Cargando…

Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) induce artifacts in the ECG that may provoque inaccurate rhythm classification by the algorithm of the defibrillator. The objective of this study was to design an algorithm to produce reliable shock/no-shock decisions during CPR using con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isasi, Iraia, Irusta, Unai, Aramendi, Elisabete, Eftestøl, Trygve, Kramer-Johansen, Jo, Wik, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060595
_version_ 1783644616142094336
author Isasi, Iraia
Irusta, Unai
Aramendi, Elisabete
Eftestøl, Trygve
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Wik, Lars
author_facet Isasi, Iraia
Irusta, Unai
Aramendi, Elisabete
Eftestøl, Trygve
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Wik, Lars
author_sort Isasi, Iraia
collection PubMed
description Chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) induce artifacts in the ECG that may provoque inaccurate rhythm classification by the algorithm of the defibrillator. The objective of this study was to design an algorithm to produce reliable shock/no-shock decisions during CPR using convolutional neural networks (CNN). A total of 3319 ECG segments of 9 [Formula: see text] extracted during chest compressions were used, whereof 586 were shockable and 2733 nonshockable. Chest compression artifacts were removed using a Recursive Least Squares (RLS) filter, and the filtered ECG was fed to a CNN classifier with three convolutional blocks and two fully connected layers for the shock/no-shock classification. A 5-fold cross validation architecture was adopted to train/test the algorithm, and the proccess was repeated 100 times to statistically characterize the performance. The proposed architecture was compared to the most accurate algorithms that include handcrafted ECG features and a random forest classifier (baseline model). The median (90% confidence interval) sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and balanced accuracy of the method were 95.8% (94.6–96.8), 96.1% (95.8–96.5), 96.1% (95.7–96.4) and 96.0% (95.5–96.5), respectively. The proposed algorithm outperformed the baseline model by 0.6-points in accuracy. This new approach shows the potential of deep learning methods to provide reliable diagnosis of the cardiac rhythm without interrupting chest compression therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7845778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78457782021-02-24 Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks Isasi, Iraia Irusta, Unai Aramendi, Elisabete Eftestøl, Trygve Kramer-Johansen, Jo Wik, Lars Entropy (Basel) Article Chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) induce artifacts in the ECG that may provoque inaccurate rhythm classification by the algorithm of the defibrillator. The objective of this study was to design an algorithm to produce reliable shock/no-shock decisions during CPR using convolutional neural networks (CNN). A total of 3319 ECG segments of 9 [Formula: see text] extracted during chest compressions were used, whereof 586 were shockable and 2733 nonshockable. Chest compression artifacts were removed using a Recursive Least Squares (RLS) filter, and the filtered ECG was fed to a CNN classifier with three convolutional blocks and two fully connected layers for the shock/no-shock classification. A 5-fold cross validation architecture was adopted to train/test the algorithm, and the proccess was repeated 100 times to statistically characterize the performance. The proposed architecture was compared to the most accurate algorithms that include handcrafted ECG features and a random forest classifier (baseline model). The median (90% confidence interval) sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and balanced accuracy of the method were 95.8% (94.6–96.8), 96.1% (95.8–96.5), 96.1% (95.7–96.4) and 96.0% (95.5–96.5), respectively. The proposed algorithm outperformed the baseline model by 0.6-points in accuracy. This new approach shows the potential of deep learning methods to provide reliable diagnosis of the cardiac rhythm without interrupting chest compression therapy. MDPI 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7845778/ /pubmed/33286367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060595 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Isasi, Iraia
Irusta, Unai
Aramendi, Elisabete
Eftestøl, Trygve
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Wik, Lars
Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title_fullStr Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title_short Rhythm Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Convolutional Neural Networks
title_sort rhythm analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using convolutional neural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7845778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060595
work_keys_str_mv AT isasiiraia rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT irustaunai rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT aramendielisabete rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT eftestøltrygve rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT kramerjohansenjo rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT wiklars rhythmanalysisduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks