Cargando…

Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents

BACKGROUND: Parents play a key role in infant’s development through their interactions and the type of environment they provide to promote active play. The amount of time parents are able to spend with their infant is dependent on their working status, yet few studies have explored parent perception...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snyder, Kailey, Rech, John P., Masuda, Kim, Dinkel, Danae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33516184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10286-x
_version_ 1783644850339446784
author Snyder, Kailey
Rech, John P.
Masuda, Kim
Dinkel, Danae
author_facet Snyder, Kailey
Rech, John P.
Masuda, Kim
Dinkel, Danae
author_sort Snyder, Kailey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parents play a key role in infant’s development through their interactions and the type of environment they provide to promote active play. The amount of time parents are able to spend with their infant is dependent on their working status, yet few studies have explored parent perception of their infant’s active play by working status. The purpose of this study was to explore parent perception of active play and compare responses between working and stay-at-home parents. METHODS: Twenty-nine parents participated in this qualitative study by completing a one-time, in-person semi-structured interview based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Themes were developed and compared based on parental working status using a directed content analysis approach. RESULTS: All parents believed active play could have a positive effect on their child’s development through physical, social and emotional, cognitive, and/or language and communication development. However, stay-at-home parents reported a broader impact of active play across these domains; whereas working parents most often referenced active play as impacting infant’s physical development. Social and emotional interactions were the highest reported form of active play among all parents. Additionally, all parents described similar barriers to increasing the time for active play. The most commonly reported barrier for all parents was time or schedule followed by care needs of the infant, environmental concerns, and need for restrictive devices (e.g., car seats). More stay-at-home parents than working parents reported the care needs of the infant as being a barrier. Recommendations for active play were not widely known amongst all parents, with a higher percentage of working parents reporting they would desire advice from a healthcare provider. CONCLUSIONS: Working status of parents appears to have implications on perceptions of active play which in turn may influence infants’ development. Future studies should objectively assess the impact of parents’ working status on infant development and explore how gender of the parent may serve as a confounding variable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10286-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7847006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78470062021-02-01 Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents Snyder, Kailey Rech, John P. Masuda, Kim Dinkel, Danae BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Parents play a key role in infant’s development through their interactions and the type of environment they provide to promote active play. The amount of time parents are able to spend with their infant is dependent on their working status, yet few studies have explored parent perception of their infant’s active play by working status. The purpose of this study was to explore parent perception of active play and compare responses between working and stay-at-home parents. METHODS: Twenty-nine parents participated in this qualitative study by completing a one-time, in-person semi-structured interview based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Themes were developed and compared based on parental working status using a directed content analysis approach. RESULTS: All parents believed active play could have a positive effect on their child’s development through physical, social and emotional, cognitive, and/or language and communication development. However, stay-at-home parents reported a broader impact of active play across these domains; whereas working parents most often referenced active play as impacting infant’s physical development. Social and emotional interactions were the highest reported form of active play among all parents. Additionally, all parents described similar barriers to increasing the time for active play. The most commonly reported barrier for all parents was time or schedule followed by care needs of the infant, environmental concerns, and need for restrictive devices (e.g., car seats). More stay-at-home parents than working parents reported the care needs of the infant as being a barrier. Recommendations for active play were not widely known amongst all parents, with a higher percentage of working parents reporting they would desire advice from a healthcare provider. CONCLUSIONS: Working status of parents appears to have implications on perceptions of active play which in turn may influence infants’ development. Future studies should objectively assess the impact of parents’ working status on infant development and explore how gender of the parent may serve as a confounding variable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10286-x. BioMed Central 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7847006/ /pubmed/33516184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10286-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Snyder, Kailey
Rech, John P.
Masuda, Kim
Dinkel, Danae
Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title_full Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title_fullStr Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title_short Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
title_sort perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33516184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10286-x
work_keys_str_mv AT snyderkailey perspectivesofinfantactiveplayaqualitativecomparisonofworkingversusstayathomeparents
AT rechjohnp perspectivesofinfantactiveplayaqualitativecomparisonofworkingversusstayathomeparents
AT masudakim perspectivesofinfantactiveplayaqualitativecomparisonofworkingversusstayathomeparents
AT dinkeldanae perspectivesofinfantactiveplayaqualitativecomparisonofworkingversusstayathomeparents