Cargando…

Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?

This study applied causal criteria in directed acyclic graphs for handling covariates in associations for prognosis of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. To identify non-specific blood tests and risk factors as predictors of hospitalisation due to COVID-19, one has to exclude noisy pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, G., Argenti, G., Fadel, C. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000078
_version_ 1783644290901082112
author Ishikawa, G.
Argenti, G.
Fadel, C. B.
author_facet Ishikawa, G.
Argenti, G.
Fadel, C. B.
author_sort Ishikawa, G.
collection PubMed
description This study applied causal criteria in directed acyclic graphs for handling covariates in associations for prognosis of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. To identify non-specific blood tests and risk factors as predictors of hospitalisation due to COVID-19, one has to exclude noisy predictors by comparing the concordance statistics (area under the curve − AUC) for positive and negative cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Predictors with significant AUC at negative stratum should be either controlled for their confounders or eliminated (when confounders are unavailable). Models were classified according to the difference of AUC between strata. The framework was applied to an open database with 5644 patients from Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in Brazil with SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) exam. C-reactive protein (CRP) was a noisy predictor: hospitalisation could have happened due to causes other than COVID-19 even when SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR is positive and CRP is reactive, as most cases are asymptomatic to mild. Candidates of characteristic response from moderate-to-severe inflammation of COVID-19 were: combinations of eosinophils, monocytes and neutrophils, with age as risk factor; and creatinine, as risk factor, sharpens the odds ratio of the model with monocytes, neutrophils and age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7844186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78441862021-02-01 Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors? Ishikawa, G. Argenti, G. Fadel, C. B. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper This study applied causal criteria in directed acyclic graphs for handling covariates in associations for prognosis of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. To identify non-specific blood tests and risk factors as predictors of hospitalisation due to COVID-19, one has to exclude noisy predictors by comparing the concordance statistics (area under the curve − AUC) for positive and negative cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Predictors with significant AUC at negative stratum should be either controlled for their confounders or eliminated (when confounders are unavailable). Models were classified according to the difference of AUC between strata. The framework was applied to an open database with 5644 patients from Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in Brazil with SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) exam. C-reactive protein (CRP) was a noisy predictor: hospitalisation could have happened due to causes other than COVID-19 even when SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR is positive and CRP is reactive, as most cases are asymptomatic to mild. Candidates of characteristic response from moderate-to-severe inflammation of COVID-19 were: combinations of eosinophils, monocytes and neutrophils, with age as risk factor; and creatinine, as risk factor, sharpens the odds ratio of the model with monocytes, neutrophils and age. Cambridge University Press 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7844186/ /pubmed/33427157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000078 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ishikawa, G.
Argenti, G.
Fadel, C. B.
Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title_full Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title_fullStr Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title_full_unstemmed Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title_short Non-specific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
title_sort non-specific blood tests as proxies for covid-19 hospitalisation: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000078
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawag nonspecificbloodtestsasproxiesforcovid19hospitalisationarethereplausibleassociationsafterexcludingnoisypredictors
AT argentig nonspecificbloodtestsasproxiesforcovid19hospitalisationarethereplausibleassociationsafterexcludingnoisypredictors
AT fadelcb nonspecificbloodtestsasproxiesforcovid19hospitalisationarethereplausibleassociationsafterexcludingnoisypredictors