Cargando…

Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations

CONTEXT: In the emergency ward, where the use of ultrasound is common (including for sterile procedures), ward equipment is constantly exposed to high risks of microbiological contamination. There are no clear guidelines for disinfection control practices in emergency departments, and it is not know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andolfo, A., Maatoug, R., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Fayolle, C., Blanckaert, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33516268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00896-w
_version_ 1783644943842017280
author Andolfo, A.
Maatoug, R.
Peiffer-Smadja, N.
Fayolle, C.
Blanckaert, K.
author_facet Andolfo, A.
Maatoug, R.
Peiffer-Smadja, N.
Fayolle, C.
Blanckaert, K.
author_sort Andolfo, A.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: In the emergency ward, where the use of ultrasound is common (including for sterile procedures), ward equipment is constantly exposed to high risks of microbiological contamination. There are no clear guidelines for disinfection control practices in emergency departments, and it is not known how emergency ward doctors follow good hygiene practices. METHOD: A multi-centre audit was conducted in 16 emergency services from Northern France regional hospitals, in form of a questionnaire. It was proposed to all emergency ward physicians. We excluded questionnaires when physicians mentioned that they did not use ultrasound on a daily basis. The questionnaire was designed using existing hygiene and ultrasound disinfection practices guidelines from varying French medical societies. It included three different clinical scenarios: (a) ultrasound on healthy skin, (b) on injured skin, and (c) ultrasound-guided punctures. All questions were closed-ended, with only one answer corresponding to the guidelines. We then calculated compliance rates for each question, each clinical situation, and an overall compliance rate for all the questions. RESULTS: 104 questionnaires were collected, and 19 were excluded. For the 85 analysed questionnaires, the compliance rates were 60.4% 95% CI [56.4–64.7] for ultrasound on healthy skin, 70.9% 95% CI [66.3–76.1] on injured skin and 69.4% 95% CI [65.1–73.6] for ultrasound-guided punctures. The overall compliance rate for the compliance questions was 66.1% 95% CI [62.8–69.1]. Analysis of the questionnaires revealed severe asepsis errors, misuse of gel, ignorance of infection control practices to be applied in the context of ultrasound-guided puncture and exposure of the probe to body fluids. CONCLUSION: This study details areas for quality improvement in the disinfection of emergency ultrasound scanner use. Consequently, we propose a standardized protocol based upon the recommendations used for the questionnaire drafting, with a visual focus on the low compliance points that have been revealed in this audit. This protocol has been distributed to all the medical emergency services audited and included in the emergency resident’s ultrasound learning program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7847554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78475542021-02-01 Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations Andolfo, A. Maatoug, R. Peiffer-Smadja, N. Fayolle, C. Blanckaert, K. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research CONTEXT: In the emergency ward, where the use of ultrasound is common (including for sterile procedures), ward equipment is constantly exposed to high risks of microbiological contamination. There are no clear guidelines for disinfection control practices in emergency departments, and it is not known how emergency ward doctors follow good hygiene practices. METHOD: A multi-centre audit was conducted in 16 emergency services from Northern France regional hospitals, in form of a questionnaire. It was proposed to all emergency ward physicians. We excluded questionnaires when physicians mentioned that they did not use ultrasound on a daily basis. The questionnaire was designed using existing hygiene and ultrasound disinfection practices guidelines from varying French medical societies. It included three different clinical scenarios: (a) ultrasound on healthy skin, (b) on injured skin, and (c) ultrasound-guided punctures. All questions were closed-ended, with only one answer corresponding to the guidelines. We then calculated compliance rates for each question, each clinical situation, and an overall compliance rate for all the questions. RESULTS: 104 questionnaires were collected, and 19 were excluded. For the 85 analysed questionnaires, the compliance rates were 60.4% 95% CI [56.4–64.7] for ultrasound on healthy skin, 70.9% 95% CI [66.3–76.1] on injured skin and 69.4% 95% CI [65.1–73.6] for ultrasound-guided punctures. The overall compliance rate for the compliance questions was 66.1% 95% CI [62.8–69.1]. Analysis of the questionnaires revealed severe asepsis errors, misuse of gel, ignorance of infection control practices to be applied in the context of ultrasound-guided puncture and exposure of the probe to body fluids. CONCLUSION: This study details areas for quality improvement in the disinfection of emergency ultrasound scanner use. Consequently, we propose a standardized protocol based upon the recommendations used for the questionnaire drafting, with a visual focus on the low compliance points that have been revealed in this audit. This protocol has been distributed to all the medical emergency services audited and included in the emergency resident’s ultrasound learning program. BioMed Central 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7847554/ /pubmed/33516268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00896-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Andolfo, A.
Maatoug, R.
Peiffer-Smadja, N.
Fayolle, C.
Blanckaert, K.
Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title_full Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title_fullStr Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title_full_unstemmed Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title_short Emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
title_sort emergency ward ultrasound: clinical audit on disinfection practices during routine and sterile examinations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33516268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00896-w
work_keys_str_mv AT andolfoa emergencywardultrasoundclinicalauditondisinfectionpracticesduringroutineandsterileexaminations
AT maatougr emergencywardultrasoundclinicalauditondisinfectionpracticesduringroutineandsterileexaminations
AT peiffersmadjan emergencywardultrasoundclinicalauditondisinfectionpracticesduringroutineandsterileexaminations
AT fayollec emergencywardultrasoundclinicalauditondisinfectionpracticesduringroutineandsterileexaminations
AT blanckaertk emergencywardultrasoundclinicalauditondisinfectionpracticesduringroutineandsterileexaminations