Cargando…
Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems
Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models are a key tool to understand complex mechanisms in systems biology. These models are studied using various approaches, including stability and bifurcation analysis, but most frequently by numerical simulations. The number of required simulations is often l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82196-2 |
_version_ | 1783644768404766720 |
---|---|
author | Städter, Philipp Schälte, Yannik Schmiester, Leonard Hasenauer, Jan Stapor, Paul L. |
author_facet | Städter, Philipp Schälte, Yannik Schmiester, Leonard Hasenauer, Jan Stapor, Paul L. |
author_sort | Städter, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models are a key tool to understand complex mechanisms in systems biology. These models are studied using various approaches, including stability and bifurcation analysis, but most frequently by numerical simulations. The number of required simulations is often large, e.g., when unknown parameters need to be inferred. This renders efficient and reliable numerical integration methods essential. However, these methods depend on various hyperparameters, which strongly impact the ODE solution. Despite this, and although hundreds of published ODE models are freely available in public databases, a thorough study that quantifies the impact of hyperparameters on the ODE solver in terms of accuracy and computation time is still missing. In this manuscript, we investigate which choices of algorithms and hyperparameters are generally favorable when dealing with ODE models arising from biological processes. To ensure a representative evaluation, we considered 142 published models. Our study provides evidence that most ODEs in computational biology are stiff, and we give guidelines for the choice of algorithms and hyperparameters. We anticipate that our results will help researchers in systems biology to choose appropriate numerical methods when dealing with ODE models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78466082021-02-01 Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems Städter, Philipp Schälte, Yannik Schmiester, Leonard Hasenauer, Jan Stapor, Paul L. Sci Rep Article Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models are a key tool to understand complex mechanisms in systems biology. These models are studied using various approaches, including stability and bifurcation analysis, but most frequently by numerical simulations. The number of required simulations is often large, e.g., when unknown parameters need to be inferred. This renders efficient and reliable numerical integration methods essential. However, these methods depend on various hyperparameters, which strongly impact the ODE solution. Despite this, and although hundreds of published ODE models are freely available in public databases, a thorough study that quantifies the impact of hyperparameters on the ODE solver in terms of accuracy and computation time is still missing. In this manuscript, we investigate which choices of algorithms and hyperparameters are generally favorable when dealing with ODE models arising from biological processes. To ensure a representative evaluation, we considered 142 published models. Our study provides evidence that most ODEs in computational biology are stiff, and we give guidelines for the choice of algorithms and hyperparameters. We anticipate that our results will help researchers in systems biology to choose appropriate numerical methods when dealing with ODE models. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7846608/ /pubmed/33514831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82196-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Städter, Philipp Schälte, Yannik Schmiester, Leonard Hasenauer, Jan Stapor, Paul L. Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title | Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title_full | Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title_short | Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems |
title_sort | benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ode models of biological systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82196-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stadterphilipp benchmarkingofnumericalintegrationmethodsforodemodelsofbiologicalsystems AT schalteyannik benchmarkingofnumericalintegrationmethodsforodemodelsofbiologicalsystems AT schmiesterleonard benchmarkingofnumericalintegrationmethodsforodemodelsofbiologicalsystems AT hasenauerjan benchmarkingofnumericalintegrationmethodsforodemodelsofbiologicalsystems AT staporpaull benchmarkingofnumericalintegrationmethodsforodemodelsofbiologicalsystems |