Cargando…
Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Web-based respondent-driven sampling is a novel sampling method for the recruitment of participants for generating population estimates, studying social network characteristics, and delivering health interventions. However, the application, barriers and facilitators, and recruitment perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33448935 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17564 |
_version_ | 1783644732129280000 |
---|---|
author | Helms, Yannick B Hamdiui, Nora Kretzschmar, Mirjam E E Rocha, Luis E C van Steenbergen, Jim E Bengtsson, Linus Thorson, Anna Timen, Aura Stein, Mart L |
author_facet | Helms, Yannick B Hamdiui, Nora Kretzschmar, Mirjam E E Rocha, Luis E C van Steenbergen, Jim E Bengtsson, Linus Thorson, Anna Timen, Aura Stein, Mart L |
author_sort | Helms, Yannick B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Web-based respondent-driven sampling is a novel sampling method for the recruitment of participants for generating population estimates, studying social network characteristics, and delivering health interventions. However, the application, barriers and facilitators, and recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling have not yet been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to provide an overview of published research using web-based respondent-driven sampling and to investigate factors related to the recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review on web-based respondent-driven sampling studies published between 2000 and 2019. We used the process evaluation of complex interventions framework to gain insights into how web-based respondent-driven sampling was implemented, what mechanisms of impact drove recruitment, what the role of context was in the study, and how these components together influenced the recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling. RESULTS: We included 18 studies from 8 countries (high- and low-middle income countries), in which web-based respondent-driven sampling was used for making population estimates (n=12), studying social network characteristics (n=3), and delivering health-related interventions (n=3). Studies used web-based respondent-driven sampling to recruit between 19 and 3448 participants from a variety of target populations. Studies differed greatly in the number of seeds recruited, the proportion of successfully recruiting participants, the number of recruitment waves, the type of incentives offered to participants, and the duration of data collection. Studies that recruited relatively more seeds, through online platforms, and with less rigorous selection procedures reported relatively low percentages of successfully recruiting seeds. Studies that did not offer at least one guaranteed material incentive reported relatively fewer waves and lower percentages of successfully recruiting participants. The time of data collection was shortest in studies with university students. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based respondent-driven sampling can be successfully applied to recruit individuals for making population estimates, studying social network characteristics, and delivering health interventions. In general, seed and peer recruitment may be enhanced by rigorously selecting and motivating seeds, offering at least one guaranteed material incentive, and facilitating adequate recruitment options regarding the target population’s online connectedness and communication behavior. Potential trade-offs should be taken into account when implementing web-based respondent-driven sampling, such as having less opportunities to implement rigorous seed selection procedures when recruiting many seeds, as well as issues around online rather than physical participation, such as the risk of cheaters participating repeatedly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78464412021-02-01 Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review Helms, Yannick B Hamdiui, Nora Kretzschmar, Mirjam E E Rocha, Luis E C van Steenbergen, Jim E Bengtsson, Linus Thorson, Anna Timen, Aura Stein, Mart L J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Web-based respondent-driven sampling is a novel sampling method for the recruitment of participants for generating population estimates, studying social network characteristics, and delivering health interventions. However, the application, barriers and facilitators, and recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling have not yet been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to provide an overview of published research using web-based respondent-driven sampling and to investigate factors related to the recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review on web-based respondent-driven sampling studies published between 2000 and 2019. We used the process evaluation of complex interventions framework to gain insights into how web-based respondent-driven sampling was implemented, what mechanisms of impact drove recruitment, what the role of context was in the study, and how these components together influenced the recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling. RESULTS: We included 18 studies from 8 countries (high- and low-middle income countries), in which web-based respondent-driven sampling was used for making population estimates (n=12), studying social network characteristics (n=3), and delivering health-related interventions (n=3). Studies used web-based respondent-driven sampling to recruit between 19 and 3448 participants from a variety of target populations. Studies differed greatly in the number of seeds recruited, the proportion of successfully recruiting participants, the number of recruitment waves, the type of incentives offered to participants, and the duration of data collection. Studies that recruited relatively more seeds, through online platforms, and with less rigorous selection procedures reported relatively low percentages of successfully recruiting seeds. Studies that did not offer at least one guaranteed material incentive reported relatively fewer waves and lower percentages of successfully recruiting participants. The time of data collection was shortest in studies with university students. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based respondent-driven sampling can be successfully applied to recruit individuals for making population estimates, studying social network characteristics, and delivering health interventions. In general, seed and peer recruitment may be enhanced by rigorously selecting and motivating seeds, offering at least one guaranteed material incentive, and facilitating adequate recruitment options regarding the target population’s online connectedness and communication behavior. Potential trade-offs should be taken into account when implementing web-based respondent-driven sampling, such as having less opportunities to implement rigorous seed selection procedures when recruiting many seeds, as well as issues around online rather than physical participation, such as the risk of cheaters participating repeatedly. JMIR Publications 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7846441/ /pubmed/33448935 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17564 Text en ©Yannick B Helms, Nora Hamdiui, Mirjam E E Kretzschmar, Luis E C Rocha, Jim E van Steenbergen, Linus Bengtsson, Anna Thorson, Aura Timen, Mart L Stein. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Helms, Yannick B Hamdiui, Nora Kretzschmar, Mirjam E E Rocha, Luis E C van Steenbergen, Jim E Bengtsson, Linus Thorson, Anna Timen, Aura Stein, Mart L Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title | Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title_full | Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title_short | Applications and Recruitment Performance of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling: Scoping Review |
title_sort | applications and recruitment performance of web-based respondent-driven sampling: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33448935 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helmsyannickb applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT hamdiuinora applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT kretzschmarmirjamee applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT rochaluisec applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT vansteenbergenjime applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT bengtssonlinus applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT thorsonanna applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT timenaura applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview AT steinmartl applicationsandrecruitmentperformanceofwebbasedrespondentdrivensamplingscopingreview |