Cargando…

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support

IMPORTANCE: Initial guidelines recommended prompt endotracheal intubation rather than non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for COVID-19 patients requiring ventilator support. There is insufficient data comparing the impact of intubation versus NIV on patient-centered outcomes of these patients. OBJECTIVE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, Pia, Mecklenburg, Max, Massiah, Chanée, Joseph, Michael A., Wilson, Clara, Parmar, Priyanka, Rosengarten, Sabrina, Maini, Rohan, Kim, Julie, Oomen, Alvin, Zehtabchi, Shahriar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.068
_version_ 1783644334952808448
author Daniel, Pia
Mecklenburg, Max
Massiah, Chanée
Joseph, Michael A.
Wilson, Clara
Parmar, Priyanka
Rosengarten, Sabrina
Maini, Rohan
Kim, Julie
Oomen, Alvin
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
author_facet Daniel, Pia
Mecklenburg, Max
Massiah, Chanée
Joseph, Michael A.
Wilson, Clara
Parmar, Priyanka
Rosengarten, Sabrina
Maini, Rohan
Kim, Julie
Oomen, Alvin
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
author_sort Daniel, Pia
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Initial guidelines recommended prompt endotracheal intubation rather than non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for COVID-19 patients requiring ventilator support. There is insufficient data comparing the impact of intubation versus NIV on patient-centered outcomes of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare all-cause 30-day mortality for hospitalized COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure who underwent intubation first, intubation after NIV, or NIV only. DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients admitted in March and April of 2020. SETTING: A teaching hospital in Brooklyn, New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Adult COVID-19 confirmed patients who required ventilator support (non-invasive ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation) at discretion of treating physician, were included. EXPOSURES: Patients were categorized into three exposure groups: intubation-first, intubation after NIV, or NIV-only. PRIMARY OUTCOME: 30-day all-cause mortality, a predetermined outcome measured by multivariable logistic regression. Data are presented with medians and interquartile ranges, or percentages with 95% confidence intervals, for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Covariates for the model were age, sex, qSOFA score ≥ 2, presenting oxygen saturation, vasopressor use, and greater than three comorbidities. A secondary multivariable model compared mortality of all patients that received NIV (intubation after NIV and NIV-only) with the intubation-first group. RESULTS: A total of 222 were enrolled. Overall mortality was 77.5% (95%CI, 72–83%). Mortality for intubation-first group was 82% (95%CI, 73–89%; 75/91), for Intubation after NIV was 84% (95%CI, 70–92%; 37/44), and for NIV-only was 69% (95%CI, 59–78%; 60/87). In multivariable analysis, NIV-only was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95%CI, 0.13–0.69). No difference in mortality was observed between intubation-first and intubation after NIV. Secondary analysis found all patients who received NIV to have lower mortality than patients who were intubated only (OR: 0.44, 95%CI, 0.21–0.95). CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Utilization of NIV as the initial intervention in COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support is associated with significant survival benefit. For patients intubated after NIV, the mortality rate is not worse than those who undergo intubation as their initial intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7844386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78443862021-01-29 Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support Daniel, Pia Mecklenburg, Max Massiah, Chanée Joseph, Michael A. Wilson, Clara Parmar, Priyanka Rosengarten, Sabrina Maini, Rohan Kim, Julie Oomen, Alvin Zehtabchi, Shahriar Am J Emerg Med Article IMPORTANCE: Initial guidelines recommended prompt endotracheal intubation rather than non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for COVID-19 patients requiring ventilator support. There is insufficient data comparing the impact of intubation versus NIV on patient-centered outcomes of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare all-cause 30-day mortality for hospitalized COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure who underwent intubation first, intubation after NIV, or NIV only. DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients admitted in March and April of 2020. SETTING: A teaching hospital in Brooklyn, New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Adult COVID-19 confirmed patients who required ventilator support (non-invasive ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation) at discretion of treating physician, were included. EXPOSURES: Patients were categorized into three exposure groups: intubation-first, intubation after NIV, or NIV-only. PRIMARY OUTCOME: 30-day all-cause mortality, a predetermined outcome measured by multivariable logistic regression. Data are presented with medians and interquartile ranges, or percentages with 95% confidence intervals, for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Covariates for the model were age, sex, qSOFA score ≥ 2, presenting oxygen saturation, vasopressor use, and greater than three comorbidities. A secondary multivariable model compared mortality of all patients that received NIV (intubation after NIV and NIV-only) with the intubation-first group. RESULTS: A total of 222 were enrolled. Overall mortality was 77.5% (95%CI, 72–83%). Mortality for intubation-first group was 82% (95%CI, 73–89%; 75/91), for Intubation after NIV was 84% (95%CI, 70–92%; 37/44), and for NIV-only was 69% (95%CI, 59–78%; 60/87). In multivariable analysis, NIV-only was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95%CI, 0.13–0.69). No difference in mortality was observed between intubation-first and intubation after NIV. Secondary analysis found all patients who received NIV to have lower mortality than patients who were intubated only (OR: 0.44, 95%CI, 0.21–0.95). CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Utilization of NIV as the initial intervention in COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support is associated with significant survival benefit. For patients intubated after NIV, the mortality rate is not worse than those who undergo intubation as their initial intervention. Elsevier Inc. 2021-05 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7844386/ /pubmed/33550100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.068 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Daniel, Pia
Mecklenburg, Max
Massiah, Chanée
Joseph, Michael A.
Wilson, Clara
Parmar, Priyanka
Rosengarten, Sabrina
Maini, Rohan
Kim, Julie
Oomen, Alvin
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title_full Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title_fullStr Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title_short Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
title_sort non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus endotracheal intubation in treatment of covid-19 patients requiring ventilatory support
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.068
work_keys_str_mv AT danielpia noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT mecklenburgmax noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT massiahchanee noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT josephmichaela noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT wilsonclara noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT parmarpriyanka noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT rosengartensabrina noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT mainirohan noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT kimjulie noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT oomenalvin noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport
AT zehtabchishahriar noninvasivepositivepressureventilationversusendotrachealintubationintreatmentofcovid19patientsrequiringventilatorysupport