Cargando…

Assessing Patient Satisfaction Following Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION: In Japan, several sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been used for type 1 diabetes mellitus as an adjuvant therapy to insulin therapy; however, there are no clinical reports regarding the satisfaction of its use. Therefore, we conducted a survey among patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishibashi, Ryoichi, Baba, Yusuke, Kakinuma, Kyoka, Takasaki, Atsushi, Hiraga, Chihiro, Harama, Tomomi, Yamamoto, Tetsuya, Nakamura, Susumu, Koshizaka, Masaya, Maezawa, Yoshiro, Uchida, Daigaku, Okajima, Fumitaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33237553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00971-2
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In Japan, several sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been used for type 1 diabetes mellitus as an adjuvant therapy to insulin therapy; however, there are no clinical reports regarding the satisfaction of its use. Therefore, we conducted a survey among patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing treatment using an SGLT2 inhibitor. METHODS: This is a single-arm open-label prospective study including 24 patients with type 1 diabetes who were to be initiated on ipragliflozin treatment between March and August 2019. All participants provided written informed consent. They completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for the survey and 3 months of observation after the administration of an SGLT2 inhibitor (50 mg of ipragliflozin), and changes from baseline diabetes treatment satisfaction were evaluated using modified DTSQ scores (five-step evaluation) and were analyzed. RESULTS: The average score for each question on DTSQ significantly increased [mean (standard deviation); 0.25 (0.25) vs 0.83 (0.77), P = 0.004]. Approximately 75% of the patients perceived an improvement in glycemic control over short periods of time. Finally, 54.2% of patients were highly satisfied and would recommend the SGLT2 inhibitor treatment [0.0 (0.0) vs. 0.92 (1.32), P < 0.001]. After the administration of ipragliflozin, reductions in body weight [24.0 (2.9) vs. 23.4 (2.9) kg/m(2), P = 0.002], total insulin [39.1 (12.9) vs. 34.3 (12.5) units, P = 0.013], and glycated hemoglobin [7.77 (0.97) vs. 7.40 (0.86) %, P = 0.013] were observed, without any severe side effects. Improvements in glycemic variability indexes were observed through flash glucose monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors may improve clinical treatment satisfaction by improving glycemic variability in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, while not inducing severe side effects with careful use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000040487).