Cargando…

Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial

BACKGROUND: Offspring of women with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal growth patterns which are associated with perinatal morbidity. Our aim was to compare rates of large- and small-for-gestational age (LGA; SGA) defined according to different criteria, using data from the Continuous Gl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meek, Claire L., Corcoy, Rosa, Asztalos, Elizabeth, Kusinski, Laura C., López, Esther, Feig, Denice S., Murphy, Helen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6
_version_ 1783644474822361088
author Meek, Claire L.
Corcoy, Rosa
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Kusinski, Laura C.
López, Esther
Feig, Denice S.
Murphy, Helen R.
author_facet Meek, Claire L.
Corcoy, Rosa
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Kusinski, Laura C.
López, Esther
Feig, Denice S.
Murphy, Helen R.
author_sort Meek, Claire L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Offspring of women with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal growth patterns which are associated with perinatal morbidity. Our aim was to compare rates of large- and small-for-gestational age (LGA; SGA) defined according to different criteria, using data from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT). METHODS: This was a pre-specified analysis of CONCEPTT involving 225 pregnant women and liveborn infants from 31 international centres (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01788527; registered 11/2/2013). Infants were weighed immediately at birth and GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO centiles were calculated. Relative risk ratios, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the different growth standards with respect to perinatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and a composite neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Accelerated fetal growth was common, with mean birthweight percentiles of 82.1, 85.7 and 63.9 and LGA rates of 62, 67 and 30% using GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO standards respectively. Corresponding rates of SGA were 2.2, 1.3 and 8.9% respectively. LGA defined according to GROW centiles showed stronger associations with preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and NICU admission. Infants born > 97.7th centile were at highest risk of complications. SGA defined according to INTERGROWTH centiles showed slightly stronger associations with perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: GROW and INTERGROWTH standards performed similarly and identified similar numbers of neonates with LGA and SGA. GROW-defined LGA and INTERGROWTH-defined SGA had slightly stronger associations with neonatal complications. WHO standards underestimated size in preterm infants and are less applicable for use in type 1 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. number NCT01788527. Trial registered 11/2/2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7845036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78450362021-02-01 Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial Meek, Claire L. Corcoy, Rosa Asztalos, Elizabeth Kusinski, Laura C. López, Esther Feig, Denice S. Murphy, Helen R. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Offspring of women with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal growth patterns which are associated with perinatal morbidity. Our aim was to compare rates of large- and small-for-gestational age (LGA; SGA) defined according to different criteria, using data from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT). METHODS: This was a pre-specified analysis of CONCEPTT involving 225 pregnant women and liveborn infants from 31 international centres (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01788527; registered 11/2/2013). Infants were weighed immediately at birth and GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO centiles were calculated. Relative risk ratios, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the different growth standards with respect to perinatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and a composite neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Accelerated fetal growth was common, with mean birthweight percentiles of 82.1, 85.7 and 63.9 and LGA rates of 62, 67 and 30% using GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO standards respectively. Corresponding rates of SGA were 2.2, 1.3 and 8.9% respectively. LGA defined according to GROW centiles showed stronger associations with preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and NICU admission. Infants born > 97.7th centile were at highest risk of complications. SGA defined according to INTERGROWTH centiles showed slightly stronger associations with perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: GROW and INTERGROWTH standards performed similarly and identified similar numbers of neonates with LGA and SGA. GROW-defined LGA and INTERGROWTH-defined SGA had slightly stronger associations with neonatal complications. WHO standards underestimated size in preterm infants and are less applicable for use in type 1 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. number NCT01788527. Trial registered 11/2/2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6. BioMed Central 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7845036/ /pubmed/33514342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meek, Claire L.
Corcoy, Rosa
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Kusinski, Laura C.
López, Esther
Feig, Denice S.
Murphy, Helen R.
Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title_full Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title_fullStr Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title_full_unstemmed Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title_short Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial
title_sort which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? a pre-specified analysis of the conceptt trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6
work_keys_str_mv AT meekclairel whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT corcoyrosa whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT asztaloselizabeth whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT kusinskilaurac whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT lopezesther whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT feigdenices whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT murphyhelenr whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial
AT whichgrowthstandardsshouldbeusedtoidentifylargeandsmallforgestationalageinfantsofmotherswithtype1diabetesaprespecifiedanalysisoftheconceptttrial