Cargando…
Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005 |
_version_ | 1783644719347138560 |
---|---|
author | Ferrat, Emilie Fabre, Julie Galletout, Philippe Boutin, Emmanuelle Le Breton, Julien Renard, Vincent Frappé, Paul Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie |
author_facet | Ferrat, Emilie Fabre, Julie Galletout, Philippe Boutin, Emmanuelle Le Breton, Julien Renard, Vincent Frappé, Paul Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie |
author_sort | Ferrat, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing. AIM: To describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014. METHOD: A total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing). RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage (n = 374, 33.7%), particularly under-dosing (n = 348, 31.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors independently associated with under-dosing were older age, prescription of apixaban or dabigatran, and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 vs. a score = 1. Factors with over-dosing were kidney failure, a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and older age. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78463502021-02-01 Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care Ferrat, Emilie Fabre, Julie Galletout, Philippe Boutin, Emmanuelle Le Breton, Julien Renard, Vincent Frappé, Paul Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing. AIM: To describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014. METHOD: A total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing). RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage (n = 374, 33.7%), particularly under-dosing (n = 348, 31.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors independently associated with under-dosing were older age, prescription of apixaban or dabigatran, and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 vs. a score = 1. Factors with over-dosing were kidney failure, a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and older age. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7846350/ /pubmed/33495204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005 Text en © The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Ferrat, Emilie Fabre, Julie Galletout, Philippe Boutin, Emmanuelle Le Breton, Julien Renard, Vincent Frappé, Paul Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title | Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title_full | Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title_fullStr | Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title_short | Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care |
title_sort | inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the french cacao cohort study in primary care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferratemilie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT fabrejulie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT galletoutphilippe inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT boutinemmanuelle inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT lebretonjulien inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT renardvincent inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT frappepaul inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare AT bastujigarinsylvie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare |