Cargando…

Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrat, Emilie, Fabre, Julie, Galletout, Philippe, Boutin, Emmanuelle, Le Breton, Julien, Renard, Vincent, Frappé, Paul, Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005
_version_ 1783644719347138560
author Ferrat, Emilie
Fabre, Julie
Galletout, Philippe
Boutin, Emmanuelle
Le Breton, Julien
Renard, Vincent
Frappé, Paul
Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
author_facet Ferrat, Emilie
Fabre, Julie
Galletout, Philippe
Boutin, Emmanuelle
Le Breton, Julien
Renard, Vincent
Frappé, Paul
Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
author_sort Ferrat, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing. AIM: To describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014. METHOD: A total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing). RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage (n = 374, 33.7%), particularly under-dosing (n = 348, 31.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors independently associated with under-dosing were older age, prescription of apixaban or dabigatran, and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 vs. a score = 1. Factors with over-dosing were kidney failure, a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and older age. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7846350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78463502021-02-01 Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care Ferrat, Emilie Fabre, Julie Galletout, Philippe Boutin, Emmanuelle Le Breton, Julien Renard, Vincent Frappé, Paul Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing. AIM: To describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014. METHOD: A total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing). RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage (n = 374, 33.7%), particularly under-dosing (n = 348, 31.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors independently associated with under-dosing were older age, prescription of apixaban or dabigatran, and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 vs. a score = 1. Factors with over-dosing were kidney failure, a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and older age. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7846350/ /pubmed/33495204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005 Text en © The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Ferrat, Emilie
Fabre, Julie
Galletout, Philippe
Boutin, Emmanuelle
Le Breton, Julien
Renard, Vincent
Frappé, Paul
Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title_full Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title_fullStr Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title_short Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care
title_sort inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the french cacao cohort study in primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714005
work_keys_str_mv AT ferratemilie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT fabrejulie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT galletoutphilippe inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT boutinemmanuelle inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT lebretonjulien inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT renardvincent inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT frappepaul inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare
AT bastujigarinsylvie inappropriatedirectoralanticoagulantprescriptionsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationcrosssectionalanalysisofthefrenchcacaocohortstudyinprimarycare