Cargando…

Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paterson, Charlotte, Leduc, Caleb, Maxwell, Margaret, Aust, Birgit, Amann, Benedikt L., Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda, Coppens, Evelien, Couwenbergh, Chrisje, O’Connor, Cliodhna, Arensman, Ella, Greiner, Birgit A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33509258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9
_version_ 1783644451401367552
author Paterson, Charlotte
Leduc, Caleb
Maxwell, Margaret
Aust, Birgit
Amann, Benedikt L.
Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda
Coppens, Evelien
Couwenbergh, Chrisje
O’Connor, Cliodhna
Arensman, Ella
Greiner, Birgit A.
author_facet Paterson, Charlotte
Leduc, Caleb
Maxwell, Margaret
Aust, Birgit
Amann, Benedikt L.
Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda
Coppens, Evelien
Couwenbergh, Chrisje
O’Connor, Cliodhna
Arensman, Ella
Greiner, Birgit A.
author_sort Paterson, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall’s model of organisational-level interventions and Moore’s sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings. DISCUSSION: This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Research Registry (reviewregistry897) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7844910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78449102021-02-01 Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol Paterson, Charlotte Leduc, Caleb Maxwell, Margaret Aust, Birgit Amann, Benedikt L. Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda Coppens, Evelien Couwenbergh, Chrisje O’Connor, Cliodhna Arensman, Ella Greiner, Birgit A. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall’s model of organisational-level interventions and Moore’s sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings. DISCUSSION: This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Research Registry (reviewregistry897) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9. BioMed Central 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7844910/ /pubmed/33509258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Paterson, Charlotte
Leduc, Caleb
Maxwell, Margaret
Aust, Birgit
Amann, Benedikt L.
Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda
Coppens, Evelien
Couwenbergh, Chrisje
O’Connor, Cliodhna
Arensman, Ella
Greiner, Birgit A.
Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_short Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_sort evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7844910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33509258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9
work_keys_str_mv AT patersoncharlotte evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT leduccaleb evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT maxwellmargaret evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT austbirgit evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT amannbenediktl evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT cergapashojaarlinda evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT coppensevelien evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT couwenberghchrisje evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT oconnorcliodhna evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT arensmanella evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT greinerbirgita evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol