Cargando…
A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA
INTRODUCTION: If their target glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is not achieved after 3 months, timely treatment intensification is recommended in people with type 2 diabetes to maintain glycemic control and minimize vascular complications. We retrospectively investigated potential therapeutic inertia i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00993-w |
_version_ | 1783644771819978752 |
---|---|
author | Rattelman, Cori R. Ciemins, Elizabeth L. Stempniewicz, Nikita Mocarski, Michelle Ganguly, Rahul Cuddeback, John K. |
author_facet | Rattelman, Cori R. Ciemins, Elizabeth L. Stempniewicz, Nikita Mocarski, Michelle Ganguly, Rahul Cuddeback, John K. |
author_sort | Rattelman, Cori R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: If their target glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is not achieved after 3 months, timely treatment intensification is recommended in people with type 2 diabetes to maintain glycemic control and minimize vascular complications. We retrospectively investigated potential therapeutic inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes in multiple health care organizations across the USA. METHODS: Electronic health records were analyzed from 22 American Medical Group Association (AMGA) health care organizations. Bolus insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) ≥ 8.0% (≥ 64 mmol/mol) at baseline were followed for 24 months to identify the frequency and average duration of therapeutic inertia (no new class of glucose-lowering medication prescribed, or not achieving their target HbA(1c) [< 8.0%; < 64 mmol/mol]). RESULTS: The study cohort comprised almost 28,000 patients. Therapeutic inertia was observed in ≈ 50% of patients after 6 months, and in > 10% after 24 months. Less therapeutic inertia was observed in patients receiving one or no oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (36% or 28%, respectively, at 6 months), while more inertia was seen following multiple OADs or basal insulin (54% of those on baseline basal insulin at 6 months). Although an observable action was recorded for 90% of patients, many (44%) had still not achieved their target HbA(1c) after 24 months. CONCLUSION: The results corroborate the presence of therapeutic inertia in people with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that treatment intensification guidelines are not being followed. Extensive variability in the presence of therapeutic inertia was observed both across and within organizations; investigating this further and sharing best practices across providers might help improve the quality of patient care at organizational and national levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-020-00993-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7846632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78466322021-02-04 A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA Rattelman, Cori R. Ciemins, Elizabeth L. Stempniewicz, Nikita Mocarski, Michelle Ganguly, Rahul Cuddeback, John K. Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: If their target glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is not achieved after 3 months, timely treatment intensification is recommended in people with type 2 diabetes to maintain glycemic control and minimize vascular complications. We retrospectively investigated potential therapeutic inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes in multiple health care organizations across the USA. METHODS: Electronic health records were analyzed from 22 American Medical Group Association (AMGA) health care organizations. Bolus insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) ≥ 8.0% (≥ 64 mmol/mol) at baseline were followed for 24 months to identify the frequency and average duration of therapeutic inertia (no new class of glucose-lowering medication prescribed, or not achieving their target HbA(1c) [< 8.0%; < 64 mmol/mol]). RESULTS: The study cohort comprised almost 28,000 patients. Therapeutic inertia was observed in ≈ 50% of patients after 6 months, and in > 10% after 24 months. Less therapeutic inertia was observed in patients receiving one or no oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (36% or 28%, respectively, at 6 months), while more inertia was seen following multiple OADs or basal insulin (54% of those on baseline basal insulin at 6 months). Although an observable action was recorded for 90% of patients, many (44%) had still not achieved their target HbA(1c) after 24 months. CONCLUSION: The results corroborate the presence of therapeutic inertia in people with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that treatment intensification guidelines are not being followed. Extensive variability in the presence of therapeutic inertia was observed both across and within organizations; investigating this further and sharing best practices across providers might help improve the quality of patient care at organizational and national levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-020-00993-w. Springer Healthcare 2021-01-18 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7846632/ /pubmed/33460018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00993-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rattelman, Cori R. Ciemins, Elizabeth L. Stempniewicz, Nikita Mocarski, Michelle Ganguly, Rahul Cuddeback, John K. A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title | A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title_full | A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title_short | A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes management across a diverse population of health care organizations in the usa |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00993-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattelmancorir aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT cieminselizabethl aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT stempniewicznikita aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT mocarskimichelle aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT gangulyrahul aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT cuddebackjohnk aretrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT rattelmancorir retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT cieminselizabethl retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT stempniewicznikita retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT mocarskimichelle retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT gangulyrahul retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa AT cuddebackjohnk retrospectiveanalysisoftherapeuticinertiaintype2diabetesmanagementacrossadiversepopulationofhealthcareorganizationsintheusa |