Cargando…

A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains

Introduction: Several new treatments have been developed for psoriatic disease, an inflammatory condition that involves skin and joints. Notwithstanding, few studies have made direct comparisons between treatments and therefore it is difficult to select the ideal treatment for an individual patient....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Tiago, Barcelos, Anabela, Filipe, Paulo, Fonseca, João Eurico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.618163
_version_ 1783644230481084416
author Torres, Tiago
Barcelos, Anabela
Filipe, Paulo
Fonseca, João Eurico
author_facet Torres, Tiago
Barcelos, Anabela
Filipe, Paulo
Fonseca, João Eurico
author_sort Torres, Tiago
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Several new treatments have been developed for psoriatic disease, an inflammatory condition that involves skin and joints. Notwithstanding, few studies have made direct comparisons between treatments and therefore it is difficult to select the ideal treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) was to analyze available and approved biologic therapies for each domain of psoriatic disease: skin, peripheral arthritis, axial arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail involvement. Methods: Data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE database (July 2020) using PICO criteria. Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of biological therapy in terms of the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR, 24 weeks) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI, 10–16 weeks). Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included in the systematic review. Due to the design of the RCTs, namely, outcomes and time points, network meta-analysis was performed for skin and peripheral arthritis domains. For the skin domain, 30 studies reporting PASI100 were included. The peripheral arthritis domain was analyzed through ACR70 in 12 studies. From the therapies approved for both domains, secukinumab and ixekizumab were the ones with the highest probability of reaching the proposed outcomes. There is a lack of outcome uniformization in the dactylitis, enthesitis, and nail domains, and therefore, an objective comparison of the studies was not feasible. Nevertheless, secukinumab was the treatment with the best compromise between the number of studies in each domain and the results obtained in the different outcomes. Conclusion: Secukinumab and ixekizumab were the treatments with the highest probability of reaching both PASI100 and ACR70 outcomes. Due to the lack of a standard evaluation of outcomes of the other psoriatic disease domains, a network meta-analysis for all the domains was not possible to perform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78439382021-01-30 A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains Torres, Tiago Barcelos, Anabela Filipe, Paulo Fonseca, João Eurico Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Introduction: Several new treatments have been developed for psoriatic disease, an inflammatory condition that involves skin and joints. Notwithstanding, few studies have made direct comparisons between treatments and therefore it is difficult to select the ideal treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) was to analyze available and approved biologic therapies for each domain of psoriatic disease: skin, peripheral arthritis, axial arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail involvement. Methods: Data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE database (July 2020) using PICO criteria. Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of biological therapy in terms of the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR, 24 weeks) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI, 10–16 weeks). Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included in the systematic review. Due to the design of the RCTs, namely, outcomes and time points, network meta-analysis was performed for skin and peripheral arthritis domains. For the skin domain, 30 studies reporting PASI100 were included. The peripheral arthritis domain was analyzed through ACR70 in 12 studies. From the therapies approved for both domains, secukinumab and ixekizumab were the ones with the highest probability of reaching the proposed outcomes. There is a lack of outcome uniformization in the dactylitis, enthesitis, and nail domains, and therefore, an objective comparison of the studies was not feasible. Nevertheless, secukinumab was the treatment with the best compromise between the number of studies in each domain and the results obtained in the different outcomes. Conclusion: Secukinumab and ixekizumab were the treatments with the highest probability of reaching both PASI100 and ACR70 outcomes. Due to the lack of a standard evaluation of outcomes of the other psoriatic disease domains, a network meta-analysis for all the domains was not possible to perform. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7843938/ /pubmed/33521024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.618163 Text en Copyright © 2021 Torres, Barcelos, Filipe and Fonseca. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Torres, Tiago
Barcelos, Anabela
Filipe, Paulo
Fonseca, João Eurico
A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title_full A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title_fullStr A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title_short A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains
title_sort systematic review with network meta-analysis of the available biologic therapies for psoriatic disease domains
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.618163
work_keys_str_mv AT torrestiago asystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT barcelosanabela asystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT filipepaulo asystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT fonsecajoaoeurico asystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT torrestiago systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT barcelosanabela systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT filipepaulo systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains
AT fonsecajoaoeurico systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisoftheavailablebiologictherapiesforpsoriaticdiseasedomains