Anders Larsson, Christel |
author_facet | Hidalgo, Jazmin Baghernejad, Desirée Falk, Anders Larsson, Christel |
author_sort | Hidalgo, Jazmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement (n = 10) and zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). After removal of cement excess, remaining cement excess were measured with pixel area calculation method and by weighing. Differences in amount of remaining cement excess were analyzed using Independent Samples t-Test. Level of significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a significantly greater amount of remaining cement excess than calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement in terms of total number of pixels (p = 0.002) and amount in grams (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the amount of remaining cement excess can be affected by the type of cement. Calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement may be a more suitable choice for cement-retained dental implant restorations, and possibly reduce the risk of complications related to cement excess such as peri-implant disease. Further studies are needed to verify the results from the present study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7843716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78437162021-02-11 The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study Hidalgo, Jazmin Baghernejad, Desirée Falk, Anders Larsson, Christel BDJ Open Article AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement (n = 10) and zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). After removal of cement excess, remaining cement excess were measured with pixel area calculation method and by weighing. Differences in amount of remaining cement excess were analyzed using Independent Samples t-Test. Level of significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a significantly greater amount of remaining cement excess than calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement in terms of total number of pixels (p = 0.002) and amount in grams (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the amount of remaining cement excess can be affected by the type of cement. Calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement may be a more suitable choice for cement-retained dental implant restorations, and possibly reduce the risk of complications related to cement excess such as peri-implant disease. Further studies are needed to verify the results from the present study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7843716/ /pubmed/33510129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hidalgo, Jazmin Baghernejad, Desirée Falk, Anders Larsson, Christel The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title | The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title_full | The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title_short | The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study |
title_sort | influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidalgojazmin theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT baghernejaddesiree theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT falkanders theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT larssonchristel theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT hidalgojazmin influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT baghernejaddesiree influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT falkanders influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy AT larssonchristel influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy |