Cargando…

Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback

Binary reward feedback on movement success is sufficient for learning some simple sensorimotor mappings in a reaching task, but not for some other tasks in which multiple kinematic factors contribute to performance. The critical condition for learning in more complex tasks remains unclear. Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Kooij, Katinka, van Mastrigt, Nina M., Crowe, Emily M., Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80155-x
_version_ 1783644756987871232
author van der Kooij, Katinka
van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Crowe, Emily M.
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
author_facet van der Kooij, Katinka
van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Crowe, Emily M.
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
author_sort van der Kooij, Katinka
collection PubMed
description Binary reward feedback on movement success is sufficient for learning some simple sensorimotor mappings in a reaching task, but not for some other tasks in which multiple kinematic factors contribute to performance. The critical condition for learning in more complex tasks remains unclear. Here, we investigate whether reward-based motor learning is possible in a multi-dimensional trajectory matching task and whether simplifying the task by providing feedback on one factor at a time (‘factorized feedback’) can improve learning. In two experiments, participants performed a trajectory matching task in which learning was measured as a reduction in the error. In Experiment 1, participants matched a straight trajectory slanted in depth. We factorized the task by providing feedback on the slant error, the length error, or on their composite. In Experiment 2, participants matched a curved trajectory, also slanted in depth. In this experiment, we factorized the feedback by providing feedback on the slant error, the curvature error, or on the integral difference between the matched and target trajectory. In Experiment 1, there was anecdotal evidence that participants learnt the multidimensional task. Factorization did not improve learning. In Experiment 2, there was anecdotal evidence the multidimensional task could not be learnt. We conclude that, within a complexity range, multiple kinematic factors can be learnt in parallel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7846559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78465592021-02-01 Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback van der Kooij, Katinka van Mastrigt, Nina M. Crowe, Emily M. Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Sci Rep Article Binary reward feedback on movement success is sufficient for learning some simple sensorimotor mappings in a reaching task, but not for some other tasks in which multiple kinematic factors contribute to performance. The critical condition for learning in more complex tasks remains unclear. Here, we investigate whether reward-based motor learning is possible in a multi-dimensional trajectory matching task and whether simplifying the task by providing feedback on one factor at a time (‘factorized feedback’) can improve learning. In two experiments, participants performed a trajectory matching task in which learning was measured as a reduction in the error. In Experiment 1, participants matched a straight trajectory slanted in depth. We factorized the task by providing feedback on the slant error, the length error, or on their composite. In Experiment 2, participants matched a curved trajectory, also slanted in depth. In this experiment, we factorized the feedback by providing feedback on the slant error, the curvature error, or on the integral difference between the matched and target trajectory. In Experiment 1, there was anecdotal evidence that participants learnt the multidimensional task. Factorization did not improve learning. In Experiment 2, there was anecdotal evidence the multidimensional task could not be learnt. We conclude that, within a complexity range, multiple kinematic factors can be learnt in parallel. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7846559/ /pubmed/33514779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80155-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van der Kooij, Katinka
van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Crowe, Emily M.
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title_full Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title_fullStr Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title_full_unstemmed Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title_short Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
title_sort learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80155-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderkooijkatinka learningareachtrajectorybasedonbinaryrewardfeedback
AT vanmastrigtninam learningareachtrajectorybasedonbinaryrewardfeedback
AT croweemilym learningareachtrajectorybasedonbinaryrewardfeedback
AT smeetsjeroenbj learningareachtrajectorybasedonbinaryrewardfeedback