Cargando…

A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery

BACKGROUND: The Improving Wisely intervention is a peer-to-peer audit and feedback intervention to reduce overuse of Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS). The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation to evaluate Mohs surgeons’ perceptions of the implementation quality and perceived imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fahim, Christine, Bruhn, William E., Albertini, John G., Makary, Marty A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06017-4
_version_ 1783644472398053376
author Fahim, Christine
Bruhn, William E.
Albertini, John G.
Makary, Marty A.
author_facet Fahim, Christine
Bruhn, William E.
Albertini, John G.
Makary, Marty A.
author_sort Fahim, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Improving Wisely intervention is a peer-to-peer audit and feedback intervention to reduce overuse of Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS). The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation to evaluate Mohs surgeons’ perceptions of the implementation quality and perceived impact of the Improving Wisely intervention. METHODS: Surgeons in the Improving Wisely intervention arm, comprised of members of the American College of Mohs Surgeons (ACMS) who co-led the intervention, were invited to complete surveys and key informant interviews. Participants described perceptions of implementation quality (evaluated via dose, quality of implementation, reach and participant responsiveness), perceived impact of the Improving Wisely intervention (evaluated on a 1–5 Likert and qualitatively), and barriers and facilitators to changing surgeons’ clinical practice patterns to reduce Mohs overuse. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-seven surgeons participated in the survey. 89% were supportive of the intervention. Participants agreed that the intervention would improve patient care and reduce the annual costs of Mohs surgery. Thirty surgeons participated in key informant interviews. 93% were interested in receiving additional data reports in the future. Participants recommended the reports be disseminated annually, that the reports be expanded to include appropriateness data, and that the intervention be extended to non ACMS members. Six themes identifying factors impacting potential MMS overuse were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were strongly supportive of the intervention. We present the template used to design and implement the Improving Wisely intervention and provide suggestions for specialty societies interested in leading similar quality improvement interventions among their members. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-06017-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7845024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78450242021-02-01 A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery Fahim, Christine Bruhn, William E. Albertini, John G. Makary, Marty A. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Improving Wisely intervention is a peer-to-peer audit and feedback intervention to reduce overuse of Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS). The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation to evaluate Mohs surgeons’ perceptions of the implementation quality and perceived impact of the Improving Wisely intervention. METHODS: Surgeons in the Improving Wisely intervention arm, comprised of members of the American College of Mohs Surgeons (ACMS) who co-led the intervention, were invited to complete surveys and key informant interviews. Participants described perceptions of implementation quality (evaluated via dose, quality of implementation, reach and participant responsiveness), perceived impact of the Improving Wisely intervention (evaluated on a 1–5 Likert and qualitatively), and barriers and facilitators to changing surgeons’ clinical practice patterns to reduce Mohs overuse. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-seven surgeons participated in the survey. 89% were supportive of the intervention. Participants agreed that the intervention would improve patient care and reduce the annual costs of Mohs surgery. Thirty surgeons participated in key informant interviews. 93% were interested in receiving additional data reports in the future. Participants recommended the reports be disseminated annually, that the reports be expanded to include appropriateness data, and that the intervention be extended to non ACMS members. Six themes identifying factors impacting potential MMS overuse were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were strongly supportive of the intervention. We present the template used to design and implement the Improving Wisely intervention and provide suggestions for specialty societies interested in leading similar quality improvement interventions among their members. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-06017-4. BioMed Central 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7845024/ /pubmed/33514362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06017-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fahim, Christine
Bruhn, William E.
Albertini, John G.
Makary, Marty A.
A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title_full A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title_fullStr A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title_full_unstemmed A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title_short A process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
title_sort process evaluation of the improving wisely intervention: a peer-to-peer data intervention to reduce overuse in surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06017-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fahimchristine aprocessevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT bruhnwilliame aprocessevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT albertinijohng aprocessevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT makarymartya aprocessevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT fahimchristine processevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT bruhnwilliame processevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT albertinijohng processevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery
AT makarymartya processevaluationoftheimprovingwiselyinterventionapeertopeerdatainterventiontoreduceoveruseinsurgery