Cargando…
Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) programs have shown some effectiveness in alleviating cognitive symptoms in long-term cancer survivors. For patients presenting with cognitive symptoms in the early post-treatment phase, the benefit of CCT is unclear. To assess the possibility of tes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00778-3 |
_version_ | 1783644850591105024 |
---|---|
author | Mayo, Samantha J. Rourke, Sean B. Atenafu, Eshetu G. Vitorino, Rita Chen, Christine Kuruvilla, John |
author_facet | Mayo, Samantha J. Rourke, Sean B. Atenafu, Eshetu G. Vitorino, Rita Chen, Christine Kuruvilla, John |
author_sort | Mayo, Samantha J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) programs have shown some effectiveness in alleviating cognitive symptoms in long-term cancer survivors. For patients presenting with cognitive symptoms in the early post-treatment phase, the benefit of CCT is unclear. To assess the possibility of testing the effectiveness of CCT in the early post-treatment period, our aim was to investigate the feasibility of an 8-week home-based, online CCT intervention among patients who have recently completed treatment for hematological malignancy. METHODS: This study was a single-arm, non-blinded, feasibility study. All participants were provided with the CCT intervention for an 8-week period. Feasibility was evaluated based on participant adherence and patient perceptions of the intervention, assessed through responses to an acceptability questionnaire and semi-structured interviews at the end of the intervention period. RESULTS: The feasibility study included 19 patients who had completed treatment for hematological malignancy at a Canadian tertiary cancer center. Adherence to the CCT intervention was limited, with only one participant meeting the criteria for intervention adherence. At the end of the intervention period, participants characterized the program as easy to follow (92%) and felt well-prepared for how to complete the exercises (100%). In semi-structured interviews, participants highlighted post-treatment barriers to intervention adherence that included symptom burden and competing time demands. Participants also suggested improvements to the intervention that could help maintain adherence despite these barriers, such as fostering a sense of accountability, providing personalized feedback and coaching, and enabling opportunities for peer support. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in CCT can be challenging in the post-treatment period for hematological cancers. Further research on the effectiveness of CCT in this setting may require the implementation of strategies that support participants’ engagement with the intervention in the context of symptoms and competing demands, such as establishing a minimum dose requirement and integrating approaches to help promote and sustain motivation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7847007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78470072021-02-01 Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study Mayo, Samantha J. Rourke, Sean B. Atenafu, Eshetu G. Vitorino, Rita Chen, Christine Kuruvilla, John Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) programs have shown some effectiveness in alleviating cognitive symptoms in long-term cancer survivors. For patients presenting with cognitive symptoms in the early post-treatment phase, the benefit of CCT is unclear. To assess the possibility of testing the effectiveness of CCT in the early post-treatment period, our aim was to investigate the feasibility of an 8-week home-based, online CCT intervention among patients who have recently completed treatment for hematological malignancy. METHODS: This study was a single-arm, non-blinded, feasibility study. All participants were provided with the CCT intervention for an 8-week period. Feasibility was evaluated based on participant adherence and patient perceptions of the intervention, assessed through responses to an acceptability questionnaire and semi-structured interviews at the end of the intervention period. RESULTS: The feasibility study included 19 patients who had completed treatment for hematological malignancy at a Canadian tertiary cancer center. Adherence to the CCT intervention was limited, with only one participant meeting the criteria for intervention adherence. At the end of the intervention period, participants characterized the program as easy to follow (92%) and felt well-prepared for how to complete the exercises (100%). In semi-structured interviews, participants highlighted post-treatment barriers to intervention adherence that included symptom burden and competing time demands. Participants also suggested improvements to the intervention that could help maintain adherence despite these barriers, such as fostering a sense of accountability, providing personalized feedback and coaching, and enabling opportunities for peer support. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in CCT can be challenging in the post-treatment period for hematological cancers. Further research on the effectiveness of CCT in this setting may require the implementation of strategies that support participants’ engagement with the intervention in the context of symptoms and competing demands, such as establishing a minimum dose requirement and integrating approaches to help promote and sustain motivation. BioMed Central 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7847007/ /pubmed/33514444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00778-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mayo, Samantha J. Rourke, Sean B. Atenafu, Eshetu G. Vitorino, Rita Chen, Christine Kuruvilla, John Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title | Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title_full | Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title_short | Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
title_sort | computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00778-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayosamanthaj computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy AT rourkeseanb computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy AT atenafueshetug computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy AT vitorinorita computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy AT chenchristine computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy AT kuruvillajohn computerizedcognitivetraininginposttreatmenthematologicalcancersurvivorsafeasibilitystudy |