Cargando…

The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study

AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hidalgo, Jazmin, Baghernejad, Desirée, Falk, Anders, Larsson, Christel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8
_version_ 1783644202605740032
author Hidalgo, Jazmin
Baghernejad, Desirée
Falk, Anders
Larsson, Christel
author_facet Hidalgo, Jazmin
Baghernejad, Desirée
Falk, Anders
Larsson, Christel
author_sort Hidalgo, Jazmin
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement (n = 10) and zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). After removal of cement excess, remaining cement excess were measured with pixel area calculation method and by weighing. Differences in amount of remaining cement excess were analyzed using Independent Samples t-Test. Level of significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a significantly greater amount of remaining cement excess than calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement in terms of total number of pixels (p = 0.002) and amount in grams (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the amount of remaining cement excess can be affected by the type of cement. Calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement may be a more suitable choice for cement-retained dental implant restorations, and possibly reduce the risk of complications related to cement excess such as peri-implant disease. Further studies are needed to verify the results from the present study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78437162021-02-11 The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study Hidalgo, Jazmin Baghernejad, Desirée Falk, Anders Larsson, Christel BDJ Open Article AIM: To compare the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns with zinc phosphate or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented on dental implant abutments using a calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement (n = 10) and zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). After removal of cement excess, remaining cement excess were measured with pixel area calculation method and by weighing. Differences in amount of remaining cement excess were analyzed using Independent Samples t-Test. Level of significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a significantly greater amount of remaining cement excess than calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement in terms of total number of pixels (p = 0.002) and amount in grams (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the amount of remaining cement excess can be affected by the type of cement. Calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement may be a more suitable choice for cement-retained dental implant restorations, and possibly reduce the risk of complications related to cement excess such as peri-implant disease. Further studies are needed to verify the results from the present study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7843716/ /pubmed/33510129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hidalgo, Jazmin
Baghernejad, Desirée
Falk, Anders
Larsson, Christel
The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title_full The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title_fullStr The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title_short The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
title_sort influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hidalgojazmin theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT baghernejaddesiree theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT falkanders theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT larssonchristel theinfluenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT hidalgojazmin influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT baghernejaddesiree influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT falkanders influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy
AT larssonchristel influenceoftwodifferentcementsonremainingcementexcessincementretainedimplantsupportedzirconiacrownsaninvitrostudy