Cargando…
Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection
INTRODUCTION: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mild disease with non-specific symptoms, although a few becoming critically ill with septic shock and multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552376 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.26881 |
_version_ | 1783644703143493632 |
---|---|
author | Ndwandwe, Duduzile Mathebula, Lindi Adetokunboh, Olatunji Kamadjeu, Raoul Wiysonge, Charles Shey |
author_facet | Ndwandwe, Duduzile Mathebula, Lindi Adetokunboh, Olatunji Kamadjeu, Raoul Wiysonge, Charles Shey |
author_sort | Ndwandwe, Duduzile |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mild disease with non-specific symptoms, although a few becoming critically ill with septic shock and multiple organ failure. There is an unknown proportion of infected individuals who remain asymptomatic and infectious. Universal screening for COVID-19 infections to detect individuals who are infected before they present clinically could therefore be an important measure to contain the spread of the disease. We highlight a Cochrane rapid review which assessed the effectiveness and accuracy of universal screening for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: the authors of the Cochrane review searched multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the effectiveness of universal screening and reporting on screening test accuracy. Eligible participants for the review included people who had not sought care for potential COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: the authors included 22 publications, with none of them conducted in Africa. Two modelling studies reported on the beneficial and negative effects of screening; and 20 studies (cohort and modelling) reported data on the accuracy of screening tests. The included studies had wide variability in the baseline prevalence of COVID-19 infection as well as study settings and methods. All cohort studies compared screening strategies to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the gold standard. The rapid review suggests that there is low certainty of evidence that screening at travel hubs may slow the importation of infected cases. Furthermore, the review highlights the uncertainty and variation in the accuracy of screening. CONCLUSION: given the low accuracy of the tests included in this review, a high proportion of COVID-19 infected individuals may be missed and go on to infect others. In addition, some healthy individuals may be falsely identified as positive, requiring confirmatory testing and potentially leading to the unnecessary isolation of these individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78462602021-02-05 Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection Ndwandwe, Duduzile Mathebula, Lindi Adetokunboh, Olatunji Kamadjeu, Raoul Wiysonge, Charles Shey Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mild disease with non-specific symptoms, although a few becoming critically ill with septic shock and multiple organ failure. There is an unknown proportion of infected individuals who remain asymptomatic and infectious. Universal screening for COVID-19 infections to detect individuals who are infected before they present clinically could therefore be an important measure to contain the spread of the disease. We highlight a Cochrane rapid review which assessed the effectiveness and accuracy of universal screening for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: the authors of the Cochrane review searched multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the effectiveness of universal screening and reporting on screening test accuracy. Eligible participants for the review included people who had not sought care for potential COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: the authors included 22 publications, with none of them conducted in Africa. Two modelling studies reported on the beneficial and negative effects of screening; and 20 studies (cohort and modelling) reported data on the accuracy of screening tests. The included studies had wide variability in the baseline prevalence of COVID-19 infection as well as study settings and methods. All cohort studies compared screening strategies to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the gold standard. The rapid review suggests that there is low certainty of evidence that screening at travel hubs may slow the importation of infected cases. Furthermore, the review highlights the uncertainty and variation in the accuracy of screening. CONCLUSION: given the low accuracy of the tests included in this review, a high proportion of COVID-19 infected individuals may be missed and go on to infect others. In addition, some healthy individuals may be falsely identified as positive, requiring confirmatory testing and potentially leading to the unnecessary isolation of these individuals. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7846260/ /pubmed/33552376 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.26881 Text en Copyright: Duduzile Ndwandwe et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ndwandwe, Duduzile Mathebula, Lindi Adetokunboh, Olatunji Kamadjeu, Raoul Wiysonge, Charles Shey Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title | Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full | Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_fullStr | Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_short | Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_sort | cochrane corner: universal screening for sars-cov-2 infection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552376 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.26881 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ndwandweduduzile cochranecorneruniversalscreeningforsarscov2infection AT mathebulalindi cochranecorneruniversalscreeningforsarscov2infection AT adetokunboholatunji cochranecorneruniversalscreeningforsarscov2infection AT kamadjeuraoul cochranecorneruniversalscreeningforsarscov2infection AT wiysongecharlesshey cochranecorneruniversalscreeningforsarscov2infection |