Cargando…

Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale

PURPOSE: The 15- and 10-item short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale (SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10) were recently developed as a quick assessment of caregiver quality of life. Reference values describing the distribution of the total and domain scores are available for the full-lengt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chun Fan, Wee, Hwee Lin, Teo, Irene, Lee, Geok Ling, Thumboo, Julian, Cheung, Yin Bun, Neo, Shirlyn H. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33512596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00290-5
_version_ 1783644774563053568
author Lee, Chun Fan
Wee, Hwee Lin
Teo, Irene
Lee, Geok Ling
Thumboo, Julian
Cheung, Yin Bun
Neo, Shirlyn H. S.
author_facet Lee, Chun Fan
Wee, Hwee Lin
Teo, Irene
Lee, Geok Ling
Thumboo, Julian
Cheung, Yin Bun
Neo, Shirlyn H. S.
author_sort Lee, Chun Fan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The 15- and 10-item short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale (SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10) were recently developed as a quick assessment of caregiver quality of life. Reference values describing the distribution of the total and domain scores are available for the full-length version, but they are not yet available for the short forms. This study aimed to estimate the reference values for the short forms. METHODS: Data from a cross-sectional survey of 612 family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in Singapore were fitted in quantile regression models. Percentiles were estimated by regressing the short forms’ scores on caregiver characteristics. Classification by the reference values for the short forms and the full-length version were compared and agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: The caregiver’s role in caring for the patient and the patient’s performance status were associated with the percentiles of the total scores and most domain scores (each Bonferroni-adjusted p-value, P(B), < 0.05). Higher-educated caregivers were categorized into higher percentiles according to the SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10 total scores and the SCQOLS-15 Mental Well-being and Financial Well-being domain scores (each P(B) < 0.05). Ethnicity was associated with the SCQOLS-15 Physical Well-being and Experience & Meaning domains (each P(B) < 0.05). The percentiles for the short forms showed moderate to substantial agreement with those for the full-length version in terms of classifying caregivers into percentile intervals (quadratic-weighted Kappa = 0.72 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Reference values for the SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10 were estimated in relation to caregiver characteristics to facilitate interpretation of the short form scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00290-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7846647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78466472021-02-04 Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale Lee, Chun Fan Wee, Hwee Lin Teo, Irene Lee, Geok Ling Thumboo, Julian Cheung, Yin Bun Neo, Shirlyn H. S. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research PURPOSE: The 15- and 10-item short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale (SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10) were recently developed as a quick assessment of caregiver quality of life. Reference values describing the distribution of the total and domain scores are available for the full-length version, but they are not yet available for the short forms. This study aimed to estimate the reference values for the short forms. METHODS: Data from a cross-sectional survey of 612 family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in Singapore were fitted in quantile regression models. Percentiles were estimated by regressing the short forms’ scores on caregiver characteristics. Classification by the reference values for the short forms and the full-length version were compared and agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: The caregiver’s role in caring for the patient and the patient’s performance status were associated with the percentiles of the total scores and most domain scores (each Bonferroni-adjusted p-value, P(B), < 0.05). Higher-educated caregivers were categorized into higher percentiles according to the SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10 total scores and the SCQOLS-15 Mental Well-being and Financial Well-being domain scores (each P(B) < 0.05). Ethnicity was associated with the SCQOLS-15 Physical Well-being and Experience & Meaning domains (each P(B) < 0.05). The percentiles for the short forms showed moderate to substantial agreement with those for the full-length version in terms of classifying caregivers into percentile intervals (quadratic-weighted Kappa = 0.72 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Reference values for the SCQOLS-15 and SCQOLS-10 were estimated in relation to caregiver characteristics to facilitate interpretation of the short form scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00290-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7846647/ /pubmed/33512596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00290-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Chun Fan
Wee, Hwee Lin
Teo, Irene
Lee, Geok Ling
Thumboo, Julian
Cheung, Yin Bun
Neo, Shirlyn H. S.
Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title_full Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title_fullStr Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title_full_unstemmed Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title_short Reference values for the short forms of the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
title_sort reference values for the short forms of the singapore caregiver quality of life scale
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33512596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00290-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leechunfan referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT weehweelin referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT teoirene referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT leegeokling referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT thumboojulian referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT cheungyinbun referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale
AT neoshirlynhs referencevaluesfortheshortformsofthesingaporecaregiverqualityoflifescale