Cargando…

Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of open radical hysterectomy and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIS) in early stage cervical cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 148 patients with stage IB1 - IIA2 cervical cancer who underwent either minimally invasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kim, Sang Il, Lee, Jiwoo, Hong, Jiyun, Lee, Sung Jong, Park, Dong Choon, Yoon, Joo Hee
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Ivyspring International Publisher 2021
Materias:	Research Paper
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.55017

Ejemplares similares

Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?
por: Ahn, Jung Hwan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Lan Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Tanaka, Tomohito, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer
por: Kong, Tae-Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
por: Zhang, Mengting, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
por: Yang, Eun Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
por: Sun, Si, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Minimally invasive surgery for patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Kim, Se Ik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer
por: Pyeon, Seung Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Necessity of Radical Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Patients with Cervical Invasion
por: Lee, Taek Sang, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Impact of surgeon learning curve in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy on early stage cervical cancer patient survival
por: Pedone Anchora, L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Chen, I.-Ning, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective study
por: Zhang, Sichen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Bogani, Giorgio, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
por: Kim, Jin Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
por: Kim, Hyeongsu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
por: Baessler, K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review
por: Fusegi, Atsushi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Lee, Seung Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
por: Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
por: Park, Ju Young, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimally-Invasive Versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial Carcinoma With Glandular or Stromal Invasion of Cervix
por: Jung, Jihee, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique
por: Kanao, Hiroyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
por: Wang, Wenhui, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: ESGE-SERGS position document and joint-statement *
Publicado: (2020)

Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Yizi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
por: Zeng, Zhen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of long-term bowel symptoms after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer
por: He, Ruiju, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement
por: Kim, Miseon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Potential strategies for prevention of tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy
por: Bebia, Vicente, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is it time to call for improvement in surgical techniques for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy?
por: Chuang, Linus, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy
por: Köhler, Christhardt, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Oncological Results of Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Should We Really Abandon Minimally Invasive Surgery?
por: Torné, Aureli, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fat03f9fnn49fqb6ah0jlqp4qc