Cargando…
Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China
BACKGROUND: Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihype...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001360 |
_version_ | 1783644744590557184 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Shu-Yuan Tao, Li-Yuan Yang, Yun-Yun Kong, Tao Wu, Cun-Jin Wang, Yang Chen, Jing-Zhou Song, Lei Wang, Yi-Bo Hui, Ru-Tai Zhang, Wei-Li |
author_facet | Zhang, Shu-Yuan Tao, Li-Yuan Yang, Yun-Yun Kong, Tao Wu, Cun-Jin Wang, Yang Chen, Jing-Zhou Song, Lei Wang, Yi-Bo Hui, Ru-Tai Zhang, Wei-Li |
author_sort | Zhang, Shu-Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs. METHODS: In a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was –7.9 mmHg (95% CI, –9.9 to –5.9) in the brand-name drug group and –7.1 mmHg (95% CI, –9.1 to –5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2–2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78464982021-02-05 Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China Zhang, Shu-Yuan Tao, Li-Yuan Yang, Yun-Yun Kong, Tao Wu, Cun-Jin Wang, Yang Chen, Jing-Zhou Song, Lei Wang, Yi-Bo Hui, Ru-Tai Zhang, Wei-Li Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs. METHODS: In a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was –7.9 mmHg (95% CI, –9.9 to –5.9) in the brand-name drug group and –7.1 mmHg (95% CI, –9.1 to –5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2–2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-05 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7846498/ /pubmed/33470655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001360 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zhang, Shu-Yuan Tao, Li-Yuan Yang, Yun-Yun Kong, Tao Wu, Cun-Jin Wang, Yang Chen, Jing-Zhou Song, Lei Wang, Yi-Bo Hui, Ru-Tai Zhang, Wei-Li Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title | Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title_full | Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title_short | Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China |
title_sort | evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in china |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangshuyuan evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT taoliyuan evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT yangyunyun evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT kongtao evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT wucunjin evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT wangyang evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT chenjingzhou evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT songlei evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT wangyibo evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT huirutai evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina AT zhangweili evaluationofbloodpressureloweringeffectbygenericandbrandnameantihypertensivedrugstreatmentamulticenterprospectivestudyinchina |